whsalum Posted March 13, 2007 Report Share Posted March 13, 2007 972,Thanks for that post.That's exactly what I was thinking.You just said it in a way that didn't offend anyone.I don't agree with getting the kids ready for college probably 1 in 500 will actually get the chance to play at the next level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Buddy Garrity Posted March 14, 2007 Author Report Share Posted March 14, 2007 the spread is cool, but its kinda like saying to the other team "were scared so were gonna hold the ball when we get a lead". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmtdc1996 Posted March 14, 2007 Report Share Posted March 14, 2007 NO SHOT CLOCK! A shot clock will NOT get a kid ready to play at the college level, playing basketball will. Playing any and all types of games whether it be fast break, run and holler, shoot and foller or slow down, take twenty passes until you get a good look. A kid should learn all aspects of the game and leaving the game like it is lets coaches be creative. A win is a win whether it is 90-89 or 20-19. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
king Posted March 14, 2007 Report Share Posted March 14, 2007 I think they should use a shot clock in high school the game would be more excitingand holding on to the ball for a long time What a cheap way to win : Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warfan Posted March 14, 2007 Report Share Posted March 14, 2007 No shot clock, there should be much more to basketball than "runnin and dunkin". We keep doing things to take the finesse out of the game. The only rule change I would make is to allow only 10 seconds in the back court. Run it like the shot clock. If a team calls time out with 8 seconds left, they would only have 2 left to get across the line. As it stands now good defense is not rewarded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shooter Posted March 14, 2007 Report Share Posted March 14, 2007 I believe the shot clock will do little to improve the quality of play because most teams shoot the ball before 35 seconds expire. I ofen wonder why most kids rush things on offense, particualarly, when the speed game might favor their opponent. In a push supporting the shot clock, it would benefit those players like Ryan Donuhoe, who are getting ready for the next level, and isn't that what this is about, getting kids ready academically and athletically for the next level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUEDOVE3 Posted March 14, 2007 Report Share Posted March 14, 2007 I see the pros & cons on this issue. Personally I favor a shot clock because I like to see a lot action in basketball, and not see teams use the strategy of 10 passes, then shoot. But on the other hand, I've seen some mighty teams fall because of an oppenent's game tactic of 10 passes and a cloud of dust. It's beautiful when it is put to perfection, but very frustrating when you are playing against it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rub-a-dub Posted March 14, 2007 Report Share Posted March 14, 2007 I think there should be one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest tigersvoice Posted March 14, 2007 Report Share Posted March 14, 2007 I like the idea of a shot clock in high school. As someone said earlier, it would help prepare players that are going to the next level. I know the great majority of high school round ballers DO NOT go on to play in college or beyond but that should not be the reason that a shot clock is not tried. And, of course, I like an up-beat pace in the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ~WHfutureplayers~ Posted March 15, 2007 Report Share Posted March 15, 2007 YES......PLEASE!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts