OK to Hunt and Kill White Women per Facebook

[Hagar]

Warning:  Don't read if you have high bp (mines thru the roof now).

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[LumRaiderFan]

Sadly, if true, this won't hurt Facebook.

Many folks couldn't get through the day without it.

[Reagan]

1 hour ago, REBgp said:

Warning:  Don't read if you have high bp (mines thru the roof now).

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Poor Laura, shows her intelligence!  She couldn't even make a correct sentence!!  But -- another attempt at an insane statement!

[77]

bring it!

 

[Hagar]

1 hour ago, 77 said:

bring it!

 

Almost to that point it appears.  Snowflakes, and all minority's have entered a very dangerous area.  If they want to make war against white people, they might find out why predominantly white countries have ruled the world so many years.

[BLUEDOVE3]

Is there a credible news source with this story?

[LumRaiderFan]

3 minutes ago, BLUEDOVE3 said:

Is there a credible news source with this story?

As credible as they get. 

http://www.setxsports.com/ip/index.php?/topic/130923-ok-to-hunt-and-kill-white-women-per-facebook/

[BS Wildcats]

Big girl is so proud

[stevenash]

33 minutes ago, BLUEDOVE3 said:

Is there a credible news source with this story?

Translation- Did MSNBC cover this?

[westend1]

Translation.  No.  No reputable news organization vetted this.   Looks fake.  Might be real.   My guess.  Heavily edited

[LumRaiderFan]

1 hour ago, westend1 said:

Translation.  No.  No reputable news organization vetted this.   Looks fake.  Might be real.   My guess.  Heavily edited

Are you talking about Dan Rather and George Bush, or CNN's handling of Zimmerman?

Are these the reputable news organizations you are talking about?

[Hagar]

1 hour ago, westend1 said:

Translation.  No.  No reputable news organization vetted this.   Looks fake.  Might be real.   My guess.  Heavily edited

Probably not what you'd consider reputable.  The ones you consider reputable are the same one who didn't report on the 14 year old HS girl being raped in a HS bathroom by two illegal aliens, one 17 and the other 18.

[westend1]

Crickets. No new source. Thanks

[LumRaiderFan]

16 minutes ago, westend1 said:

Crickets. No new source. Thanks

We're just pointing out how naive you are about your news outlets and vetting.

[westend1]

4 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

We're just pointing out how naive you are about your news outlets and vetting.

Naive is taking one questionable source and accepting it

[LumRaiderFan]

4 minutes ago, westend1 said:

Naive is taking one questionable source and accepting it

This was my first post on here..." Sadly, if true, this won't hurt Facebook."

Naive is thinking your favorite news outlets are the champions of vetting.

[texanabroad]

 Whether this is fake news or not, it touches on a serious issue in our society. The debate on this thread should be over whether there is a difference between hate speech and free speech and instead it is about whether a news source is reputable. The news source may not be reputable, but I believe the topic is very relevant and should be discussed. 

[westend1]

13 minutes ago, texanabroad said:

 Whether this is fake news or not, it touches on a serious issue in our society. The debate on this thread should be over whether there is a difference between hate speech and free speech and instead it is about whether a news source is reputable. The news source may not be reputable, but I believe the topic is very relevant and should be discussed. 

It has to be true to be relevant.   iF true, I agree that it is wrong.  I don't believe it is true.  If it was, I think at least faux news would get in on it.   Actually, I think fox doesn't outright lie.  They just spin like msnbcMSNBC

[texanabroad]

I get what you are saying and mostly agree. I just felt like the reality in the accusation warranted debate. Any reasonable person knows Infowars isn't the most reputable source. 

[LumRaiderFan]

47 minutes ago, westend1 said:

It has to be true to be relevant.   iF true, I agree that it is wrong.  I don't believe it is true.  If it was, I think at least faux news would get in on it.   Actually, I think fox doesn't outright lie.  They just spin like msnbcMSNBC

But CNN and ABC don't...lol.

[LumRaiderFan]

1 hour ago, texanabroad said:

 Whether this is fake news or not, it touches on a serious issue in our society. The debate on this thread should be over whether there is a difference between hate speech and free speech and instead it is about whether a news source is reputable. The news source may not be reputable, but I believe the topic is very relevant and should be discussed. 

I agree...that's the most overused reason to dodge a debate by the libs...even if the source is very reputable.

Liberalism is very hard to defend, but c'mon...make an effort...don't kill the messenger.

[westend1]

8 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

But CNN and ABC don't...lol.

You have to get news from somewhere.  Tell us where you go

[texanabroad]

4 minutes ago, westend1 said:

You have to get news from somewhere.  Tell us where you go

Living outside the states has forced me to work to find reputable news.  I can't sit down and turn on the television and get my news. What I have found is that it is important to get your news from a variety of different sources and come to your own conclusion. There is normally a shred of truth in most reports, sometimes even CNN(very rarely). Compare that to what another source reports and you can start to put the pieces together. This whole Fake News is a new invention by the media to bring people back in from alternative media. They have all been biased for a very long time. True journalism ended with the 24 hour news networks. 

[LumRaiderFan]

28 minutes ago, westend1 said:

You have to get news from somewhere.  Tell us where you go

Usually start with Fox, but google to see how others report and if different, why.

When I say Fox, I don't mean Hannity, O'Reilly, or Kelly...I mean the hard news, internet, not a TV fan...although I like Brett Baird.

I simply don't trust CNN anymore.

 

[BLUEDOVE3]

2 hours ago, texanabroad said:

I get what you are saying and mostly agree. I just felt like the reality in the accusation warranted debate. Any reasonable person knows Infowars isn't the most reputable source. 

Over half of the right on this site aren't sensible, trust me