Mueller's Empire & Legions of Lawyers

[Hagar]

This is getting out of hand.  He already has 14 top notched lawyers (predominantly democrats) and is getting more.  Even if they were totally unbiased, there are very few organizations, companies, or any group that could come through an investigation of this type unscathed.  Not the Southern Baptist Convention, The Vatican, or the DNC.  Personally, I think the prudent move would be to kill this thing before it gets out of hand.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[Reagan]

I've heard that Mueller's set to make a minimum of 10 MILLION dollars of this fishing expedition! 

[westend1]

American Greatness?  Who reads this crap?   How do you find it?

[Englebert]

32 minutes ago, westend1 said:

American Greatness?  Who reads this crap?   How do you find it?

This coming from someone who posted a link from foreignpolicy.com. Who reads that crap? And how did you find it?

[Hagar]

10 hours ago, westend1 said:

American Greatness?  Who reads this crap?   How do you find it?

What part of it do you not believe?  You, who admitted he was so much smarter than others on this board.  You, the same person that scoffed at the cost of this, comparing it to a Congressional hearing.  I've read, but can't confirm yet, that Mueller himself will make 10 million.  Can't imagine what this high powered team of lawyers will cost us.  To investigate what?  Allegations from unnamed sources, despite the fact the FBI has found nothing.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[westend1]

1 hour ago, REBgp said:

What part of it do you not believe?  You, who admitted he was so much smarter than others on this board.  You, the same person that scoffed at the cost of this, comparing it to a Congressional hearing.  I've read, but can't confirm yet, that Mueller himself will make 10 million.  Can't imagine what this high powered team of lawyers will cost us.  To investigate what?  Allegations from unnamed sources, despite the fact the FBI has found nothing.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Found nothing?   Do you not read anything other than conspiracy sites?   Russia hacked the DNC and multiple voting sites.   There were many undisclosed contacts between the Trump team and Russia.  Was there any connection?   Who knows?    The assistant AG(appointed by Trump) thought it needed to be looked at.       I will agree it's a waste of time, because nothing will ever come of it, just like the Benghazi stuff, but why were you not criticizing that waste of time and money?     It's all politics.   Only this time, it's the Republicans who have decided to investigate their own party.

[Englebert]

8 minutes ago, westend1 said:

Found nothing?   Do you not read anything other than conspiracy sites?   Russia hacked the DNC and multiple voting sites.   There were many undisclosed contacts between the Trump team and Russia.  Was there any connection?   Who knows?    The assistant AG(appointed by Trump) thought it needed to be looked at.       I will agree it's a waste of time, because nothing will ever come of it, just like the Benghazi stuff, but why were you not criticizing that waste of time and money?     It's all politics.   Only this time, it's the Republicans who have decided to investigate their own party.

Why were you not upset when foreign governments hacked into practically every department of our government, and every branch of our military? Why were you not livid about undisclosed contacts between the Hillary team and Russia? Why were you not upset that the Obama administration meddled in the Israeli elections? This is a whole bunch of fake outrage based on nothing but unnamed sources. So yeah, they have found absolutely nothing. It's funny and quizzical that with all of the leaks coming out the government, not one leak showing any evidence of "collusion" between the Trump team and Russia. But I guess y'all have to hold on to some hope no matter how stupid it makes y'all look.

[westend1]

8 minutes ago, Englebert said:

Why were you not upset when foreign governments hacked into practically every department of our government, and every branch of our military? Why were you not livid about undisclosed contacts between the Hillary team and Russia? Why were you not upset that the Obama administration meddled in the Israeli elections? This is a whole bunch of fake outrage based on nothing but unnamed sources. So yeah, they have found absolutely nothing. It's funny and quizzical that with all of the leaks coming out the government, not one leak showing any evidence of "collusion" between the Trump team and Russia. But I guess y'all have to hold on to some hope no matter how stupid it makes y'all look.

I have no outrage, fake or otherwise.     We will see where the investigation leads.   

[Hagar]

18 minutes ago, westend1 said:

Found nothing?   Do you not read anything other than conspiracy sites?   Russia hacked the DNC and multiple voting sites.   There were many undisclosed contacts between the Trump team and Russia.  Was there any connection?   Who knows?    The assistant AG(appointed by Trump) thought it needed to be looked at.       I will agree it's a waste of time, because nothing will ever come of it, just like the Benghazi stuff, but why were you not criticizing that waste of time and money?     It's all politics.   Only this time, it's the Republicans who have decided to investigate their own party.

Bengazi stuff?  You say that like it's just some ho-hum back room politics.  Dont you realize 4 Americans were killed and 2 severely injured?  Do you admit that Obama and Hillary lied to the families of those killed,many to the American people.  And not for some "top secret" reason, but merely to cover their glaring mistakes.  Bengazi stuff?  You and folks like you are heartless and have compassion for no one but yourself. 

Am I upset that supposedly Russians hacked into our voting rolls (not voting sites).  Yes, but I'm also upset when any hacker gets in a site & steals information.  I got upset when my credit card company called me to see if I was in Germany trying to buy items.  Hackers gonna hack.  Our info, be it voting rolls, or credit cards, should be protected with enough security systems to prevent most of that.  And lastly, even Comey admitted there's no evidence against Trump or his people of collusion.  That fits the definition of a "witch hunt".

[Englebert]

4 minutes ago, westend1 said:

I have no outrage, fake or otherwise.     We will see where the investigation leads.   

Why do we need an investigation? You and the Liberals have nothing, nada, not one shred of evidence, but you are in favor of spending millions, possibly billions on a witch hunt. I would be in favor of an investigation if we had something more than just some unnamed sources with secret allegations. And it's absolutely pathetic that we have to spend money on this when we couldn't even get a special prosecutor for Hillary and her email/Benghazi scandals, which had all kinds of real evidence.

[westend1]

4 minutes ago, Englebert said:

Why do we need an investigation? You and the Liberals have nothing, nada, not one shred of evidence, but you are in favor of spending millions, possibly billions on a witch hunt. I would be in favor of an investigation if we had something more than just some unnamed sources with secret allegations. And it's absolutely pathetic that we have to spend money on this when we couldn't even get a special prosecutor for Hillary and her email/Benghazi scandals, which had all kinds of real evidence.

Billions?   I don't think the FBI is an unnamed source.  They are the ones who say Russia tried to influence the elections.  They are the ones who say Russia hacked the servers.     And remember, this "witch hunt"  is being directed by Republicans   They can shut it down any time they want.

[Englebert]

7 minutes ago, westend1 said:

Billions?   I don't think the FBI is an unnamed source.  They are the ones who say Russia tried to influence the elections.  They are the ones who say Russia hacked the servers.     And remember, this "witch hunt"  is being directed by Republicans   They can shut it down any time they want.

And the FBI has offered zero evidence and said that not one vote was changed due to Russian "interference". So the only investigation that needs to be done is to investigate the FBI. The first question I would have is define exactly what was done to be labeled as "interference", and show how all-of-a-sudden this is any different than what they have done in all of the presidential elections in the past 80 years. It's an easy question to answer...fake outrage.

And this investigation is being conducted only to appease the sheeple that are being led by the Liberal/Socialist party (formerly known as the Democrat party). Shutting it down would in all likelihood, no definitely, spur ridiculous conspiracy theories from every mainstream media outlet, not to mention the crap that would emanate from far Left propaganda sites. The sheeple will predictable fall for it and we very well could see rioting in many major cities across the U.S.

[westend1]

13 minutes ago, Englebert said:

And the FBI has offered zero evidence and said that not one vote was changed due to Russian "interference". So the only investigation that needs to be done is to investigate the FBI. The first question I would have is define exactly what was done to be labeled as "interference", and show how all-of-a-sudden this is any different than what they have done in all of the presidential elections in the past 80 years. It's an easy question to answer...fake outrage.

And this investigation is being conducted only to appease the sheeple that are being led by the Liberal/Socialist party (formerly known as the Democrat party). Shutting it down would in all likelihood, no definitely, spur ridiculous conspiracy theories from every mainstream media outlet, not to mention the crap that would emanate from far Left propaganda sites. The sheeple will predictable fall for it and we very well could see rioting in many major cities across the U.S.

Nobody knows how the interference affected voters.   Certainly not you.   You sure seem scared of an investigation though.

[BS Wildcats]

8 minutes ago, westend1 said:

Nobody knows how the interference affected voters.   Certainly not you.   You sure seem scared of an investigation though.

The left is scared that nothing will be found, and they will have to find another excuse for Hillary's defeat.  Maybe, it was because she was more crooked, as you and other leftist believe he is, than Trump.  Why not the same "outrage" from your own party with what was done to Bernie by Hillary and the DNC?

[Englebert]

4 minutes ago, westend1 said:

Nobody knows how the interference affected voters.   Certainly not you.   You sure seem scared of an investigation though.

So in a previous post when I stated that "I would be in favor of an investigation if we had any shred of evidence" you interpreted that as me being scared of an investigation? Really? That deserves one of your obligatory LOLs.

And yes I do know how the "interference" affected voters. It didn't. You can't even state what the interference was. Please let your imagination run wild and see if you can dream up some scenarios of how the Russians could have possibly influenced voters. The only theory I've heard so far, and from unnamed sources of course, is that Russia disseminated fake news. And of course no examples were given. But if true, how is this any different than what both sides did, although far more fake news oozed from the Left.

[westend1]

5 minutes ago, Englebert said:

So in a previous post when I stated that "I would be in favor of an investigation if we had any shred of evidence" you interpreted that as me being scared of an investigation? Really? That deserves one of your obligatory LOLs.

And yes I do know how the "interference" affected voters. It didn't. You can't even state what the interference was. Please let your imagination run wild and see if you can dream up some scenarios of how the Russians could have possibly influenced voters. The only theory I've heard so far, and from unnamed sources of course, is that Russia disseminated fake news. And of course no examples were given. But if true, how is this any different than what both sides did, although far more fake news oozed from the Left.

Russia hacked emails and gave them to wikileaks.   At least that is what has been reported.  Did that not happen?

[Englebert]

3 minutes ago, westend1 said:

Russia hacked emails and gave them to wikileaks.   At least that is what has been reported.  Did that not happen?

Russia is being blamed for hacking the DNC, but real evidence has shown that Podesta was the victim of a phishing scheme which could have been pulled off by a kid in high school. But the real story behind this theory is that the emails published on WikiLeaks were 100% authentic, unedited emails. Do you have a problem with people learning factual information? I would not be upset in the least if factual emails from Trump were released. Do you feel the Podesta emails should have been deemed "classified"? (If so, then we could have just gotten them off of Hillary's server.)

[stevenash]

28 minutes ago, westend1 said:

Nobody knows how the interference affected voters.   Certainly not you.   You sure seem scared of an investigation though.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[westend1]

8 minutes ago, Englebert said:

Russia is being blamed for hacking the DNC, but real evidence has shown that Podesta was the victim of a phishing scheme which could have been pulled off by a kid in high school. But the real story behind this theory is that the emails published on WikiLeaks were 100% authentic, unedited emails. Do you have a problem with people learning factual information? I would not be upset in the least if factual emails from Trump were released. Do you feel the Podesta emails should have been deemed "classified"? (If so, then we could have just gotten them off of Hillary's server.)

No.  It has been determined that it was Russia.   That is fact.

[westend1]

4 minutes ago, stevenash said:

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

This.   Nobody knows how voters were affected  Thanks Nash

[stevenash]

Translation- The voters found out things about Mrs. Clinton and the Democrats that they otherwise might not have found out and thereby changed their vote.  If full disclosure is always the goal, how the disclosure was obtained becomes less important.   Sort of like the short taping of Romney regarding the 49%?

[Englebert]

3 minutes ago, westend1 said:

No.  It has been determined that it was Russia.   That is fact.

No, it is not. The FBI said it was fact, be recent events have shown the heads of the FBI to be political hacks and not to be trusted. These so-called "facts" might be just that, but I have no reason to believe the FBI on political issues, especially when they refused to show any evidence as to why the reached their conclusion. But let's say it is a fact that Russia hacked the DNC, the released emails were 100% authentic, unedited emails. So the American voter was treated to factual information. Do you have a problem with that?

[Englebert]

8 minutes ago, westend1 said:

This.   Nobody knows how voters were affected  Thanks Nash

And these are the same people that insist Man-Made Global Warming is caused by Man and is destroying our planet. These same people claim this is FACT. Comey has already admitted to leaking information about Trump, so it is just as likely that he himself hacked the DNC and leaked the emails.

[westend1]

5 minutes ago, Englebert said:

No, it is not. The FBI said it was fact, be recent events have shown the heads of the FBI to be political hacks and not to be trusted. These so-called "facts" might be just that, but I have no reason to believe the FBI on political issues, especially when they refused to show any evidence as to why the reached their conclusion. But let's say it is a fact that Russia hacked the DNC, the released emails were 100% authentic, unedited emails. So the American voter was treated to factual information. Do you have a problem with that?

Do I have a problem with Russia hacking servers in an attempt to influence elections?  Is that what you are asking?   smh

[Englebert]

10 minutes ago, westend1 said:

Do I have a problem with Russia hacking servers in an attempt to influence elections?  Is that what you are asking?   smh

No, I'm asking if you have a problem with Podesta's emails being published on WikiLeaks, the emails that have been proven as 100% authentic and unedited.

I'll also ask you if you have a problem with Russia hacking our servers. If so, why weren't you as upset when they hacked into every government department, including each branch of our military? And if the Russians hacked servers, this was done under the Obama watch. So if you are upset about the hacks, shouldn't you be upset at Obama? Why is Russian hacks of the DNC causing all kinds of outrage when the same hacks of our military barely received a peep from the Liberal media?