stevenash Posted April 6, 2017 Report Share Posted April 6, 2017 ISTANBUL—Autopsy results of three victims of This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up suggest the banned chemical agent sarin was the cause of death, Turkey’s heath ministry said Thursday. A Turkish criminal forensics team, with United Nations specialists observing, examined three Syrians who died after being brought to Turkey for treatment following the attack on the village of Khan Sheikhoun. The death toll is This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up . The United Nations Children’s Fund said at least 27 of those killed were children and approximately 550 others, including many children, were injured. Turkey’s Health Ministry said in a statement that the autopsies showed that victims suffered excess fluid in the lungs, increased lung weight and internal bleeding before death, which it said was suggestive of poisoning by sarin. It didn’t provide any further details, or reasons why the ministry is pointing to sarin as opposed to other nerve agents or poisonous gases. “Based on the test results, evidence was detected in patients which leads one to think they were exposed to a chemical substance [sarin],” the ministry said. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS Wildcats Posted April 6, 2017 Report Share Posted April 6, 2017 If this did not create a mushroom cloud, it is not a WMD! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted April 6, 2017 Author Report Share Posted April 6, 2017 My point exactly!!!! :):):) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS Wildcats Posted April 6, 2017 Report Share Posted April 6, 2017 I doubt they would know a WMD if it hit them in the face. Hell, liberals think an AR-15 is a machine gun. They probably think AR means assault rifle. Idiots Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted April 6, 2017 Author Report Share Posted April 6, 2017 26 minutes ago, BS Wildcats said: I doubt they would know a WMD if it hit them in the face. Hell, liberals think an AR-15 is a machine gun. They probably think AR means assault rifle. Idiots Excuse me but I believe one of the "enlightened" spells that word idoits! BS Wildcats 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted April 7, 2017 Report Share Posted April 7, 2017 If it were a weapon of MASS destruction, it wouldve killed more than 85 people. How many people did the atomic bomb kill? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LumRaiderFan Posted April 7, 2017 Report Share Posted April 7, 2017 3 hours ago, Big girl said: If it were a weapon of MASS destruction, it wouldve killed more than 85 people. How many people did the atomic bomb kill? Give us a number...exact number...how may have to be killed to be considered a WMD? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS Wildcats Posted April 7, 2017 Report Share Posted April 7, 2017 24 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said: Give us a number...exact number...how may have to be killed to be considered a WMD? Has to have a mushroom cloud Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted April 7, 2017 Author Report Share Posted April 7, 2017 6 minutes ago, BS Wildcats said: Has to have a mushroom cloud Ain't "enlightenment" wonderful? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LumRaiderFan Posted April 7, 2017 Report Share Posted April 7, 2017 11 minutes ago, BS Wildcats said: Has to have a mushroom cloud I guess so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peppermint Patty Posted April 7, 2017 Report Share Posted April 7, 2017 26 minutes ago, BS Wildcats said: Has to have a mushroom cloud I think these "mushroom clouds" might be the Left's problem. BS Wildcats, Englebert, LumRaiderFan and 2 others 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted April 7, 2017 Author Report Share Posted April 7, 2017 :):):):):) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hagar Posted April 7, 2017 Report Share Posted April 7, 2017 5 hours ago, Big girl said: If it were a weapon of MASS destruction, it wouldve killed more than 85 people. How many people did the atomic bomb kill? You do realize that the people on this Forum aren't responsible for deciding what is referred to as weapons of mass destruction? And for your edification the atomic bomb killed approximately 129,000 people, while the conventional bombing of Tokyo killed up to 200,000. As with all weapons, those used for delivering Chemical Agents are made in different strengths. There's no doubt that Syria has enough of these to easily kill everyone in NYC. Even you would have to admit that was mass destruction of human life. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Englebert 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted April 8, 2017 Report Share Posted April 8, 2017 21 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said: Give us a number...exact number...how may have to be killed to be considered a WMD? Ted Bundy killed more people than that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted April 8, 2017 Report Share Posted April 8, 2017 mass mas/ noun . the majority of. "the great mass of the population had little interest in the project" synonyms: This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up , greater part/number, best/better part, major part, This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up , main body, This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up ; This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up "the mass of our students are licensed drivers" adjective 1. relating to, done by, or affecting large numbers of people or things. IS 87 PEOPLE THE MAJORITY OF THE PEOPLE? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted April 8, 2017 Report Share Posted April 8, 2017 weap·on of mass de·struc·tion noun plural noun: weapons of mass destruction a chemical, biological or radioactive weapon capable of causing widespread death and destruction. In my opinion a chemical that kills only 87 people is not a weapon of MASS destruction Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hagar Posted April 8, 2017 Report Share Posted April 8, 2017 27 minutes ago, Big girl said: weap·on of mass de·struc·tion noun plural noun: weapons of mass destruction a chemical, biological or radioactive weapon capable of causing widespread death and destruction. In my opinion a chemical that kills only 87 people is not a weapon of MASS destruction Did you even read my post? They could have easily killed everyone of the people in that town with chemical weapons. WMD is not based on how many you kill, it's based on how many you can kill. In your definition above, capable of causing widespread death. North Korea has detonated at least 5 nuclear weapons, and no one was killed and no damage done. Still, nuclear weapons is a WMD. You only lose more credibility when you try to defend a preconceived opinion that is totally wrong, by anyone's definition. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baddog Posted April 8, 2017 Report Share Posted April 8, 2017 1 hour ago, REBgp said: Did you even read my post? They could have easily killed everyone of the people in that town with chemical weapons. WMD is not based on how many you kill, it's based on how many you can kill. In your definition above, capable of causing widespread death. North Korea has detonated at least 5 nuclear weapons, and no one was killed and no damage done. Still, nuclear weapons is a WMD. You only lose more credibility when you try to defend a preconceived opinion that is totally wrong, by anyone's definition. She is also unaware of how many conditions have to be met. Windage, elevation, strength, as you mentioned, all of these things combined have to be right to achieve the maximum effect. She probably didn't learn that at Vista college. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LumRaiderFan Posted April 9, 2017 Report Share Posted April 9, 2017 10 hours ago, Big girl said: mass mas/ noun . the majority of. "the great mass of the population had little interest in the project" synonyms: This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up , greater part/number, best/better part, major part, This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up , main body, This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up ; This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up "the mass of our students are licensed drivers" adjective 1. relating to, done by, or affecting large numbers of people or things. IS 87 PEOPLE THE MAJORITY OF THE PEOPLE? Really? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.