Jump to content

First 100 Days


PhatMack19

Recommended Posts

Tomorrow's announcement is supposed to restrict Visa's from 7 countries with known terrorist ties.

 

The orders on immigration, a congressional aide said, are expected to include restrictions on refugees, and people with some visas from countries including Iraq, Iran, Syria, Yemen, Sudan, Somalia and Libya

 

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if I can remember a president taking this much action in the first couple of days of his presidency.  I'm not sure if this is normal, but it's just bigger news because it's trump doing it?  Or if he's doing something different.  Maybe because there are a bunch of questionable lefty policies that need to be changed/repealed/reigned in?   Anyone who's followed politics longer and more closely than me have any input? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of Obama's first things to do was give Solyndra $535M that the owners quickly pocketed and closed the business. Could anyone on the left post anything Trump has done so far that is worse? Obama quickly started a spending spree that finally ended last week.  It's amazing that Trump is keeping and creating jobs in America, and all the left can do is march around with puss#&$ around their heads like idiots.  Trump will help the economy more in his first 100 days than our past "leader" did in eight years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On January 25, 2017 at 7:45 AM, bullets13 said:

I don't know if I can remember a president taking this much action in the first couple of days of his presidency.  I'm not sure if this is normal, but it's just bigger news because it's trump doing it?  Or if he's doing something different.  Maybe because there are a bunch of questionable lefty policies that need to be changed/repealed/reigned in?   Anyone who's followed politics longer and more closely than me have any input? 

I don't remember anything comparable to it before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined


  • Posts

    • naw, maaaaybe 7, definitely not 8 deep.  today im avoiding sitting by #10s parents, had to move away yesterday.   "put my son back in jub, put my son back in"  and then crying on every little touch of someone.    lets ball out today ktz!    
    • Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level.  We'll be at McNeese this Friday night at 6pm.
    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...