Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, LumRaiderFan said:

My bad...you get any "comments" yet? :)

It's hard to read every post so some things are going to get posted twice. To answer your question (some people have the ability to do that) no, no comments as I would expect.

Posted

I've repeatedly said, Comey can only speak for the FBI.  He has no idea if the Secret Service, or any of the 16 of our Govt intelligence agencies might have spied on Trump or his people.  A fact that all the media, including Fox, seems to forget.  I'll bet we haven't heard the last of this fiasco.

This is the hidden content, please

Posted
15 hours ago, baddog said:

I posted this under Trump makes stuff up, but maybe it deserves its own thread.

Lol, I posted a whole new thread on it last night.  Well, our heart was in the right place.  Thought I'd add this reminder.

This is the hidden content, please

 

PS;  I'll see if I can get mine deleted.

 

Posted
7 hours ago, REBgp said:

I've repeatedly said, Comey can only speak for the FBI.  He has no idea if the Secret Service, or any of the 16 of our Govt intelligence agencies might have spied on Trump or his people.  A fact that all the media, including Fox, seems to forget.  I'll bet we haven't heard the last of this fiasco.

This is the hidden content, please

Shiff is yet another in a long list of crybabies.....wahhhhhh

Posted
32 minutes ago, Big girl said:

No, they weren't. Members of the Russian mafia who were staying in Trump Tower were being watched. They caught everyone, but the ringleader. 

What fantasyland comic book have you been reading?

Posted
3 hours ago, Big girl said:

No, they weren't. Members of the Russian mafia who were staying in Trump Tower were being watched. They caught everyone, but the ringleader. 

Link? Man, like Englebert said, you can sure fantasize.

Posted
5 minutes ago, westend1 said:

Lol.  You talk to crooks, you might get recorded.  Lesson.  Don't talk to crooks

But I thought you were SURE  he was lying.

It probably won't be the last thing you're wrong about him on.

Come on...man up and apologize to your President. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

But I thought you were SURE  he was lying.

It probably won't be the last thing you're wrong about him on.

Come on...man up and apologize to your President. 

Obama didn't order any wiretaps like he claimed.  Walmart voters crack me up.  They think they understand stuff

Posted
2 minutes ago, westend1 said:

Obama didn't order any wiretaps like he claimed.  Walmart voters crack me up.  They think they understand stuff

So you're making another dumb prediction...lol.

Insult all you want...I obviously understand this stuff much better than you. 

Posted
12 minutes ago, westend1 said:

Obama didn't order any wiretaps like he claimed.  Walmart voters crack me up.  They think they understand stuff

Enough of the semantics. Let's assume for a second that Trump was indeed surveilled(that looks quite possible). You can rest assured that falls in Obama's lap. Now, Obama's people are smart enough to do things in a manner to allow plausible deniability. But, this would not have happened without someone in the Obama administration approving it. 

 

Posted
8 minutes ago, texanabroad said:

Enough of the semantics. Let's assume for a second that Trump was indeed surveilled(that looks quite possible). You can rest assured that falls in Obama's lap. Now, Obama's people are smart enough to do things in a manner to allow plausible deniability. But, this would not have happened without someone in the Obama administration approving it. 

 

Assume

trump 

surveillance 

 

 

no evidence that that trump was monitored.   Are there recordings of trump?   No.    Enough semantics 

Posted

Yes. i stand by all three of those statements. With the recent report from Nunes and the previously leaked conversations, I think it is safe to assume that Trump admin were surveilled. I make no distinction in surveilling Trump or his chief advisors. Now, the reason of why they were surveilled is what is in question. Were they being probed in a criminal investigation, were they communicating with someone involved in a criminal investigation, or were they being surveilled for political motives. This, we shall see.

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, texanabroad said:

Yes. i stand by all three of those statements. With the recent report from Nunes and the previously leaked conversations, I think it is safe to assume that Trump admin were surveilled. I make no distinction in surveilling Trump or his chief advisors. Now, the reason of why they were surveilled is what is in question. Were they being probed in a criminal investigation, were they communicating with someone involved in a criminal investigation, or were they being surveilled for political motives. This, we shall see.

 

Fair enough 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,281
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Malachi
    Newest Member
    Malachi
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...