Jump to content

Vidor @ Lumberton


Recommended Posts

if vidor plays like they did the past 3 weeks then i see us walking away with it. I mean think of it this way. Ned held pam to 13 points but gave us 21. And Lumberton defense let Pam score 31 on them. So I see our offense rolling and defense getting enough stops to win. As long as the refs don't interfere then we should be fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Vpirate02 said:

if vidor plays like they did the past 3 weeks then i see us walking away with it. I mean think of it this way. Ned held pam to 13 points but gave us 21. And Lumberton defense let Pam score 31 on them. So I see our offense rolling and defense getting enough stops to win. As long as the refs don't interfere then we should be fine.

Then there's the other side of it. Nederland scored 28 on Vidor but only 7 on PAM, and lumberton scored 19 on PAM. I think Vidor wins it though. Probably 42-21

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Vpirate02 said:

if vidor plays like they did the past 3 weeks then i see us walking away with it. I mean think of it this way. Ned held pam to 13 points but gave us 21. And Lumberton defense let Pam score 31 on them. So I see our offense rolling and defense getting enough stops to win. As long as the refs don't interfere then we should be fine.

Should be a good game!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, L-Train11 said:

Can’t afford to lose any more

Well the Raiders played a good ballgame today.  And Ltown plays D against the Slot T about as well as anyone.  And I'll echo Vpirate02, Vidor has played Ltown several times when I thought Vidor should win, and they end up losing.

Game should be close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we’re obviously much more evenly matched against a team like Vidor. I think we will score a lot and hopefully make some stops and grab the W.

I Said this at the beginning of the year and got laughed at, but the 3rd place spot is not out of our reach. And if we win out which is definitely possible then we will grab that spot. We competed with a tough  Pam team tonight, I think our players should hold their heads high and be ready for this battle!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, pakronos said:

I got Vidor... not to crap on lumberton, but if those snaps on the blocked punts wasn't rolling on the ground, you score once. Penalties kept lumberton drives going.

I know what you’re saying, but over 200 yards of offense on a defense like y’all is pretty impressive. Y’all should be the best defense we face this year. I know there aren’t any moral victories in football, but I will say I’m proud of the direction our program is going. We need to improve, young on defense which hurts us, but we’re getting there. I know for a team like y’all and PNG that doesn’t make sense because y’all are used to winning, but for Lumberton we gotta have something to keep hope alive while we build upon what we got going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, L-Train11 said:

I know what you’re saying, but over 200 yards of offense on a defense like y’all is pretty impressive. Y’all should be the best defense we face this year. I know there aren’t any moral victories in football, but I will say I’m proud of the direction our program is going. We need to improve, young on defense which hurts us, but we’re getting there. I know for a team like y’all and PNG that doesn’t make sense because y’all are used to winning, but for Lumberton we gotta have something to keep hope alive while we build upon what we got going.

Man I can't wait till next friday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined



  • Posts

    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...