Dummycrats to Block

[baddog]

the FBI nominee without even knowing who that may be. Unbelievable. Dims really follow Chump Schumer? REALLY????

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[Hagar]

21 hours ago, baddog said:

the FBI nominee without even knowing who that may be. Unbelievable. Dims really follow Chump Schumer? REALLY????

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

No doubt in my mind Larry the Cable Guy could do a better job than Schummer.

[new tobie]

On 5/15/2017 at 7:07 AM, baddog said:

the FBI nominee without even knowing who that may be. Unbelievable. Dims really follow Chump Schumer? REALLY????

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

That's exactly what the rehaticans did with Merrick Garland 

[baddog]

6 minutes ago, new tobie said:

That's exactly what the rehaticans did with Merrick Garland 

Wrong. They knew Garland. They were following the BIDEN rule.

[LumRaiderFan]

15 minutes ago, new tobie said:

That's exactly what the rehaticans did with Merrick Garland 

Not even close.

[Cougar14.2]

Man, how freaking funny is this thread now? LMAO! You have the top republican in the senate wanting to nominate Merrick Garland because he has conceded the White House and DOJ are so inept they can't pick an FBI director.

By the way, democrats don't want to block the FBI director's nomination just to block it. They first want Comey to testify in an open hearing as to the reasons he believed he was fired, then make a judgment based on that information as to who they should vote for. The problem the democrats have is the same problem the Alabama state legislature had with their governor. The person under investigation will get to appoint the person that will continue the investigation into their wrong doing. Again I just ask, imagine if this was Obama appointing someone to investigate him? The right would want to impeach him for obstruction of justice.   

[stevenash]

36 minutes ago, Cougar14.2 said:

Man, how freaking funny is this thread now? LMAO! You have the top republican in the senate wanting to nominate Merrick Garland because he has conceded the White House and DOJ are so inept they can't pick an FBI director.

By the way, democrats don't want to block the FBI director's nomination just to block it. They first want Comey to testify in an open hearing as to the reasons he believed he was fired, then make a judgment based on that information as to who they should vote for. The problem the democrats have is the same problem the Alabama state legislature had with their governor. The person under investigation will get to appoint the person that will continue the investigation into their wrong doing. Again I just ask, imagine if this was Obama appointing someone to investigate him? The right would want to impeach him for obstruction of justice.   

BS

[Cougar14.2]

10 minutes ago, stevenash said:

BS

Lol, republicans requested a closed hearing with Comey so when he aired out the president for asking him to be loyal to him it would be a he said she said while they tried to do their spin job about inevitable leaks. Comey refused and wants to testify in an open hearing so he can't be misquoted. Why hasn't this open hearing been schedule yet? You're right though, it's some straight up BS.

[stevenash]

6 minutes ago, Cougar14.2 said:

Lol, republicans requested a closed hearing with Comey so when he aired out the president for asking him to be loyal to him it would be a he said she said while they tried to do their spin job about inevitable leaks. Comey refused and wants to testify in an open hearing so he can't be misquoted. Why hasn't this open hearing been schedule yet? You're right though, it's some straight up BS.

Perhaps that hearing will come around about the same time the prior administration promised to "investigate" the behavior of the IRS.