Jump to content

The NFL


Reagan

Recommended Posts

Private business?  On the surface it appears to be.  But, is it really?  From the article:  "The NFL is a "private enterprise" whose "rights" are being violated by those who dare to challenge the league's political radicalization. The anti-Trump Democratic Coalition has even filed an ethics complaint alleging that the president's comments constitute a criminal violation against using government offices "to influence the employment decisions and practices" of a private entity.

Funny. These fair-weather friends of corporate free speech and the First Amendment were nowhere to be found when Boston Mayor Tom Menino and Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel were vowing to shut down Chick-fil-A in their towns as government retaliation against the founders' private religious beliefs.

As for the NFL's status as a "private" enterprise? That's some Super Bowl-sized audacity right there. I first started tracking publicly subsidized sports boondoggles with my very first watchdog website, Porkwatch, back in 1999. Since then, taxpayers at all levels of government have footed the bill for football stadiums to the tune of an estimated $1 billion every year.

Over the past decade, new tax-supported NFL stadiums rose up for the Indianapolis Colts (the $720 million Lucas Oil Stadium), the Dallas Cowboys (the $1.15 billion AT&T Stadium) the New York Jets and Giants (the $1.6 billion MetLife Stadium), the Minnesota Vikings (the $1.1 billion U.S. Bank Stadium), the Atlanta Falcons (the $1.5 billion Mercedes-Benz Stadium), and the San Francisco 49ers (the $1.3 billion Levi's Stadium in Santa Clara).

Next in the works: a whopping $2.6 billion stadium for the Los Angeles Chargers and Rams and a $1.9 billion stadium for the Oakland Raiders when they move to Las Vegas. Left behind? An $83 million taxpayer debt on two-decade-old renovations to the Alameda County Coliseum that the Raiders are abandoning."

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is my understanding that the NFL has a "personal conduct" policy.  If so, these American-hating players are violating this policy.  Even more troublesome, is that the NFL is letting them!

It's interesting, and I'll say again, that after 9-11 the NY Giants and NY Jets wanted to honor either the fallen or the first responders, I don't remember which, but the NFL said NO!   After cops were killed in Dallas, the Cowboys wanted to honor them.  The NFL said NO!  So, my question is:  WHY IS THE NFL ALLOWING AMERICA-HATING ANTICS??!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the hidden content, please

From the article:

Here's what the game operations manual says regarding the national anthem, according to an NFL spokesperson:

The National 

This is the hidden content, please
 must be played prior to every NFL game, and all players must be on the sideline for the National Anthem.

During the National Anthem, players on the field and bench area should stand at attention, face the flag, hold helmets in their left hand, and refrain from talking. The home team should ensure that the American flag is in good condition. It should be pointed out to players and coaches that we continue to be judged by the public in this area of respect for the flag and our country. Failure to be on the field by the start of the National Anthem may result in discipline, such as fines, suspensions, and/or the forfeiture of draft choice(s) for violations of the above, including first offenses.

It's important to note the use of the word "may" here. The NFL is not considering punishing fines on players or teams who choose to kneel or stay in the locker room during the national anthem, the spokesperson says.

Blah Blah Blah...don't mean nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

Saw where Johnny will not be able to play in CFL till next season.

Yeah he applied for his option and the CFL shot him down because of a court case he has pending over tearing up his rental mansion in California.  

 

It’s crazy some countries actually have laws as to who can work within their borders.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The lefties are very sure that they are right on this issue.  Reminds me of about a year ago when they were "sure" on the general election as well.  I stated a long time ago  that if you carry this progressive social agenda too far too quickly, it will bite you in the a$$ and it appears to me that another "bite" will be taken out of that condescending, dismissive, arrogant collective a$$.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Reagan said:

It is my understanding that the NFL has a "personal conduct" policy.  If so, these American-hating players are violating this policy.  Even more troublesome, is that the NFL is letting them!

It's interesting, and I'll say again, that after 9-11 the NY Giants and NY Jets wanted to honor either the fallen or the first responders, I don't remember which, but the NFL said NO!   After cops were killed in Dallas, the Cowboys wanted to honor them.  The NFL said NO!  So, my question is:  WHY IS THE NFL ALLOWING AMERICA-HATING ANTICS??!!

Big girl doesn't believe this happened.  She only hears and sees what fits her racist tendencies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined



  • Posts

    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an easy and obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
    • @CIS_org National Security Senior Fellow @BensmanTodd tells Steve Bannon how the U.S. State Department and USAID have been sending American taxpayer funds to religious nonprofits to facilitate mass immigration to our southern border. Bensman says 248 nonprofits are participating in the United Nations’ 2024 agenda to distribute $1.6 billion in cash, transportation, food, and shelter to U.S.-bound immigrants across Mexico and Latin America.
    • 👍 Oh. I was thinking most thought Wrong Place Wrong Time. Lol. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...