Jump to content

A Sniveling Snowflake Get Educated!


Reagan

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, baddog said:

I wish I could express my thoughts as well as him.

Ain't it the truth baddog.  He's the type guy you don't want to debate with.  If I ever get to thinking how smart I am, I could watch that video and realize I'm not.  While I might mentally or verbally stumble to find a right answer, it's like he has five right answers and he only hesitates to decide which one of the five to use.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, REBgp said:

Ain't it the truth baddog.  He's the type guy you don't want to debate with.  If I ever get to thinking how smart I am, I could watch that video and realize I'm not.  While I might mentally or verbally stumble to find a right answer, it's like he has five right answers and he only hesitates to decide which one of the five to use.  

....and I thought I was the only one who picked up on that. Lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, baddog said:

....and I thought I was the only one who picked up on that. Lol.

Lol, I had a heads up from your initial comment.  About 30 seconds in, I understood why you said it.  Kinda like watching englebert & TxHoops posting - out of my league :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, baddog said:

People who see things differently than the left. That's right, there are some free thinkers left in this country. They just elected a president. It was a video, so the source cannot be discredited. Was it fake?

The lefties cannot stand to see one of their own made to look like a fool.  Westend can't differentiate real from fake.  He probably thinks video was doctored.  That is some more of the great thinking from the leftist snowflakes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, westend1 said:

Daily caller.  LOL

I would trust the Daily Caller over MSNBC, Huffington Post, Mother Jones, NBC, CNN, New York Times, Politifact and many, many other "news" sources...and I've never even been on that website (other than clicking on links from this site). Where do you get your news? The ladies on The View?

Was the video altered by the Daily Caller? Did the Daily Caller inject some untruths or "fake news" into it's commentary on the video? Why do you care about the source of an unaltered video? Is it because you have nothing of substance to say so you counter with the old and pathetic strategy of attacking the messenger. Your stance about the source could be valid if there was something that the Daily Caller interjected that you objected to. But to just attack the source makes you the joke. LOL.

And there's a reason the source of this video can only be found on "far Right" websites. The MSM and the far Left websites won't dare publish anything that doesn't conform to the wacked out agenda of the current Liberal/Socialist party, formerly known as the Democrat party. Luckily we have some on here that post links from these sites, otherwise you probably would have never heard of Ben Shapiro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Englebert said:

I would trust the Daily Caller over MSNBC, Huffington Post, Mother Jones, NBC, CNN, New York Times, Politifact and many, many other "news" sources...and I've never even been on that website (other than clicking on links from this site). Where do you get your news? The ladies on The View?

Was the video altered by the Daily Caller? Did the Daily Caller inject some untruths or "fake news" into it's commentary on the video? Why do you care about the source of an unaltered video? Is it because you have nothing of substance to say so you counter with the old and pathetic strategy of attacking the messenger. Your stance about the source could be valid if there was something that the Daily Caller interjected that you objected to. But to just attack the source makes you the joke. LOL.

And there's a reason the source of this video can only be found on "far Right" websites. The MSM and the far Left websites won't dare publish anything that doesn't conform to the wacked out agenda of the current Liberal/Socialist party, formerly known as the Democrat party. Luckily we have some on here that post links from these sites, otherwise you probably would have never heard of Ben Shapiro.

Don't expect more than a 3 or 4 word response to your well-articulated rebuttal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,207
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined


  • Posts

    • That should tell everyone something pretty clearly. Does anyone really think BH is recruiting elementary kids, to get them to transfer in Jr. high? Seriously? Here is the "dirty little secret" about BH: Most people move to the district for a quality living environment to raise their young family, and benefit from the outstanding acedemics at BH. Even If all athlectics suddenly disappeared from BH, people would still want their kids in the district. If thats not enough to convince anyone, and BH really was determined to recruit, first step would be to have open enrollemnt. It is closed.        Yes, I get it, no one ever wants to give BH the benefit of the doubt on anything. Some of the accusations are beyond ridiculous though. This paranoia the BH critics are afflicted with is not just sad, its flat out laughable.     
    • Opting is always an option. Are they considering any BC assistants? Highly qualified after that season they put up. 
    • Be that as it may, only time will tell. Hide and watch. Don’t be surprised if the next HC hire uses his own recipe. That happens more than not historically. I am not arguing the point that Hooks & CT had a winning combination that could’ve been carried over. I’m saying that finding someone to do that is not going to be as easy as one might think. Tell me again why Saban’s replacement, who even has Saban’s assistance if he wants it, just lost another game to an unranked team and has taken the Tide out of playoff contention? Why wouldn’t he just follow the success of possibly the greatest college football coach ever lived? 
    • We've acknowledged having 2 HOF coaches hasn't been like most other schools. So why everyone jumps to the conclusion it wouldn't work here is beyond my comprehension. I see it carry over with these other hires. Gilmer, Aledo, North Shore, Austin Westlake. Next man up that continues the system in place has instant success. Matter fact there was 2 rookie HC that won the state championship the same year we handed over the keys. Same book. Same recipe. Better ingredients.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...