A Simple Health Care Plan.

[nappyroots]

Big pharma's pockets are much deeper than average sick folk and people with pre-existing conditions.  So republicans will definitely go with the money. 

[nappyroots]

18 hours ago, Englebert said:

Don't try to project your hate on Republicans. Most aren't as cynical as you. If you want examples of people that don't care about other people and are full of hate, just pick out any Liberal to analyze. You know nothing about Republicans. Spout your negative stereotypes elsewhere. It's getting old and tiresome. On second thought, your feeble rants are what keep this board entertaining. Please continue.

Its people like you that make me take a timeout and post every now and then

[Englebert]

1 hour ago, nappyroots said:

Its people like you that make me take a timeout and post every now and then

Please explain "people like me". What characteristics do you think I harbor that keep you coming back. Is it the fact that I'll call you out without fear when you spew your hate-filled negative stereotypes at groups you don't agree with? Please elaborate, I need a chuckle this morning.

[Englebert]

1 hour ago, nappyroots said:

Big pharma's pockets are much deeper than average sick folk and people with pre-existing conditions.  So republicans will definitely go with the money. 

Is that why Obama is all of a sudden buddy-buddy with Wall Street and taking their money?

[stevenash]

I'm glad big pharma has deep pockets.  that is what brings research and development of new life saving drugs, etc.   I am also thankful that British Petroleum had deep pockets so all of the lawsuits didn't have to be settled/funded by bailout from govt/taxpayers.

[Tigers2010]

I love when these guys post from the Huffington Post.

[Englebert]

2 minutes ago, Tigers2010 said:

I love when these guys post from the Huffington Post.

What's hilarious is that some will attack the source of an article, scream Fake News, then post an article from the Huffington Post just minutes later. 

[stevenash]

2 hours ago, Englebert said:

What's hilarious is that some will attack the source of an article, scream Fake News, then post an article from the Huffington Post just minutes later. 

:):):):):):)

[new tobie]

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

This is why i believe in the pre- existing condition part of the ACA. Don't care whats done with the rest. It probably can't overcome the politician payouts from the pharmaceutical and health industry

[baddog]

Everyone keeps downing Trump for failed attempts at replacing Obamacare. What would you rather have..... People who will not put a plan in place because it isn't quite right or have one bullrushed through in the middle of the night that becomes the white elephant? 

You know, the one you can lie about your income and get coverage even though you can afford your own insurance.

[nappyroots]

1 hour ago, baddog said:

Everyone keeps downing Trump for failed attempts at replacing Obamacare. What would you rather have..... People who will not put a plan in place because it isn't quite right or have one bullrushed through in the middle of the night that becomes the white elephant? 

You know, the one you can lie about your income and get coverage even though you can afford your own insurance.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

I like what Trump says he wants to do with pre-existing conditions, just gotta keep the likes of Paul Ryan and co. away from it.

[LumRaiderFan]

On 4/27/2017 at 6:40 AM, nappyroots said:

Big pharma's pockets are much deeper than average sick folk and people with pre-existing conditions.  So republicans will definitely go with the money. 

Why are the average folk (myself) entitled to anyone's "deep" pockets?

It's their money, right?

[new tobie]

Trump and the swamp people trying to return limits to how much the insurance companies will have to pay for an illness while screwing folks with pre-existing conditions at the same time. Thanks Trump and Ryan.

[LumRaiderFan]

52 minutes ago, new tobie said:

Trump and the swamp people trying to return limits to how much the insurance companies will have to pay for an illness while screwing folks with pre-existing conditions at the same time. Thanks Trump and Ryan.

So should I be able to insure my car after I get in a wreck?

[westend1]

Republican legislators liked this policy well enough to offer it in a new amendment. They do not, however, seem to like it enough to have it apply to themselves and their staff. A spokesperson for Rep. Tom MacArthur (R-NJ), who authored this amendment, confirmed this was the case: Members of Congress and their staff would get the guarantee of keeping these Obamacare regulations. Health law expert Tim Jost flagged this particular issue to me.

[Tigers2010]

37 minutes ago, westend1 said:

Republican legislators liked this policy well enough to offer it in a new amendment. They do not, however, seem to like it enough to have it apply to themselves and their staff. A spokesperson for Rep. Tom MacArthur (R-NJ), who authored this amendment, confirmed this was the case: Members of Congress and their staff would get the guarantee of keeping these Obamacare regulations. Health law expert Tim Jost flagged this particular issue to me.

Didn't the Obama administration exempt themselves from this atrocity of what is ObamaCare? 

[stevenash]

2 minutes ago, Tigers2010 said:

Didn't the Obama administration exempt themselves from this atrocity of what is ObamaCare? 

that's different

 

[baddog]

1 hour ago, westend1 said:

Republican legislators liked this policy well enough to offer it in a new amendment. They do not, however, seem to like it enough to have it apply to themselves and their staff. A spokesperson for Rep. Tom MacArthur (R-NJ), who authored this amendment, confirmed this was the case: Members of Congress and their staff would get the guarantee of keeping these Obamacare regulations. Health law expert Tim Jost flagged this particular issue to me.

How can this post have any grit? Like Tiger said, Obama administration was exempt, so "where's the beef"?