Jump to content

Protesters at JFK Airport ??


Hagar

Recommended Posts

I don't question their right to peaceful protest, but I wonder why they weren't protesting when Americans were getting their heads cut off live on the internet?  Or when the 90+ people were shot in the Orlando nightclub?  Or when ISIS prisoners were being burned alive in cages?  Can anyone give me a logical answer?  

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, REBgp said:

I don't question their right to peaceful protest, but I wonder why they weren't protesting when Americans were getting their heads cut off live on the internet?  Or when the 90+ people were shot in the Orlando nightclub?  Or when ISIS prisoners were being burned alive in cages?  Can anyone give me a logical answer?  

This is the hidden content, please

I don't have a good answer for you Reb. I am going to guess that they have nothing better to do. They see a protest on the news and they are followers.

Also, to use an overused expression, they are uninformed. These same countries were under investigation by the Obama administration. No problem with that.

I think Mack posted the link on another thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, REBgp said:

I don't question their right to peaceful protest, but I wonder why they weren't protesting when Americans were getting their heads cut off live on the internet?  Or when the 90+ people were shot in the Orlando nightclub?  Or when ISIS prisoners were being burned alive in cages?  Can anyone give me a logical answer?  

This is the hidden content, please

Maybe because Soros didn't offer to pay them under those circumstances at that time?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, stevenash said:

Maybe because Soros didn't offer to pay them under those circumstances at that time?

 

No, I suppose he didn't see any gain in that.  His agenda could care less about Americans.  His agenda is to destroy America as it is known now.  Why, is a question I'll never know the answer to.  I have theories, but they're just that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, REBgp said:

I don't question their right to peaceful protest, but I wonder why they weren't protesting when Americans were getting their heads cut off live on the internet?  Or when the 90+ people were shot in the Orlando nightclub?  Or when ISIS prisoners were being burned alive in cages?  Can anyone give me a logical answer?  

This is the hidden content, please

Because it's not "spontaneous!"  Because, again, it's being funded by this Un-American clown!

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, baddog said:

Still don't know why he cant be arrested for funding the Ferguson "protests" that escalated to rioting, looting, and arson.

Valid question.  Only answer I can come up with is the old stand by - Lady Justice is blind unless you're filthy rich, or Hillary.  Maybe just being a friend of Hillary is enough.  Although old Ted Kennedy was the first one who proved it.  Oh, BTW, all of the above are Democrats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, REBgp said:

Valid question.  Only answer I can come up with is the old stand by - Lady Justice is blind unless you're filthy rich, or Hillary.  Maybe just being a friend of Hillary is enough.  Although old Ted Kennedy was the first one who proved it.  Oh, BTW, all of the above are Democrats.

Mellinials would not know about Chappaquidick. They would say Chappa what?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just wondering.....if I wanted to protest in the streets, where would I go to get one of the professional looking signs or banners that these people are carrying. The ones carrying the home made cardboard signs are afraid to hold them proudly. Does Wally World have these signs? Maybe I would be turned away because I would not be protesting the same thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have to say that the left will spin anything to make their agenda. This "muslim" ban is also directed at the foreign fighters who are sided with isis and, after their fall, will be looking to return to their home countries. Isis is already losing in Mosul and Raqqa. They will run and hide trying to infiltrate through the refugee programs. Trump is protecting you at the expense of political correctness.That's right, if you are reading this, Trump is looking after you. Anyone who doesn't understand the magnitude of this decision must live under a rock and probably needs to suck their thumb and play with some Play Doh.

How come Saudi Arabia doesn't' accept these refugees, as do several other muslim nations? Shouldn't they save their "brothers"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, baddog said:

Have to say that the left will spin anything to make their agenda. This "muslim" ban is also directed at the foreign fighters who are sided with isis and, after their fall, will be looking to return to their home countries. Isis is already losing in Mosul and Raqqa. They will run and hide trying to infiltrate through the refugee programs. Trump is protecting you at the expense of political correctness.That's right, if you are reading this, Trump is looking after you. Anyone who doesn't understand the magnitude of this decision must live under a rock and probably needs to suck their thumb and play with some Play Doh.

How come Saudi Arabia doesn't' accept these refugees, as do several other muslim nations? Shouldn't they save their "brothers"?

What they don't know is this is not a Muslim ban?  There are around 40 Muslim countries, I don't think the seven he banned add up to 40.  The left are just a bunch of lunatics.  Let's see how they spin that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Well, that didn't take long to get started.

This is the hidden content, please

I was watching Tucker Carlson (my favorite show on TV now), when the network broke in to announce Trump has fired Sally Yates. I was already grinning from ear to ear as Tucker was excoriating some left wing nut-job about Trump's immigration executive order, but I fear I might have did damage to my face when this story broke in. As rumor has it, I might go blind...especially if these uplifting news breaks keep happening. I might have a permanent smile etched in my face. Of course, the Liberals will undoubtedly submit a cure for this affliction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,207
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined


  • Posts

    • That should tell everyone something pretty clearly. Does anyone really think BH is recruiting elementary kids, to get them to transfer in Jr. high? Seriously? Here is the "dirty little secret" about BH: Most people move to the district for a quality living environment to raise their young family, and benefit from the outstanding acedemics at BH. Even If all athlectics suddenly disappeared from BH, people would still want their kids in the district. If thats not enough to convince anyone, and BH really was determined to recruit, first step would be to have open enrollemnt. It is closed.        Yes, I get it, no one ever wants to give BH the benefit of the doubt on anything. Some of the accusations are beyond ridiculous though. This paranoia the BH critics are afflicted with is not just sad, its flat out laughable.     
    • Opting is always an option. Are they considering any BC assistants? Highly qualified after that season they put up. 
    • Be that as it may, only time will tell. Hide and watch. Don’t be surprised if the next HC hire uses his own recipe. That happens more than not historically. I am not arguing the point that Hooks & CT had a winning combination that could’ve been carried over. I’m saying that finding someone to do that is not going to be as easy as one might think. Tell me again why Saban’s replacement, who even has Saban’s assistance if he wants it, just lost another game to an unranked team and has taken the Tide out of playoff contention? Why wouldn’t he just follow the success of possibly the greatest college football coach ever lived? 
    • We've acknowledged having 2 HOF coaches hasn't been like most other schools. So why everyone jumps to the conclusion it wouldn't work here is beyond my comprehension. I see it carry over with these other hires. Gilmer, Aledo, North Shore, Austin Westlake. Next man up that continues the system in place has instant success. Matter fact there was 2 rookie HC that won the state championship the same year we handed over the keys. Same book. Same recipe. Better ingredients.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...