Jump to content

republicans & trump just screwed 22,600 retired coal workers


Kountzer

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, Kountzer said:

"But there’s been silence from the White House as over 22,000 retired coal miners and the surviving family members of dead miners

This is the hidden content, please

They were just notified that both their retirement benefits and medical benefits would no longer be honored after 60 days."

Yep, that's as far as you read.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw a 60 Minutes segment on this. Those people voted for Trump because they thought he would come in and rescue them. It ain't happening!! Those mining jobs have been declining anyway because the demand isn't what it use to be.

Like any other politician, tell the people what you want them to hear, and vote for me!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, BLUEDOVE3 said:

I saw a 60 Minutes segment on this. Those people voted for Trump because they thought he would come in and rescue them. It ain't happening!! Those mining jobs have been declining anyway because the demand isn't what it use to be.

Like any other politician, tell the people what you want them to hear, and vote for me!

Those people did not vote for Trump so he would "rescue" them. If they wanted to be rescued, they would have voted for Hillary, who promised them free money. They were actually insightful enough to realize the free money came with chains...chains that would relegate them to welfare and government dependency. They overwhelmingly voted for Trump to save their jobs, so they can be productive and not have to beg the government for money. Whether or not Trump reduces the regulations in order to make coal mining viable again is yet to be seen. At least there is still hope, unlike with the alternative candidate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Englebert said:

Those people did not vote for Trump so he would "rescue" them. If they wanted to be rescued, they would have voted for Hillary, who promised them free money. They were actually insightful enough to realize the free money came with chains...chains that would relegate them to welfare and government dependency. They overwhelmingly voted for Trump to save their jobs, so they can be productive and not have to beg the government for money. Whether or not Trump reduces the regulations in order to make coal mining viable again is yet to be seen. At least there is still hope, unlike with the alternative candidate.

Hmmm? Okay, maybe I should edit the parts for you to see that "rescue" and saving jobs are the same thing. You going off on your govt. independence now. Here is what is funny. I would not doubt that most of you on here are receiving or benefiting  from some sort of govt. assistance. But that's another topic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BLUEDOVE3 said:

Hmmm? Okay, maybe I should edit the parts for you to see that "rescue" and saving jobs are the same thing. You going off on your govt. independence now. Here is what is funny. I would not doubt that most of you on here are receiving or benefiting  from some sort of govt. assistance. But that's another topic.

I'll go on the record...receiving 0, none nada gov assistance...how about you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, BLUEDOVE3 said:

Hmmm? Okay, maybe I should edit the parts for you to see that "rescue" and saving jobs are the same thing. You going off on your govt. independence now. Here is what is funny. I would not doubt that most of you on here are receiving or benefiting  from some sort of govt. assistance. But that's another topic.

Translation- getting some of their own money back

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, BLUEDOVE3 said:

Hmmm? Okay, maybe I should edit the parts for you to see that "rescue" and saving jobs are the same thing. You going off on your govt. independence now. Here is what is funny. I would not doubt that most of you on here are receiving or benefiting  from some sort of govt. assistance. But that's another topic.

I was unemployed for about six months during the 80s. Guess what, I found a job. I have been paying in for my whole life and people like me are who these programs are meant. Actually, unemployment insurance is paid by companies, so they are there to help the EMPLOYABLE. However, in answer to your question (something you never do) I needed ASSISTANCE, not a lifetime handout.

Did you not hear Hillary talk about putting coal miners out of business to get cleaner energy, which she later tried to clarify while lying through her teeth? YOU PEOPLE HAVE NO STANCE. If so, what is yours, except that you dont really care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you consider Social Security as Govt assistance?  My chances of getting back all the money I put in are very very slim.   Medicare?  It's a law, so is it Govt assistance?  Plus I still pay.  Got a $5 raise in SS, and my Medicare went up $30.  Govt assistance?  After working for 52 years?  I don't think so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BLUEDOVE3 said:

Hmmm? Okay, maybe I should edit the parts for you to see that "rescue" and saving jobs are the same thing. You going off on your govt. independence now. Here is what is funny. I would not doubt that most of you on here are receiving or benefiting  from some sort of govt. assistance. But that's another topic.

So Hillary saying that she would give financial assistance to laid-off workers and Trump saying he would reduce regulatory burdens on the coal mining industry in order to save their jobs is somehow equivalent in your mind. That is astonishing and disheartening to know some cannot tell the difference. And if one cannot tell the difference, one sure cannot remotely fathom the consequences each has on our society. I'll give you a hint, one is beneficial and one is not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/4/2017 at 9:32 AM, Kountzer said:

This is the hidden content, please

So let me get this straight... The coal miners union underfunded their pension and gave out money to workers that didn't earn it, and Republican Congress screwed them over?  

 

It seems to me that the UMWA screwed them over. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, PhatMack19 said:

So let me get this straight... The coal miners union underfunded their pension and gave out money to workers that didn't earn it, and Republican Congress screwed them over?  

 

It seems to me that the UMWA screwed them over. 

Check the source. Of course. What a joke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/4/2017 at 10:32 AM, Kountzer said:

"But there’s been silence from the White House as over 22,000 retired coal miners and the surviving family members of dead miners

This is the hidden content, please

They were just notified that both their retirement benefits and medical benefits would no longer be honored after 60 days."

I dont feel bad for them. A lot of coal miners voted for Trump. Be careful what you ask for. Words cant adequately describe that man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Big girl said:

I dont feel bad for them. A lot of coal miners voted for Trump. Be careful what you ask for. Words cant adequately describe that man.

I have some compassion for them because they believed what they were promised. Didnt know trump was a snake oil salesman 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Englebert said:

So Hillary saying that she would give financial assistance to laid-off workers and Trump saying he would reduce regulatory burdens on the coal mining industry in order to save their jobs is somehow equivalent in your mind. That is astonishing and disheartening to know some cannot tell the difference. And if one cannot tell the difference, one sure cannot remotely fathom the consequences each has on our society. I'll give you a hint, one is beneficial and one is not. 

So, are these regulatory burdens are in place from Trump?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So letters were sent on about this during the last administration. The problem was there and Obama did nothing about it. The article blames Trump for not fixing the problem in the two months he has been in office, but not once mentions Obama not attempting the fix it. 

Trump didn't strike the agreement in 1946, he didn't make the decisions in bankruptcy court that allowed for this, and he has been in office two months. More propaganda from the left to destroy Trump before he even gets going.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined


  • Posts

    • naw, maaaaybe 7, definitely not 8 deep.  today im avoiding sitting by #10s parents, had to move away yesterday.   "put my son back in jub, put my son back in"  and then crying on every little touch of someone.    lets ball out today ktz!    
    • Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level.  We'll be at McNeese this Friday night at 6pm.
    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...