Jump to content

Wow

baddog

By baddog
in Political Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

PAMFAM10

PAMFAM10

Posted
Posted

.... Still no mushroom cloud. Say I play with play doh say I'm too compassionate. Say I'm a sheep. Koolaid drinker Etc. My question was still no Mushroom cloud. Which went unanswered.

i don't care who voted for the invasion Bush was our commander in chief. Bush spoke that false narrative of mushroom clouds over our cities. 

So don't make a thread like chemical weapons which been around since before ww1 justifies the big fat lie bush fed the American people.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BS Wildcats

BS Wildcats

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, PAMFAM10 said:

.... Still no mushroom cloud. Say I play with play doh say I'm too compassionate. Say I'm a sheep. Koolaid drinker Etc. My question was still no Mushroom cloud. Which went unanswered.

i don't care who voted for the invasion Bush was our commander in chief. Bush spoke that false narrative of mushroom clouds over our cities. 

So don't make a thread like chemical weapons which been around since before ww1 justifies the big fat lie bush fed the American people.

 

So, in your opinion, there has to be a mushroom cloud to call something a WMD.  That's just plain stupid on your part!  It's a good thing Bush had the balls to do something about 9/11.  We know what the coward, draw a line in the sand, would have done.  NOTHING!!  Thank you, President Bush!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LumRaiderFan

LumRaiderFan

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, PAMFAM10 said:

.... Still no mushroom cloud. Say I play with play doh say I'm too compassionate. Say I'm a sheep. Koolaid drinker Etc. My question was still no Mushroom cloud. Which went unanswered.

i don't care who voted for the invasion Bush was our commander in chief. Bush spoke that false narrative of mushroom clouds over our cities. 

So don't make a thread like chemical weapons which been around since before ww1 justifies the big fat lie bush fed the American people.

 

You are really putting your young ignorance on display with this post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PAMFAM10

PAMFAM10

Posted
Posted

It is what it is bush was talking nukes. Not chemicals. Yes thank you Bush for a pointless war. Thousands of troops lost lives, why?

Im not down playing the use of chemicals. Let's just admit the intel was wrong on what bush described as WMD's. 

And I say Bush because he was president. Hillary and all the others should at least admit that much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined


  • Posts

    • TxHoops
      Susan Smith

      By TxHoops · Posted

      I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an easy and obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • setxathlete14
      2024 WOS Mustangs

      By setxathlete14 · Posted

      1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
    • Reagan
      Trump Wins

      By Reagan · Posted

      AMEN!
    • Reagan
      JoeBama Administration Gives NGOs Millions To Facilitate Immigration Invasion!

      By Reagan · Posted

      @CIS_org National Security Senior Fellow @BensmanTodd tells Steve Bannon how the U.S. State Department and USAID have been sending American taxpayer funds to religious nonprofits to facilitate mass immigration to our southern border. Bensman says 248 nonprofits are participating in the United Nations’ 2024 agenda to distribute $1.6 billion in cash, transportation, food, and shelter to U.S.-bound immigrants across Mexico and Latin America.
    • SmashMouth
      2024 WOS Mustangs

      By SmashMouth · Posted

      👍 Oh. I was thinking most thought Wrong Place Wrong Time. Lol. 

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...