Jump to content

biggirl, tobie -- What Say You?!


Reagan

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, Big girl said:

Define socialism.

I find it hard to believe a person that is capable of ascertaining Trump's psychological profile, with no formal training, is oblivious to the straightforward steps of querying the internet for a simple word definition. Luckily we have some caring, compassionate people such as REBgp to help you out with that flabbergasting task. Of course, the websites you visit might have a completely different definition. If so, why don't you post and we will discuss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Englebert said:

I find it hard to believe a person that is capable of ascertaining Trump's psychological profile, with no formal training, is oblivious to the straightforward steps of querying the internet for a simple word definition. Luckily we have some caring, compassionate people such as REBgp to help you out with that flabbergasting task. Of course, the websites you visit might have a completely different definition. If so, why don't you post and we will discuss.

You know big buddy, I'd guess I've seen at least ten post from the left today, and I can't remember any on thread topic yet.  It's another one of life's mysteries for me to ponder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Big girl said:

 

 

If I write a check that I can't cover, the check bounces, I have to cover the check, and pay a penalty. Democrats call this deficit spending.

WHEN HAVE THE DEMOCRATS DONE ANYTHING FOR VETERANS? As their dommander-in-chief, Obama wouldn't even salute them. What a POS!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Big girl said:

 

 

Again -- occupydemocrats!   biggirl -- these people are so far left that everything looks right to them!  Democrats are a hateful bunch to use our fine veterans for political gains when EVERYONE knows they care NOTHING about our veterans!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, what an short sighted and just flat out lie you just posted Big Girl. When the government gives tax breaks to job creators, it is to enable these businesses to expand, thus putting people to work. This serves as dual purpose: to provide a paycheck to many and concurrently getting them off of the government dole, saving the taxpayer money and raking in more tax dollars. The American tax payer does not foot the bill. When Democrats try to help, they confiscate money from hard working tax payers to form an agency that wastes most of the leveraged money through incompetence and corruption. They then throw what money is left over at a problem in which they perform no oversight on who is qualified and in need of these services, and who is gaming the system. Read you history books if you don't believe me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And the moral of the story Big Girl, is 1- There's not a single Democrat politician that knows anything about economics, or 2- They do know and their intention is to ruin America financially.  Imo, it's 2.  Whatever direction they can take to do so, be it thru finance, judicially, morality, it doesn't matter.  If (when) they bring America to its knees, we'll be the crown jewel in the new one world government.  Jmo.

PS:  Feel free to laugh at this.  I use to laugh at it to until I started seeing the evidence piling up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Englebert said:

Wow, what an short sighted and just flat out lie you just posted Big Girl. When the government gives tax breaks to job creators, it is to enable these businesses to expand, thus putting people to work. This serves as dual purpose: to provide a paycheck to many and concurrently getting them off of the government dole, saving the taxpayer money and raking in more tax dollars. The American tax payer does not foot the bill. When Democrats try to help, they confiscate money from hard working tax payers to form an agency that wastes most of the leveraged money through incompetence and corruption. They then throw what money is left over at a problem in which they perform no oversight on who is qualified and in need of these services, and who is gaming the system. Read you history books if you don't believe me.

If Trump gets a huge tax break on his personal taxes, how does that help to produce jobs? His corporations are separate entities and are prople too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Big girl said:

If Trump gets a huge tax break on his personal taxes, how does that help to produce jobs? His corporations are separate entities and are prople too.

Democrats that contributed to the Clinton Foundation are allowed to use this as a kind of tax break.  Do you agree with that?  Really, there is no difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, stevenash said:

Big Girl- If you own a corporation and you need to expand but are not sure you can afford it, would a tax cut make you more likely or less likely to be able to expand?

But the rich need to pay more.  The left does not realize the rich own businesses, therefore creating employment.  Tax the hell out of the until they close or leave the country.  Dumbarse Democrats!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,093
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Split Down The Bayou
    Newest Member
    Split Down The Bayou
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Where do I begin: To start this was a gritty win from my Bulldogs. Nothing pretty about the brand of football they played last night. Just hard nosed, lunch pail football on both sides. DEFENSE...WE HAVE A DEFENSE THAT CAN STOP THE RUN! Offense had to shuffle 2-3 pieces on the OL due to injuries and the running game just wasn't there like it was the first 3 weeks of the season. But the short passing game picked up the slack. Bellville did a great job of containing our speed for the most part and I give props to our coaching staff for being patient and taking what was given to them. This is without a doubt a loss in either of the last two seasons because we would have been trying to throw deep balls vs a prevent defense and Chubby would have been running for his life.  I am a super proud Bulldog this morning. Bellville will be fine,  those coaches over there deserve the benefit of the doubt to fix the problems they have going on. I thought overall they just weren't used to the team speed that we had up front. We were able to get a lot of penetration to throw off timing on their run schemes. I think Hitchcock put 3A on notice last night that this isn't the last 2 years ball club that's all finesse. We can bite now!
    • I was making fun of the fact that Reagan will look at 500 polls that show Harris leading, then finds ONE that shows Trump ahead and posts it here, proudly yelling “SEE?!!!! TOO BIG TO RIG!!!” While ignoring the 500 that show quite clearly what’s about to happen.     
    • What was the 1st thing biden did when he got into office concerning jobs
    • When has she ever ran anything to know how to run anything?  
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up From the article: Vice President Kamala Harris' tax plan could cost the U.S. economy nearly 800,000 jobs, a new analysis by the Tax Foundation finds. Harris' tax plan, which contains a variety of tax increases, cuts and credits, is based largely on President Biden's budget – though the vice president has offered her own policy ideas since becoming the Democratic presidential nominee.  Overall, the Tax Foundation analysis finds a loss of 786,000 full-time equivalent jobs over the long run under Harris' plan when compared to baseline projections, as well as 2% decline in long-run GDP and a 1.2% dip in long-run wages, while bringing in nearly $1.7 trillion in additional tax revenue over the next decade. "Similar to the president's proposals, we find that it would reduce the long-term growth of the economy, it would reduce American incomes relative to where they would otherwise be, and it would lose, rounding up, close to 800,000 jobs in the long-run," Garrett Watson, senior policy analyst and modeling manager at the Tax Foundation, told FOX Business in an interview.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...