WOSgrad Posted June 21, 2017 Report Posted June 21, 2017 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
WOSgrad Posted June 21, 2017 Author Report Posted June 21, 2017 29 minutes ago, EnjoyLife said: I would like to have that problem. Oh, I don't think you'll see Coach Thompson petitioning the UIL to take back their trophies. However, it does cause quite a headache. It is a big enough problem that he has to get 6 non-district games to fill a 10 game schedule. You couple that with a quite lengthy list of schools that decline to play and the headache becomes one that Excedrin can't get rid of. Quote
2wedge Posted June 21, 2017 Report Posted June 21, 2017 WOS should never have to leave the triangle to fill that schedule. Between PNG, Central, Westbrook, Nederland, Lumberton, Vidor, Jasper, and PAM, someone should be willing to play WOS yearly. If I was PNG, this game would always be on my schedule. Why is everyone so afraid of the competition? png9mon, dj, wosfan1992 and 1 other 4 Quote
WOSgrad Posted June 21, 2017 Author Report Posted June 21, 2017 27 minutes ago, 2wedge said: WOS should never have to leave the triangle to fill that schedule. Between PNG, Central, Westbrook, Nederland, Lumberton, Vidor, Jasper, and PAM, someone should be willing to play WOS yearly. If I was PNG, this game would always be on my schedule. Why is everyone so afraid of the competition? Well, to be fair. All of the above teams have fewer non-district games than the Mustangs. If the new alignment somehow creates smaller 5A districts (which it may or may not do) that might create some more opportunities. 2wedge and Alpha Wolf 2 Quote
EaglesFootball Posted June 21, 2017 Report Posted June 21, 2017 I'm pretty sure I heard one of the Newton coaches say that they are playing WOS in 2018 and 2019 seasons which is awesome in my opinion. 2wedge 1 Quote
CCRed Posted June 21, 2017 Report Posted June 21, 2017 Like grad said, the biggest problem is having to play 6 non-district games. Most schools only play 2-3 and at most 4. That leaves them looking for other schools that only have 4 or 5 teams in their district to schedule with. I think all districts should have at least 8 teams, especially if you're going to take 4 to the playoffs. Alpha Wolf, 2wedge and BlackShirts5 3 Quote
jv_coach Posted June 21, 2017 Report Posted June 21, 2017 20 minutes ago, CCRed said: I think all districts should have at least 8 teams, especially if you're going to take 4 to the playoffs. Gotta have 16 districts 2wedge 1 Quote
griff Posted June 21, 2017 Report Posted June 21, 2017 In the last few years, I have made this exact point on this message board about more than a few teams being unwilling (downright DECLINING) to play WO-S, while they had the opportunity to agree to play. Several posters did not believe me, but now we see the information has gone public. Coach T has never been one to toot his own horn or try to get public attention for himself. But since the Bmt Enterprise decided to do this article, now everyone knows what at least a few of us have known for years. This same problem has existed for WO-S since the Dan Hooks years, but the difficulty to schedule teams has never been higher than it is now. dj, Morris_era and 2wedge 3 Quote
Uncle Pig Posted June 22, 2017 Report Posted June 22, 2017 11 hours ago, 2wedge said: WOS should never have to leave the triangle to fill that schedule. Between PNG, Central, Westbrook, Nederland, Lumberton, Vidor, Jasper, and PAM, someone should be willing to play WOS yearly. If I was PNG, this game would always be on my schedule. Why is everyone so afraid of the competition? Would love to see WOS vs. PAM 2wedge 1 Quote
Guest ECBucFan Posted June 22, 2017 Report Posted June 22, 2017 I noticed Thompson stated "Bridge City wound up with with a 21-day gap between a non-district loss to Newton and its district opener against Cleveland." So, how did BC do against Cleveland in the district opener? Why did the writer mention a non district loss if a more important district result is left omitted? BTW, BC 42, Cleveland 3. Quote
purpleeagle Posted June 22, 2017 Report Posted June 22, 2017 Some districts are probably smaller due to trying to cut down on long traveling games. I know they added Frankston to Newton's district. Frankston is the other side of Jacksonville. A lot of our fans cannot travel that far. That's a long drive on the old yellow dog. A major problem if our football bus breaks down and we have to get another bus brought down to make it to the game on time. Last year our cheer leader bus broke down, luckily we were only playing at Silsbee that night. Quote
WOSgrad Posted June 22, 2017 Author Report Posted June 22, 2017 5 hours ago, Uncle Pig said: Would love to see WOS vs. PAM I would, too. But apparently, one of the coaches who would have to agree to this game is one of those on the "list of 30" referenced in the article. 2wedge 1 Quote
Hagar Posted June 22, 2017 Report Posted June 22, 2017 Kudos to KIPP, whoever they are. WOS won't get a lot out of it, but at least they can suit up and get on the field with someone. As a poster alluded to earlier, I bet any team would love to have this kind of problem. Says volumes about the WOS program. Quote
WOSgrad Posted June 22, 2017 Author Report Posted June 22, 2017 3 hours ago, ECBucFan said: I noticed Thompson stated "Bridge City wound up with with a 21-day gap between a non-district loss to Newton and its district opener against Cleveland." So, how did BC do against Cleveland in the district opener? Why did the writer mention a non district loss if a more important district result is left omitted? BTW, BC 42, Cleveland 3. I agree, it adds nothing to the article by referencing a loss before the gap. He even cuts himself off when he has DuBois admitting that it ended up not being a bad thing for them. That being said, I am sure that he is glad that he doesn't have a repeat of that again this year. Quote
png9mon Posted June 22, 2017 Report Posted June 22, 2017 19 hours ago, 2wedge said: WOS should never have to leave the triangle to fill that schedule. Between PNG, Central, Westbrook, Nederland, Lumberton, Vidor, Jasper, and PAM, someone should be willing to play WOS yearly. If I was PNG, this game would always be on my schedule. Why is everyone so afraid of the competition? PNG scrimmages WOS, but I would love to see that game in the pre-season every year. Great teams & atmosphere. Quote
WOSgrad Posted June 22, 2017 Author Report Posted June 22, 2017 18 hours ago, EaglesFootball said: I'm pretty sure I heard one of the Newton coaches say that they are playing WOS in 2018 and 2019 seasons which is awesome in my opinion. That would be great, Newton usually provides a decent test for WO-S. Quote
ctown81 Posted June 22, 2017 Report Posted June 22, 2017 22 hours ago, EnjoyLife said: I would like to have that problem. I don't think it's a problem I'd like to have. From what the posters are saying here is WOS will not be as good as next year, but they still have a shot. If that's the case, this team may need to be battle tested before they get to the playoffs. If not, I give the advantage to Gilmer this year if they meet. Quote
Uncle Pig Posted June 22, 2017 Report Posted June 22, 2017 5 hours ago, WOSgrad said: I would, too. But apparently, one of the coaches who would have to agree to this game is one of those on the "list of 30" referenced in the article. Yessir nothing to gain and everything to lose for PAM; if they beat them, big deal they're supposed to. If WOS beats PAM(which IMO could very easily happen) then it looks real bad for PAM. Alpha Wolf 1 Quote
Bigdog Posted June 22, 2017 Report Posted June 22, 2017 23 hours ago, 2wedge said: WOS should never have to leave the triangle to fill that schedule. Between PNG, Central, Westbrook, Nederland, Lumberton, Vidor, Jasper, and PAM, someone should be willing to play WOS yearly. If I was PNG, this game would always be on my schedule. Why is everyone so afraid of the competition? Nederland played them last year in non-district and will again this year. I know PNG has had them on the schedule as well. As far as 22-5a goes, losing a non-distict game because of the Livingston deal messed everyone up. Quote
Alpha Wolf Posted June 22, 2017 Report Posted June 22, 2017 On 6/21/2017 at 2:58 PM, 2wedge said: WOS should never have to leave the triangle to fill that schedule. Between PNG, Central, Westbrook, Nederland, Lumberton, Vidor, Jasper, and PAM, someone should be willing to play WOS yearly. If I was PNG, this game would always be on my schedule. Why is everyone so afraid of the competition? Well I'm pulling for Nelson and Thompson to put it on the schedule starting in 2018. Central was playing them until Foreman and Thompson had a "conflict of interest"... Quote
Alpha Wolf Posted June 22, 2017 Report Posted June 22, 2017 8 hours ago, WOSgrad said: I would, too. But apparently, one of the coaches who would have to agree to this game is one of those on the "list of 30" referenced in the article. How about you get that list of 30 for us Quote
WOSgrad Posted June 22, 2017 Author Report Posted June 22, 2017 5 minutes ago, Jag Insider said: How about you get that list of 30 for us I wish I could. Quote
Goblin Posted June 23, 2017 Report Posted June 23, 2017 Trivia question: Can anyone name the closest program geographically that actually has a winning record against WO-S all-time? Hint: it's not in Orange, Jefferson, Newton, Jasper, Liberty, Chambers or Hardin Counties. Quote
WOSgrad Posted June 23, 2017 Author Report Posted June 23, 2017 27 minutes ago, Goblin said: Trivia question: Can anyone name the closest program geographically that actually has a winning record against WO-S all-time? Hint: it's not in Orange, Jefferson, Newton, Jasper, Liberty, Chambers or Hardin Counties. Baytown Lee Goblin 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.