Jump to content

Silsbee vs North Forest Monday 6pm Huntsville


BADSANTA

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

North Forest beat Central by 5 this year...  Silsbee beat Central by 3....  Think about that AND the fact that North Forest beat Yates as well.  That's why I think it'll be close...

They beat Yates by 19, then turned around and lost the second time by 11.  Interesting.  They've got one kid who is averaging over 29 pts and 11 rbds a game.  They've won 17 of their last 19 and the two loses in that period were to Bellaire and Yates.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

North Forest beat Central by 5 this year...  Silsbee beat Central by 3....  Think about that AND the fact that North Forest beat Yates as well.  That's why I think it'll be close...

and PA Memorial beat NF by 14 while Central lost a game to Memorial and beat Memorial.

Another common opponent for NF and Silsbee: Cleveland

NF beat Cleveland 67-42

Silsbee beat Cleveland 97-52

 

With that said, I believe Silsbee wins by 13+

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, AggiesAreWe said:

I think you will be surprised how close Huffman will make this game

 

I'll be pretty surprised if they can keep it under 20.  I know common opponents don't mean much, but two weeks ago Tarkington lost by 2 to Huffman @ Huffman, and then last week lost to Yates by 59 on a neutral court.  I think Yates and North Forest have inflated records and rankings due to a garbage district, but Huffman has benefitted from a similar situation.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bullets13 said:

Tigers win 96-77

I'm gonna change my prediction after a little schedule research.  I'm gonna say tigers win 96-67.  North Forest has benefitted from a super soft district schedule, minus Yates, who's getting a lot of credit for a record that also benefitted from the same district schedule. of NF's 18 wins, 12 have come against teams with losing records, including an overtime win against 6-20 Wheatley (took awhile to do all this on MP, so I might be a game off one way or the other, but the numbers are either accurate or close enough).  Their 6 wins against teams with winning records have two pretty nice wins, Beaumont Central, who weren't what they've been the last several years, and Houston Yates, who again benefitted from the same soft schedule.  North Forest played a pretty tough pre-district schedule, but their record is 6-9 against teams with a winning record, and they also had losses to 10-20 Alief Hastings and 14-18 Pasadena Memorial.  They got a pretty easy draw the first couple of games in the playoffs, and looked pretty impressive, but I see them being overwhelmed tonight. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, bullets13 said:

I'm gonna change my prediction after a little schedule research.  I'm gonna say tigers win 96-67.  North Forest has benefitted from a super soft district schedule, minus Yates, who's getting a lot of credit for a record that also benefitted from the same district schedule. of NF's 18 wins, 12 have come against teams with losing records, including an overtime win against 6-20 Wheatley (took awhile to do all this on MP, so I might be a game off one way or the other, but the numbers are either accurate or close enough).  Their 6 wins against teams with winning records have two pretty nice wins, Beaumont Central, who weren't what they've been the last several years, and Houston Yates, who again benefitted from the same soft schedule.  North Forest played a pretty tough pre-district schedule, but their record is 6-9 against teams with a winning record, and they also had losses to 10-20 Alief Hastings and 14-18 Pasadena Memorial.  They got a pretty easy draw the first couple of games in the playoffs, and looked pretty impressive, but I see them being overwhelmed tonight. 

Well, I was right, but it was even worse than I thought!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined


  • Posts

    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...