Hagar Posted March 24, 2017 Report Posted March 24, 2017 Warning: Don't read if you have high bp (mines thru the roof now). This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted March 24, 2017 Report Posted March 24, 2017 Sadly, if true, this won't hurt Facebook. Many folks couldn't get through the day without it. Quote
Reagan Posted March 24, 2017 Report Posted March 24, 2017 1 hour ago, REBgp said: Warning: Don't read if you have high bp (mines thru the roof now). This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Poor Laura, shows her intelligence! She couldn't even make a correct sentence!! But -- another attempt at an insane statement! Hagar 1 Quote
Hagar Posted March 24, 2017 Author Report Posted March 24, 2017 1 hour ago, 77 said: bring it! Almost to that point it appears. Snowflakes, and all minority's have entered a very dangerous area. If they want to make war against white people, they might find out why predominantly white countries have ruled the world so many years. 77 1 Quote
BLUEDOVE3 Posted March 24, 2017 Report Posted March 24, 2017 Is there a credible news source with this story? Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted March 24, 2017 Report Posted March 24, 2017 3 minutes ago, BLUEDOVE3 said: Is there a credible news source with this story? As credible as they get. http://www.setxsports.com/ip/index.php?/topic/130923-ok-to-hunt-and-kill-white-women-per-facebook/ Hagar 1 Quote
stevenash Posted March 24, 2017 Report Posted March 24, 2017 33 minutes ago, BLUEDOVE3 said: Is there a credible news source with this story? Translation- Did MSNBC cover this? Reagan and 77 2 Quote
westend1 Posted March 24, 2017 Report Posted March 24, 2017 Translation. No. No reputable news organization vetted this. Looks fake. Might be real. My guess. Heavily edited Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted March 25, 2017 Report Posted March 25, 2017 1 hour ago, westend1 said: Translation. No. No reputable news organization vetted this. Looks fake. Might be real. My guess. Heavily edited Are you talking about Dan Rather and George Bush, or CNN's handling of Zimmerman? Are these the reputable news organizations you are talking about? Quote
Hagar Posted March 25, 2017 Author Report Posted March 25, 2017 1 hour ago, westend1 said: Translation. No. No reputable news organization vetted this. Looks fake. Might be real. My guess. Heavily edited Probably not what you'd consider reputable. The ones you consider reputable are the same one who didn't report on the 14 year old HS girl being raped in a HS bathroom by two illegal aliens, one 17 and the other 18. Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted March 25, 2017 Report Posted March 25, 2017 16 minutes ago, westend1 said: Crickets. No new source. Thanks We're just pointing out how naive you are about your news outlets and vetting. Quote
westend1 Posted March 25, 2017 Report Posted March 25, 2017 4 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said: We're just pointing out how naive you are about your news outlets and vetting. Naive is taking one questionable source and accepting it Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted March 25, 2017 Report Posted March 25, 2017 4 minutes ago, westend1 said: Naive is taking one questionable source and accepting it This was my first post on here..." Sadly, if true, this won't hurt Facebook." Naive is thinking your favorite news outlets are the champions of vetting. Quote
texanabroad Posted March 25, 2017 Report Posted March 25, 2017 Whether this is fake news or not, it touches on a serious issue in our society. The debate on this thread should be over whether there is a difference between hate speech and free speech and instead it is about whether a news source is reputable. The news source may not be reputable, but I believe the topic is very relevant and should be discussed. Quote
westend1 Posted March 25, 2017 Report Posted March 25, 2017 13 minutes ago, texanabroad said: Whether this is fake news or not, it touches on a serious issue in our society. The debate on this thread should be over whether there is a difference between hate speech and free speech and instead it is about whether a news source is reputable. The news source may not be reputable, but I believe the topic is very relevant and should be discussed. It has to be true to be relevant. iF true, I agree that it is wrong. I don't believe it is true. If it was, I think at least faux news would get in on it. Actually, I think fox doesn't outright lie. They just spin like msnbcMSNBC BLUEDOVE3 1 Quote
texanabroad Posted March 25, 2017 Report Posted March 25, 2017 I get what you are saying and mostly agree. I just felt like the reality in the accusation warranted debate. Any reasonable person knows Infowars isn't the most reputable source. westend1 1 Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted March 25, 2017 Report Posted March 25, 2017 47 minutes ago, westend1 said: It has to be true to be relevant. iF true, I agree that it is wrong. I don't believe it is true. If it was, I think at least faux news would get in on it. Actually, I think fox doesn't outright lie. They just spin like msnbcMSNBC But CNN and ABC don't...lol. Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted March 25, 2017 Report Posted March 25, 2017 1 hour ago, texanabroad said: Whether this is fake news or not, it touches on a serious issue in our society. The debate on this thread should be over whether there is a difference between hate speech and free speech and instead it is about whether a news source is reputable. The news source may not be reputable, but I believe the topic is very relevant and should be discussed. I agree...that's the most overused reason to dodge a debate by the libs...even if the source is very reputable. Liberalism is very hard to defend, but c'mon...make an effort...don't kill the messenger. Quote
westend1 Posted March 25, 2017 Report Posted March 25, 2017 8 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said: But CNN and ABC don't...lol. You have to get news from somewhere. Tell us where you go Quote
texanabroad Posted March 25, 2017 Report Posted March 25, 2017 4 minutes ago, westend1 said: You have to get news from somewhere. Tell us where you go Living outside the states has forced me to work to find reputable news. I can't sit down and turn on the television and get my news. What I have found is that it is important to get your news from a variety of different sources and come to your own conclusion. There is normally a shred of truth in most reports, sometimes even CNN(very rarely). Compare that to what another source reports and you can start to put the pieces together. This whole Fake News is a new invention by the media to bring people back in from alternative media. They have all been biased for a very long time. True journalism ended with the 24 hour news networks. PAMFAM10 1 Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted March 25, 2017 Report Posted March 25, 2017 28 minutes ago, westend1 said: You have to get news from somewhere. Tell us where you go Usually start with Fox, but google to see how others report and if different, why. When I say Fox, I don't mean Hannity, O'Reilly, or Kelly...I mean the hard news, internet, not a TV fan...although I like Brett Baird. I simply don't trust CNN anymore. Quote
BLUEDOVE3 Posted March 25, 2017 Report Posted March 25, 2017 2 hours ago, texanabroad said: I get what you are saying and mostly agree. I just felt like the reality in the accusation warranted debate. Any reasonable person knows Infowars isn't the most reputable source. Over half of the right on this site aren't sensible, trust me Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.