Jump to content

Susan Rice requested to unmask names of Trump transition officials, sources say


LumRaiderFan

Recommended Posts

And, as happens every afternoon, the CBS News lead story was derogatory toward Trump.  The above story was 3 or 4 down the line, and when Scott Pelley ask a young lady reporter on site to report, the lady started then stuttered.  Finally ending with, "Sources say that there was nothing improper about it".   Which is the exact opposite of the Fox sources.  

For now, most conservatives believe Fox, and the Liberals will believe CBS.  Since I watch CBS every evening, and watch Fox even more, it's a no brainer, Fox is more reliable.  CBS leads with an anti-Trump story everyday.  North Korea could nuke Hawaii, and CBS would lead their news with an Anti-Trump story.  Smh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, REBgp said:

And, as happens every afternoon, the CBS News lead story was derogatory toward Trump.  The above story was 3 or 4 down the line, and when Scott Pelley ask a young lady reporter on site to report, the lady started then stuttered.  Finally ending with, "Sources say that there was nothing improper about it".   Which is the exact opposite of the Fox sources.  

For now, most conservatives believe Fox, and the Liberals will believe CBS.  Since I watch CBS every evening, and watch Fox even more, it's a no brainer, Fox is more reliable.  CBS leads with an anti-Trump story everyday.  North Korea could nuke Hawaii, and CBS would lead their news with an Anti-Trump story.  Smh

Hawaii being nuked would be Trump's fault, according to the left. Obama did nothing about Korea and Clinton called it sabre rattling. Nukes with the potential to reach U.S. mainland and a murderer crazy enough to launch them is no joking matter at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, baddog said:

Hawaii being nuked would be Trump's fault, according to the left. Obama did nothing about Korea and Clinton called it sabre rattling. Nukes with the potential to reach U.S. mainland and a murderer crazy enough to launch them is no joking matter at all.

And in the near future, thanks to Obama (and he was so blatant about it), Iran will have nukes.  May be a while before they have ICBM's, but they might get one of them suitcase jobs over here.  Nope, no joking matter.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have still yet to get an answer on what the Liberals think the Russians did to subvert our elections. All they can muster is that Trump colluded with the Russians, the Russians hacked the DNC, and that 17 intelligence agencies agree on this. They have zero evidence of anything, won't define what "colluded" means, but keep pushing the narrative. Well it looks like that effort might come back to bite them. The Obama administration is looking more and more guilty each and every day. Now that Obama and the Democrats are no longer in charge, they won't be able to easily suppress the evidence, albeit the government agencies are still full of corrupt Liberals that think they are bullet-proof. If Susan Rice was a Republican she would have already been convicted by the Liberal press because of her past and very public lies. Let's see if her party affiliation can save her on this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason you have not gotten the answer is because there isn't one.  The Russians did not make the "deplorable" statement.  The Russians did not keep Mrs. Clinton from campaigning in states she thought were automatic victories.  The Russians did not force her to sign on to the Benghazi video narrative.  And the Russians did not force her to tell parents of the Benghazi decedents to be comforted by the fact that "we will get that video guy" for this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, stevenash said:

The reason you have not gotten the answer is because there isn't one.  The Russians did not make the "deplorable" statement.  The Russians did not keep Mrs. Clinton from campaigning in states she thought were automatic victories.  The Russians did not force her to sign on to the Benghazi video narrative.  And the Russians did not force her to tell parents of the Benghazi decedents to be comforted by the fact that "we will get that video guy" for this.

Sane people know this, I'm asking for the Liberal explanation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stevenash said:

I can provide that for you also.  Trump is a racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, mysogynistic liar who spouted some locker room talk 12 years ago.

You forgot Islamophobic, and probably some other phobes & nistics lol.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Englebert said:

I just heard the quote of the year, uttered by Greg Gutfeld when speaking about his view of the Liberal viewpoint concerning Susan Rice: "When you're a Republican, it's Watergate. When you're a Democrat, it's water under the bridge."

lol...very true. 

I guess the expectation of corruption comes in handy sometimes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Englebert said:

I just heard the quote of the year, uttered by Greg Gutfeld when speaking about his view of the Liberal viewpoint concerning Susan Rice: "When you're a Republican, it's Watergate. When you're a Democrat, it's water under the bridge."

Would that be the Chappaquiddick bridge? Most libs on here don't even know what that is. Thanks Google.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BLUEDOVE3 said:

See, this is why your party is having the problems it's having. But yall can't help it. It's like a drug habit. It's in yall's  DNA. Yall still haven't learned after all these years. God don't like ugly !!! 

I agree Dove...but you guys keep doing what you're doing...you're doing great!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, BLUEDOVE3 said:

See, this is why your party is having the problems it's having. But yall can't help it. It's like a drug habit. It's in yall's  DNA. Yall still haven't learned after all these years. God don't like ugly !!! 

Is throwing out baseless and false negative stereotypes considered ugly in God's view? Is personal attacks designed to shut down free speech considered ugly in God's view? If so, Liberals are in for a world of hurt.

You think the Republicans are having problems because you confine yourself to news from wing-nut Liberal sources. I bet you didn't even know that Democrats have lost over 1000 seats in the last eight years. If you knew that fact, you wouldn't have embarrassed yourself by making that asinine comment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,093
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Split Down The Bayou
    Newest Member
    Split Down The Bayou
    Joined


  • Posts

    • I was making fun of the fact that Reagan will look at 500 polls that show Harris leading, then finds ONE that shows Trump ahead and posts it here, proudly yelling “SEE?!!!! TOO BIG TO RIG!!!” While ignoring the 500 that show quite clearly what’s about to happen.     
    • What was the 1st thing biden did when he got into office concerning jobs
    • When has she ever ran anything to know how to run anything?  
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up From the article: Vice President Kamala Harris' tax plan could cost the U.S. economy nearly 800,000 jobs, a new analysis by the Tax Foundation finds. Harris' tax plan, which contains a variety of tax increases, cuts and credits, is based largely on President Biden's budget – though the vice president has offered her own policy ideas since becoming the Democratic presidential nominee.  Overall, the Tax Foundation analysis finds a loss of 786,000 full-time equivalent jobs over the long run under Harris' plan when compared to baseline projections, as well as 2% decline in long-run GDP and a 1.2% dip in long-run wages, while bringing in nearly $1.7 trillion in additional tax revenue over the next decade. "Similar to the president's proposals, we find that it would reduce the long-term growth of the economy, it would reduce American incomes relative to where they would otherwise be, and it would lose, rounding up, close to 800,000 jobs in the long-run," Garrett Watson, senior policy analyst and modeling manager at the Tax Foundation, told FOX Business in an interview.
    • While some on the forum does not like Gutfeld, Trumps appearance on the show gave them their largest viewership in the history of the show.....4.9 million I mentioned in another post, more people need to see that side of Trumps personality.  I think they did. While I thought it would be mostly conservative viewers, turns out I was completely wrong.  According to a data collected from viewers for the month of July, around 575,000 viewers who identify as Democrats tuned into This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  which airs weeknights at 10 p.m., ahead of other late night programs. Fallon’s  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  and  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  brought in approximately 396,000 and 434,000 Democratic viewers, respectively, by comparison. Gutfeld! also drew a higher average of Democrats than Real Time with Bill Maher and The Daily Show, which hit 333,000 and 183,000, respectively.   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...