Jump to content

Hardin-Jefferson 55 Cleveland 54/FINAL


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

Saw something I have never seen before in all of the basketball I have watched.  Cleveland goes to the free throw line with 18 seconds left trailing by two.  They make first free throw and miss the second one but got a putback rebound and are now up by 1 with about 12 seconds left.  HJ player dribbles to the paint and puts up a shot and is fouled with 9/10 of one second left.  HJ player makes the first free throw to tie the game.  As would be expected, opposing coach calls a timeout to let the HJ shooter have to think about the next free throw.  Following the timeout, the Cleveland players get in their respective rebounding positions.  At this time, you would expect the referee to hand the ball to the free throw shooter and proceed.   Instead of doing so, referee approaches each Cleveland player consecutively and has a brief conversation with them individually.( ( 4 separate conversations)  Has anybody else ever seen something like this?  I will let you draw your own conclusion about what the referee was attempting to achieve.  After all of those histrionics, the HJ player made the second free throw- Game over.  If HJ had lost, I would not be able to make the above statement because it would strictly be viewed as sour grapes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, stevenash said:

Saw something I have never seen before in all of the basketball I have watched.  Cleveland goes to the free throw line with 18 seconds left trailing by two.  They make first free throw and miss the second one but got a putback rebound and are now up by 1 with about 12 seconds left.  HJ player dribbles to the paint and puts up a shot and is fouled with 9/10 of one second left.  HJ player makes the first free throw to tie the game.  As would be expected, opposing coach calls a timeout to let the HJ shooter have to think about the next free throw.  Following the timeout, the Cleveland players get in their respective rebounding positions.  At this time, you would expect the referee to hand the ball to the free throw shooter and proceed.   Instead of doing so, referee approaches each Cleveland player consecutively and has a brief conversation with them individually.( ( 4 separate conversations)  Has anybody else ever seen something like this?  I will let you draw your own conclusion about what the referee was attempting to achieve.  After all of those histrionics, the HJ player made the second free throw- Game over.  If HJ had lost, I would not be able to make the above statement because it would strictly be viewed as sour grapes.

Can honestly say that is a new one for me.  Have never seen anything like that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AggiesAreWe said:

Another question would be why just speak to Cleveland players? If the official had something to say, he should have addressed everyone that was lined up on the lane.

Or if it was an issue for just Cleveland, address it to the coach or to the players before they came out of the time out.  Very odd indeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

That wasn't the only strange happenings in this game :) 

???????

I have never seen a basketball game officiated like this in all my life and I have spent a lot of hours in the gym, even officiated quite a few games in my younger days. There were multiple calls over turned or changed down the stretch in this game. On one possession a block was called by one official, a charge by the other. The "dominant" official over ruled his counterpart. On another possession one of the HJ players wound up 2 rows deep in the stands but no official saw the shove that put him there. Play was stopped on at least 1 occasion where there was a wide open drive to the basket and no call made. Overall the mechanics of this crew was awful, no other way to put it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, whsalum said:

I have never seen a basketball game officiated like this in all my life and I have spent a lot of hours in the gym, even officiated quite a few games in my younger days. There were multiple calls over turned or changed down the stretch in this game. On one possession a block was called by one official, a charge by the other. The "dominant" official over ruled his counterpart. On another possession one of the HJ players wound up 2 rows deep in the stands but no official saw the shove that put him there. Play was stopped on at least 1 occasion where there was a wide open drive to the basket and no call made. Overall the mechanics of this crew was awful, no other way to put it.

I have seen some of that this year as well..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined


  • Posts

    • naw, maaaaybe 7, definitely not 8 deep.  today im avoiding sitting by #10s parents, had to move away yesterday.   "put my son back in jub, put my son back in"  and then crying on every little touch of someone.    lets ball out today ktz!    
    • Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level.  We'll be at McNeese this Friday night at 6pm.
    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...