Jump to content

Russia


stevenash

Recommended Posts

WASHINGTON—Russia has been carrying out a “disinformation campaign” to try to cover up for the suspected

This is the hidden content, please
, senior White House officials said Tuesday, adding the U.S. has concluded the Syrian military used banned sarin gas in the assault.

As Secretary of State Rex Tillerson arrived in Moscow for high-level talks, White House officials on Tuesday added to pressure against Moscow by questioning Russia’s role in the attack and suggested that it may have known that its ally Syria was preparing to use sarin.

Officials said there is no U.S. intelligence consensus on whether Russia had advance knowledge of the attack. But they also said it seems implausible that Moscow wouldn’t have known given the close military cooperation between the two countries.

 

Russian and Syrian forces work side-by-side at the airfield used to launch the attack, raising suspicions among White House and Pentagon officials that Russia may have known what was coming.

“We do think that it is a question worth asking the Russians about: How is it possible that their forces were co-located with the Syrian forces that planned, prepared and carried out this chemical weapons attack at the same installation and did not have foreknowledge?” said one of the officials.

The chemical attack April 4 killed at least 85 people.

Syria repeatedly has denied using chemical weapons in the attack, and Moscow has suggested that the Syrian airstrike hit a chemical weapons depot used by rebels.

On Tuesday, the White House dismissed the Russian allegation as baseless disinformation meant to obfuscate Syria’s culpability in the attack.

“It’s clear that the Russians are trying to cover up the attack,” said one senior White House official.

U.S. officials say a Syrian SU-22 warplane dropped one bomb filled with sarin gas on the rebel-held village of Khan Sheikhoun. After the attack, Pentagon officials said they saw a Russian drone flying over the area, then a second Russian-made plane carried out an airstrike on a field hospital where many victims were taken for treatment.

It is unclear if a Russian or Syrian pilot carried out the second attack, White House officials said.

After seeing graphic images of children killed in the chemical attack, President Donald Trump ordered a cruise missile attack Friday on the Shayrat airfield, believed to be home to the pilots who carried out the airstrikes.

The U.S. military launched nearly 60 missiles in an attempt to deter President Bashar al-Assad from using chemical weapons again.

The strike didn’t damage the airfield runways or target suspected sarin gas storage sites at the base, making it possible for Syria to keep using the banned chemicals.

White House officials said Syrian personnel associated with the regime’s chemical weapons program were at Shayrat airfield in late March, and on April 4.

 

On the day of the American cruise missile strikes, U.S. officials warned Russians that an attack on Shayrat airfield was coming, giving them an opportunity to get their personnel at the base to safety.

The U.S. didn’t strike parts of the base where Russians work, an intentional move designed to focus attention on Syria.

White House officials said there was no evidence to back up Russia’s contention that a rebel chemical weapons storage site was hit in the strike and called on Moscow to stop obfuscating, work with the U.S. and ensure that Syria follows through on its commitment to get rid of all of its chemical weapons, sometimes known as WMDs, or weapons of mass destruction.

“This is an opportunity for the Russians to choose to stop the disinformation campaign…and eliminate WMDs together,” said one of the White House officials.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,093
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Split Down The Bayou
    Newest Member
    Split Down The Bayou
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Where do I begin: To start this was a gritty win from my Bulldogs. Nothing pretty about the brand of football they played last night. Just hard nosed, lunch pail football on both sides. DEFENSE...WE HAVE A DEFENSE THAT CAN STOP THE RUN! Offense had to shuffle 2-3 pieces on the OL due to injuries and the running game just wasn't there like it was the first 3 weeks of the season. But the short passing game picked up the slack. Bellville did a great job of containing our speed for the most part and I give props to our coaching staff for being patient and taking what was given to them. This is without a doubt a loss in either of the last two seasons because we would have been trying to throw deep balls vs a prevent defense and Chubby would have been running for his life.  I am a super proud Bulldog this morning. Bellville will be fine,  those coaches over there deserve the benefit of the doubt to fix the problems they have going on. I thought overall they just weren't used to the team speed that we had up front. We were able to get a lot of penetration to throw off timing on their run schemes. I think Hitchcock put 3A on notice last night that this isn't the last 2 years ball club that's all finesse. We can bite now!
    • I was making fun of the fact that Reagan will look at 500 polls that show Harris leading, then finds ONE that shows Trump ahead and posts it here, proudly yelling “SEE?!!!! TOO BIG TO RIG!!!” While ignoring the 500 that show quite clearly what’s about to happen.     
    • What was the 1st thing biden did when he got into office concerning jobs
    • When has she ever ran anything to know how to run anything?  
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up From the article: Vice President Kamala Harris' tax plan could cost the U.S. economy nearly 800,000 jobs, a new analysis by the Tax Foundation finds. Harris' tax plan, which contains a variety of tax increases, cuts and credits, is based largely on President Biden's budget – though the vice president has offered her own policy ideas since becoming the Democratic presidential nominee.  Overall, the Tax Foundation analysis finds a loss of 786,000 full-time equivalent jobs over the long run under Harris' plan when compared to baseline projections, as well as 2% decline in long-run GDP and a 1.2% dip in long-run wages, while bringing in nearly $1.7 trillion in additional tax revenue over the next decade. "Similar to the president's proposals, we find that it would reduce the long-term growth of the economy, it would reduce American incomes relative to where they would otherwise be, and it would lose, rounding up, close to 800,000 jobs in the long-run," Garrett Watson, senior policy analyst and modeling manager at the Tax Foundation, told FOX Business in an interview.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...