Some Government Operations...

[LumRaiderFan]

14 minutes ago, westend1 said:

Don't read it if you don't want to.  Just trying to dispel the uranium myth

So what do you make of the millions of dollars that the investors involved with Uranium One "donated" to the Clinton foundation prior to the deal?

 

[westend1]

31 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

So what do you make of the millions of dollars that the investors involved with Uranium One "donated" to the Clinton foundation prior to the deal?

 

People donate to charity for various reasons.  It's a big leap to think that years later, they knew it would somehow get Clinton and 13 other unknown people to not disapprove a contract. 

[LumRaiderFan]

37 minutes ago, westend1 said:

People donate to charity for various reasons.  It's a big leap to think that years later, they knew it would somehow get Clinton and 13 other unknown people to not disapprove a contract. 

Really???  You don't think they think that far ahead...so they simply liked the Clintons that much.

I guess it was a coincidence when Warren Buffett bought railroads ahead (years) of all the oil being brought down by rail?

The "various reasons" they donated are very clear...I wonder if they're still donating to the foundation for their good work?

[Englebert]

1 hour ago, westend1 said:

People donate to charity for various reasons.  It's a big leap to think that years later, they knew it would somehow get Clinton and 13 other unknown people to not disapprove a contract. 

I posted this earlier in this thread:

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

This is from the New York Times, who is not exactly a Right wing extremist outfit...instead the polar opposite. By this post and lack of comment I'm assuming you missed this article.

Do you find it worrisome or just extremely coincidental that many people involved with this deal, including the Russians, made substantial "donations" to the Clinton Foundation during the negotiations? And is it just coincidental that many of the donations have plummeted since Clinton lost the election? Frankly I haven't read enough about the situation to form an opinion, but when the New York Times publishes an article that seemingly goes against one of their fellow Liberals, it makes me think their might be something more than just coincidence.

[Tigers2010]

49 minutes ago, Englebert said:

I posted this earlier in this thread:

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

This is from the New York Times, who is not exactly a Right wing extremist outfit...instead the polar opposite. By this post and lack of comment I'm assuming you missed this article.

Do you find it worrisome or just extremely coincidental that many people involved with this deal, including the Russians, made substantial "donations" to the Clinton Foundation during the negotiations? And is it just coincidental that many of the donations have plummeted since Clinton lost the election? Frankly I haven't read enough about the situation to form an opinion, but when the New York Times publishes an article that seemingly goes against one of their fellow Liberals, it makes me think their might be something more than just coincidence.

You will get no meaningful response from any of our Dems on this. Don't hold your breath.

[westend1]

Maybe I misread it.  It looks as though the bulk of the donations came from the founders of the company.   Canadians