TxHoops Posted August 27, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 27, 2017 1 hour ago, stevenash said: Ok, now I understand. Not having the wall built by inauguration week is intolerable? No apparently you don't. I'm saying that only being six months late running a story that was debunked in February could be considered progress... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted August 27, 2017 Report Share Posted August 27, 2017 4 hours ago, TxHoops said: No apparently you don't. I'm saying that only being six months late running a story that was debunked in February could be considered progress... Guilty as accused TxHoops 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted August 31, 2017 Report Share Posted August 31, 2017 On 8/27/2017 at 11:45 AM, TxHoops said: No apparently you don't. I'm saying that only being six months late running a story that was debunked in February could be considered progress... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hagar Posted September 1, 2017 Report Share Posted September 1, 2017 On August 26, 2017 at 8:11 PM, TxHoops said: That's exactly what I'm saying. That "rag" is merely recycling more fake news to keep the kool aid drinkers from getting thirsty. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up On the upside, I suppose only being 6 months late could be considered progress from this group Look Hoops, I'll admit I'm old and set in my ways, but not so much that new evidence can't change my mind. That said, I've had a recent epiphany that there may be some truth to what your saying. My electricity went off at 8:30 last night and is still off. So until I get electricity back, as The Monkees said, I'm a believer. TxHoops 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hagar Posted September 20, 2017 Report Share Posted September 20, 2017 From the London Times. Almost sure it's not a conservative rag. Guess what? Them MMGW folks done messed up again. Just when I was going to start protesting global warming. Oh well.......... This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Reagan 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Englebert Posted September 20, 2017 Report Share Posted September 20, 2017 1 hour ago, REBgp said: From the London Times. Almost sure it's not a conservative rag. Guess what? Them MMGW folks done messed up again. Just when I was going to start protesting global warming. Oh well.......... This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This exact article could have been written in the late 1990s...and many were, but were ignored...just like this one will be. All of the models have been wrong, and wrong on the warm side. Any sane person would have to question why the models are always wrong, and are always wrong on one side. Could it be due to the fact that if a crisis exists or is imminent, the money for research/remediation flows like wine, and if a catastrophic issue is not a hand, the money becomes scarce? I don't have the time to give this issue the proper response just yet, but I will definitely revisit this issue at a later date. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hagar Posted September 20, 2017 Report Share Posted September 20, 2017 3 hours ago, Englebert said: This exact article could have been written in the late 1990s...and many were, but were ignored...just like this one will be. All of the models have been wrong, and wrong on the warm side. Any sane person would have to question why the models are always wrong, and are always wrong on one side. Could it be due to the fact that if a crisis exists or is imminent, the money for research/remediation flows like wine, and if a catastrophic issue is not a hand, the money becomes scarce? I don't have the time to give this issue the proper response just yet, but I will definitely revisit this issue at a later date. Yes, it is breaking the odds always being wrong on the hot side. And yet the majority of the scientist got bought into it.....oops, I meant buy into it. Freudian slip? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhatMack19 Posted September 20, 2017 Report Share Posted September 20, 2017 Global warming? Artic ice is up 40% in the last 5 years This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Reagan 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted September 20, 2017 Report Share Posted September 20, 2017 No doubt the Mexican earthquake was caused by Global Warming Reagan 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted November 19, 2017 Report Share Posted November 19, 2017 Cost BILLIONS for PALTRY results! This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LumRaiderFan Posted November 27, 2017 Report Share Posted November 27, 2017 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Wonder how the believers will stop this global warming...I think they should all charge up with a giant cork. baddog 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kountzer Posted November 29, 2017 Report Share Posted November 29, 2017 Stopping global warming is not the goal. The goal is a one world system of government, a new world order. The global warming issue is just the vehicle to get that done. baddog and 77 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.