king Posted July 20, 2017 Report Posted July 20, 2017 He will be up for parole today. Who thinks he will be set free?? Quote
png9mon Posted July 20, 2017 Report Posted July 20, 2017 He is better off in jail. He can't profit from book, or movie deals. Who is going to hire him? He has a room, food, tv. Stay OJ Stay!!!! No need to bother to "Go" Quote
baddog Posted July 20, 2017 Report Posted July 20, 2017 If he gets out, it's not like his trouble days are over. I really couldn't care less for the murderer. Quote
king Posted July 20, 2017 Author Report Posted July 20, 2017 1 hour ago, png9mon said: He is better off in jail. He can't profit from book, or movie deals. Who is going to hire him? He has a room, food, tv. Stay OJ Stay!!!! No need to bother to "Go" I think he gets like 25 grand a month from NFL They're really milking this hearing Quote
baddog Posted July 20, 2017 Report Posted July 20, 2017 40 minutes ago, king said: I think he gets like 25 grand a month from NFL They're really milking this hearing Just like they milked his murder arrest. How many of us would have been escorted in that way? They would have pulled us over with guns drawn. The whole thing was a circus. Quote
baddog Posted July 20, 2017 Report Posted July 20, 2017 Simpson is granted parole. The circus is back in town. Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted July 20, 2017 Report Posted July 20, 2017 2 hours ago, baddog said: Simpson is granted parole. The circus is back in town. No doubt...now we gotta watch the media follow this murdering fool around for months. Quote
PAMFAM10 Posted July 21, 2017 Report Posted July 21, 2017 Reality series coming soon.. png9mon and Hagar 2 Quote
new tobie Posted July 22, 2017 Report Posted July 22, 2017 18 hours ago, PAMFAM10 said: Reality series coming soon.. OJ needs to take his 25,000 per month and keep his mouth shut.The court system granted him the same innocence that it has granted all of these cops that got away with murder. Quote
Englebert Posted July 22, 2017 Report Posted July 22, 2017 1 hour ago, new tobie said: OJ needs to take his 25,000 per month and keep his mouth shut.The court system granted him the same innocence that it has granted all of these cops that got away with murder. Name one of these cops that got away with murder. Please enlighten us with your clairvoyant facts. Better yet, why don't you start a new thread on this and we can discuss it. I know you won't because you don't want to hear the truth, but I figured I would ask anyway. I have a strong feeling that was a wasted 10 seconds of my life. Quote
new tobie Posted July 22, 2017 Report Posted July 22, 2017 11 hours ago, Englebert said: Name one of these cops that got away with murder. Please enlighten us with your clairvoyant facts. Better yet, why don't you start a new thread on this and we can discuss it. I know you won't because you don't want to hear the truth, but I figured I would ask anyway. I have a strong feeling that was a wasted 10 seconds of my life. The court system said that oj was innocent, just like it has for the cops. For the cops you side with the judicial system though. Quote
new tobie Posted July 22, 2017 Report Posted July 22, 2017 On 7/20/2017 at 3:59 PM, LumRaiderFan said: No doubt...now we gotta watch the media follow this murdering fool around for months. When the courts said that Zimmerman was innocent, we needed to listen to the courts, but with oj we shouldn't. Quote
baddog Posted July 22, 2017 Report Posted July 22, 2017 1 hour ago, new tobie said: When the courts said that Zimmerman was innocent, we needed to listen to the courts, but with oj we shouldn't. Not the same at all. In the O.J. Case, all the evidence was thrown out in the criminal trial so there was not enough facts to convict. In the civil trial, however, the same evidence was admitted and he was convicted of murder. Anyone who sides with O.J. is a POS! Quote
Englebert Posted July 22, 2017 Report Posted July 22, 2017 3 hours ago, new tobie said: The court system said that oj was innocent, just like it has for the cops. For the cops you side with the judicial system though. Just as I thought, you can't name a single cop that got away with murder. Who would have guessed you just run your mouth then run like a little schoolgirl when challenged to back up your lies. You must be so proud. If you want to know why racism exists in the country, you need look no further than in the mirror. Quote
jv_coach Posted July 24, 2017 Report Posted July 24, 2017 I could care less. The justice system set him free, so he is free. Quote
Kountzer Posted July 24, 2017 Report Posted July 24, 2017 I've always said that OJ did it. He was the only one that had a motive. He got off on legal technicalities. Two wrongs don't make a right. I've seen white privilege in the court system all my life. So the OJ verdict in '94 '95 didn't bother me all that much. Besides, heaven is going to get all these injustices corrected. Nobody gets away with anything. jv_coach 1 Quote
tvc184 Posted July 30, 2017 Report Posted July 30, 2017 On 7/22/2017 at 8:51 AM, new tobie said: When the courts said that Zimmerman was innocent, we needed to listen to the courts, but with oj we shouldn't. Yes we should listen as that is the law. They are not quite the same though and not just being different facts. OJ was a popular and rich celebrity. Zimmerman, not so much. The one juror that spoke after the Zimmerman verdict said that the jury "wanted to" convict him of murder but the evidence simply was not there. I think the jury in the Simpson trial had the exact opposite take and it was a case of jury nullification. If they "wanted to" convict him, they would have. Both certainly reach the same legal standing and they are both not guilty. There is a huge difference in the way the cases were handled and the popularity of the suspects however. Quote
baddog Posted July 30, 2017 Report Posted July 30, 2017 29 minutes ago, tvc184 said: Yes we should listen as that is the law. They are not quite the same though and not just being different facts. OJ was a popular and rich celebrity. Zimmerman, not so much. The one juror that spoke after the Zimmerman verdict said that the jury "wanted to" convict him of murder but the evidence simply was not there. I think the jury in the Simpson trial had the exact opposite take and it was a case of jury nullification. If they "wanted to" convict him, they would have. Both certainly reach the same legal standing and they are both not guilty. There is a huge difference in the way the cases were handled and the popularity of the suspects however. Agree with what you stated. In short, O.J. was found not guilty because Mark Furman used the "N" word 10 years prior. Johnny Cochran turned it into a racially motivated trial. It was never about the evidence or he wouldn't have been convicted of murder in civil court. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.