Hagar Posted June 7, 2017 Report Share Posted June 7, 2017 I See at least two red flags, although I'll bow to TVC's opinion because this is more in his line of work. Number one is the initial statement being a lie (smells). The second is who called the police. It's a KISD problem, yet neither the Supt, nor the head of the school board called. The mayor called. Makes you wonder who runs the KISD. For the sake of Mr. Reeves family, and the good people of Kirbyville, I hope someone finds out the truth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jv_coach Posted June 7, 2017 Report Share Posted June 7, 2017 Always remember this about Adminstration in Schools. They pay a lot of money to get a job that pays well and involves power, and they no longer have to teach classes. Am I saying a conspiracy is involved? No. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AHUDDLESTON Posted June 8, 2017 Report Share Posted June 8, 2017 they still have not confirmed suicide. Still waiting on gsr results. Since super arrived: ad left, asst. principal, and jr high principal. Shredding truck shows up day after order not to destroy. Video surveillance broken. 4 days to give a statement to police. If you read the asst pricipals resignation, he makes several points that I think could definitely win a civil suit if it was sought. rhino1877, 2wedge and jv_coach 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L-Train11 Posted June 8, 2017 Report Share Posted June 8, 2017 11 hours ago, AHUDDLESTON said: they still have not confirmed suicide. Still waiting on gsr results. Since super arrived: ad left, asst. principal, and jr high principal. Shredding truck shows up day after order not to destroy. Video surveillance broken. 4 days to give a statement to police. If you read the asst pricipals resignation, he makes several points that I think could definitely win a civil suit if it was sought. The only thing I didn't like about the assistants statement and the points he made was that they were already things that the public knew. When I read it I was hoping for some better "insider" information into what was really going on... to me it was just a recap of what the media is already saying. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvc184 Posted June 9, 2017 Report Share Posted June 9, 2017 22 hours ago, AHUDDLESTON said: they still have not confirmed suicide. Still waiting on gsr results. Since super arrived: ad left, asst. principal, and jr high principal. Shredding truck shows up day after order not to destroy. Video surveillance broken. 4 days to give a statement to police. If you read the asst pricipals resignation, he makes several points that I think could definitely win a civil suit if it was sought. I am surprised that they even did a GSR. Results might be conclusive if they did but not necessarily. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hagar Posted June 9, 2017 Report Share Posted June 9, 2017 Had a story on Ch 6 again tonight. Had the Family lawyer on. He had concerns about several aspects of the investigation, including the series of phone calls. Also, a group of concerned citizens went to the dump and dug out a bunch of stuff dumped out of the school. They'll probably post the story on their website. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2wedge Posted June 9, 2017 Report Share Posted June 9, 2017 On 6/8/2017 at 9:11 PM, AHUDDLESTON said: they still have not confirmed suicide. Still waiting on gsr results. Since super arrived: ad left, asst. principal, and jr high principal. Shredding truck shows up day after order not to destroy. Video surveillance broken. 4 days to give a statement to police. If you read the asst pricipals resignation, he makes several points that I think could definitely win a civil suit if it was sought. Just want to double check, are you insinuating that this might be a murder? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CardinalBacker Posted June 9, 2017 Report Share Posted June 9, 2017 4 hours ago, 2wedge said: Just want to double check, are you insinuating that this might be a murder? I can't speak for AHUDDLESTON, but many Kirbyville residents have openly questioned whether not Dr. Wallis could have pulled the trigger. The more this drags on, the worse it looks for Kirbyville. In most places, firing a principal for boofing his secretary is the only reasonable course of action... regardless of how charismatic the principal is. The good news is that all of the people of Kirbyville will get to share in any buyout of Dr. Wallis's contract should the school board opt to go a different way, and will no doubt pay for any settlement that the grieving family ends up receiving. So, when the citizens of Kirbyville are saying "I'll bring the diesel! You'uns fetch some matches! We'll meet up at the schoolhouse!!!," remember to yell "and we can all pay higher taxes!!!!" It's way too late for the school to replace a super, assistant super, high school principal, assistant high school principal, and junior high principal in less than two months. I doubt they can come up with enough candidates, much less good ones on such short notice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hagar Posted June 10, 2017 Report Share Posted June 10, 2017 6 hours ago, CardinalBacker said: I can't speak for AHUDDLESTON, but many Kirbyville residents have openly questioned whether not Dr. Wallis could have pulled the trigger. The more this drags on, the worse it looks for Kirbyville. In most places, firing a principal for boofing his secretary is the only reasonable course of action... regardless of how charismatic the principal is. The good news is that all of the people of Kirbyville will get to share in any buyout of Dr. Wallis's contract should the school board opt to go a different way, and will no doubt pay for any settlement that the grieving family ends up receiving. So, when the citizens of Kirbyville are saying "I'll bring the diesel! You'uns fetch some matches! We'll meet up at the schoolhouse!!!," remember to yell "and we can all pay higher taxes!!!!" It's way too late for the school to replace a super, assistant super, high school principal, assistant high school principal, and junior high principal in less than two months. I doubt they can come up with enough candidates, much less good ones on such short notice. I wonder if there could be a clause in the Supt contract that if he's found doing something unlawful, he could be let go without pay? Sounds reasonable. We'll see. BTW:. I heard they're having a bar-b-q fundraiser for the Reeves family in Kirbyville tomorrow. Ch 6. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2wedge Posted June 10, 2017 Report Share Posted June 10, 2017 Listen to yourselves! Your accusing the man of murder. He may be a jerk but that's a far cry from murderer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AggiesAreWe Posted June 10, 2017 Report Share Posted June 10, 2017 17 hours ago, REBgp said: I wonder if there could be a clause in the Supt contract that if he's found doing something unlawful, he could be let go without pay? Sounds reasonable. We'll see. BTW:. I heard they're having a bar-b-q fundraiser for the Reeves family in Kirbyville tomorrow. Ch 6. No disrespect intended here, but that would be the first I have ever heard of a someone doing a benefit for a family who lost a loved one due to suicide. CardinalBacker 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CardinalBacker Posted June 10, 2017 Report Share Posted June 10, 2017 17 hours ago, REBgp said: I wonder if there could be a clause in the Supt contract that if he's found doing something unlawful, he could be let go without pay? Sounds reasonable. We'll see. BTW:. I heard they're having a bar-b-q fundraiser for the Reeves family in Kirbyville tomorrow. Ch 6. No doubt he can be removed for doing something unlawful, but to this point I haven't seen anything to indicate that he's broken a rule, much less a law. He misled the news by saying the meeting with Reeves was nothing major, then it turns out it was a "resign or get fired" meeting. Dr. Wallis would defend his statement by saying that he was trying to spare the feelings of the family by leaving the bad stuff out when talking to the media. Here's a brainbender... the secretary is alleged to have told admin that Reeves had threatened to hurt himself if news of the affair got out. If that statement is true, then the secretary admitted that the affair occurred or was occurring. So, either the secretary admitted to the affair and expressed concern for Reeves, or Reeves never threatened to harm himself. Either way, Wallis is in the clear. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CardinalBacker Posted June 10, 2017 Report Share Posted June 10, 2017 8 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said: No disrespect intended here, but that would be the first I have ever heard of a someone doing a benefit for a family who lost a loved one due to suicide. For real... I've heard a few people mention that. Most families would be ready to scrap over discussing somebody in the family who ended things that way. Maybe times have changed, I dunno. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hagar Posted June 10, 2017 Report Share Posted June 10, 2017 20 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said: No doubt he can be removed for doing something unlawful, but to this point I haven't seen anything to indicate that he's broken a rule, much less a law. He misled the news by saying the meeting with Reeves was nothing major, then it turns out it was a "resign or get fired" meeting. Dr. Wallis would defend his statement by saying that he was trying to spare the feelings of the family by leaving the bad stuff out when talking to the media. Here's a brainbender... the secretary is alleged to have told admin that Reeves had threatened to hurt himself if news of the affair got out. If that statement is true, then the secretary admitted that the affair occurred or was occurring. So, either the secretary admitted to the affair and expressed concern for Reeves, or Reeves never threatened to harm himself. Either way, Wallis is in the clear. It's my understanding that there's a court order (not sure of correct legal term) against any disposing of documents. If he did throw some away, wouldn't that be illegal? Also, Ch 6 stated that is the thing (one of?) that cost him his previous job at, I believe, College Station. He'd been caught disposing of documents. I don't remember the particulars. Of course, I didn't say he had broke a law, I was merely asking the question, "if he did break a law", perhaps he could be released without having to pay him the money remaining on his contract. Again, i know little about contracts or law. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
runbabyrun Posted June 11, 2017 Report Share Posted June 11, 2017 It was Bryan ISD. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hagar Posted June 11, 2017 Report Share Posted June 11, 2017 3 hours ago, runbabyrun said: It was Bryan ISD. Thanks run, at my age I'm lucky I remembered its in Texas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hagar Posted June 22, 2017 Report Share Posted June 22, 2017 On May 30, 2017 at 10:47 PM, rykerx144 said: Im afraid this is just the start. I heard, but can't confirm, that several other principles have resigned (elementary & ????). Have you heard this? Man, I feel sorry for the folks in Kirbyville. They don't deserve this. And I wonder, what's the underlying cause, and how could it get so bad, so quick. I'm not a resident, but the mayor (who referred to the upset folks as rednecks), his son, and the Supt (and maybe Asst Supt) are up to something, and it smells worse than the paper mill here in Evadale. jv_coach 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hagar Posted June 23, 2017 Report Share Posted June 23, 2017 More from Ch 6 News. None explanatory, mostly hurdles into the investigation. One comment when I watched that's not on here, from the KISD, concerning the restraining order of not disposing of any documents (paraphrased): "As a Govt organization, we should be able to dispose of anything we won't". I thot that was kind of a strange statement. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up jv_coach 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.