Jump to content

#TrumpLiesMatter!!


BLUEDOVE3

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, BLUEDOVE3 said:

LOL! Nice try Nash:

"The president of the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Budget said that while the debt outstanding did decline by $12 billion in his first month, it had nothing to do with new policies implemented by his administration.
“It is true the debt outstanding declined by $12 billion in the first month of Donald Trump’s presidency. We applaud the president for focusing on the debt as an important metric of success and economic health, but would point out that the improvement this early in his term has to do with normal fluctuations in spending and revenues rather than new policies he has implemented..."

I put it in bold because the false news media says Trump supporter's educational level is somewhat... , well yall know the rest.
 

 

lol...nobody is fooled here...didn't look into his statement before you posted, right?

I'll say it..."Nice try".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Englebert said:

That's kinda like saying Obama killed Bin Laden. Give credit where credit is due.

And this topic, which you started, is about Trump's lies. This is admittedly not a lie. So I'm positive you are the one that deserves the "nice try" quip. Actually I think the "try" was childish, weak and pathetic and therefore undeserving of the "nice try" description.

And do you actually believe anything a nonpartisan (or partisan) Committee has to say. How much money did the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office proclaim that, in their expert and infinite wisdom, Obamacare would save the American taxpayer? And what about the first 27 nonpartisan committees that investigated Hillary's Benghazi scandal. Not one committee investigation uncovered the fact that Hillary was using a private email server. How can you have a "thorough" (as reported) investigation without uncovering that little nugget. But yet you want to sight committees as some kind of evidence.

Okay, and Trump uses a private twitter account...sheez!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BLUEDOVE3 said:

You know the debt dropped, BUT it was dropping anyway without Trump.

You know the military was hunting Bin Laden under Bush but didn't get him until Obama was president, but you had no problem giving Obama full credit for killing Bin Laden. So don't be a hypocrite and give Trump his full credit due because he was the current office holder when the debt dropped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BLUEDOVE3 said:

Okay, and Trump uses a private twitter account...sheez!

So you failed miserably in trying to state a lie by Trump, then when called on it you attempt to use the tired old worn out tactic of deflection. And what's even more pathetic is your attempt at condescension with that little qualifier attached to the end. There are a lot of posters that are deserving of using that patronizing closing remark when responding to posts...you are not one of them.

I'm actually giving you the benefit of the doubt. I bet you failed to comprehend that I was using the Benghazi scandal to illustrate the incompetency of congressional committees, since you used a "nonpartisan committee" as your source of evidence. You mistakenly thought I was trying to bring in the Hillary scandal (which makes no sense in this context), so tried to counter with "both sides do it" argument. But I'll let you save a little dignity and conclude you were just using the overused Lefty tactic of deflection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BLUEDOVE3 said:

You know the debt dropped, BUT it was dropping anyway without Trump.

Hmmmm, that may be so, but I don't remember it dropping any the last 8 years.  If I remember right, the first month of Obama's term, the debt went up $200 billion.  So if this nonpartisan group says this is just cyclical, what happened to the cycle in Obama's first month?  

Oh, I forgot, you look upon me as one of the uneducated deplorables.  Education is a fine thing, but if you don't use that education when looking at facts, its wasted.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stevenash said:

Then, if it is still Obamacare in a different package, there is absolutely no doubt that you fully support it?

I abhor it with a passion, just like every red-blooded American should. The only thing we agree on is the new plan is just a renamed version of the old plan, with slight modifications.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, BLUEDOVE3 said:

You do know I am referring to the "new" health package proposed by your repubs, right?

Don't throw this in my face. I don't agree with it and never will. Government should take care of its old folks who worked their entire lives and paid in through the nose so they could enjoy their golden years. It is a sin not to cover them 100%. Also a sin to rob from their payments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, BLUEDOVE3 said:

You do know I am referring to the "new" health package proposed by your repubs, right?

I was a little concerned that not much had changed.  But listening to Newt Gingrich he said it's about a 5 step process.  Those who have concerns will be able to voice them somewhere along the way.  Excellent!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined



  • Posts

    • naw, maaaaybe 7, definitely not 8 deep.  today im avoiding sitting by #10s parents, had to move away yesterday.   "put my son back in jub, put my son back in"  and then crying on every little touch of someone.    lets ball out today ktz!    
    • Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level.  We'll be at McNeese this Friday night at 6pm.
    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...