Peppermint Patty Posted January 10, 2017 Report Share Posted January 10, 2017 43 minutes ago, Tigers2010 said: and(B) with intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person; (ii) arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person; or Look, the people who investigated the action know the law better than we do. They can interpret the law better than we can. They concluded no law was broken. Ya'll can post all the links to the penal code you want. They looked at it and found no law violate. So what is the point of posting a link to a law that was not broken? You can "break the law" and not be relieved of your duties. It's not cut and dry. There was an issue, it was investigated, and the outcome has been determined. As a person with no dog in this hunt, I am happy with the outcome. I am willing to bet that there will not be any cameras in the locker-rooms. yeadatway 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tigers2010 Posted January 10, 2017 Report Share Posted January 10, 2017 3 minutes ago, Bandwagon Ranger said: You can "break the law" and not be relieved of your duties. It's not cut and dry. There was an issue, it was investigated, and the outcome has been determined. As a person with no dog in this hunt, I am happy with the outcome. I am willing to bet that there will not be any cameras in the locker-rooms. Yes you can, but that isn't the case here. It was determined he didn't break the law. And I am with you, I am glad he was not terminated, and I doubt the camera he put up is still there. For one, he caught the thief so there is no point, and two, I am sure he doesn't want to deal with this again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BMTSoulja1 Posted January 11, 2017 Report Share Posted January 11, 2017 5 hours ago, yeadatway said: glad he was re-instated. Casual observation. Most of the people th ata glad that he's reinstated is only because they want little Johnny to keep his starting spot and not have to compete for it next year.... At least that's word around town. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irishwoad Posted January 11, 2017 Report Share Posted January 11, 2017 Really, of all the reasons to be glad a man got reinstated is because their sons don't have to compete for a position on the field with a team that went 11-2.....hmmm Could it be that they are happy for the man because he got his life back and the kids have some normalcy back in their daily routines. Just a thought...... jake94 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yeadatway Posted January 12, 2017 Report Share Posted January 12, 2017 On 1/11/2017 at 7:46 PM, BMTSoulja1 said: Casual observation. Most of the people th ata glad that he's reinstated is only because they want little Johnny to keep his starting spot and not have to compete for it next year.... At least that's word around town. Maybe that's the case for some. I, on the other hand have heard nothing but good things about the Coach from not only a coaching perspective but a character perception as well. It may be only my opinion, but I believe Beaumont ISD is lucky to have a guy like that at the helm of it's largest ISD concerning all things athletics. Perhaps, there are many who are unappreciative. AthleticSupporter - Jock 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.