Jump to content

Vidor @ Lumberton


Recommended Posts

On 10/9/2017 at 6:06 AM, TenaciousK said:

Vidor will need to work on that QB/Center exchange as well. Too many fumbled snaps in that Ned game. For a system like the slot T, each play is precious to get the next first down.

I agree. That offense can't get behind the sticks, its not designed for that.   2nd and long or 3rd and long isn't good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bigdog said:

I agree. That offense can't get behind the sticks, its not designed for that.   2nd and long or 3rd and long isn't good. 

true..but I will tell you...in all of years as a player, and spectator..I've never seen a game that had zero drives. 7 total touchdowns between vidor and ned, and they were all off the homerun ball. but..wrong post. just throwing that out there lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TenaciousK said:

true..but I will tell you...in all of years as a player, and spectator..I've never seen a game that had zero drives. 7 total touchdowns between vidor and ned, and they were all off the homerun ball. but..wrong post. just throwing that out there lol

So are you meaning that there were no sustained drives, just a few big plays that resulted in scores?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, L-Train11 said:

So are you meaning that there were no sustained drives, just a few big plays that resulted in scores?

The closest either got was Vidor at the 8 going in. Fumbled snap on 3rd down resulted in a missed FG from the 12 on 4th. Other than that...I think 33 yards was shortest touchdown. I THINK.... don't hold me to it... it was a pretty hot day lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TenaciousK said:

The closest either got was Vidor at the 8 going in. Fumbled snap on 3rd down resulted in a missed FG from the 12 on 4th. Other than that...I think 33 yards was shortest touchdown. I THINK.... don't hold me to it... it was a pretty hot day lol

The drives were stopped due to penalties. They had at least 1 penalty on every drive but the one they scored on the second play of the drive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, vp93 said:

The drives were stopped due to penalties. They had at least 1 penalty on every drive but the one they scored on the second play of the drive.

oh i know..but that's part of the game.. .the slot T worked great the 1st quarter...then...it kinda fizzled. and I wish it didn't, cause I love the slot T ..it's an exciting formation when executed. a 3 headed monster of confusion and misdirection. but I was growing curious how many sweeps we were going to run for little to no gains for the remaining 3 quarters. I will say I think the pirates were driving better before they continuously had the flags.. I was really impressed with the Pirate D ...save for the 1 on 1 coverage..but the run D was great. That Joey kid was all over the place. Anyway..this is my last post about the Nederland game on this thread :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TenaciousK said:

The closest either got was Vidor at the 8 going in. Fumbled snap on 3rd down resulted in a missed FG from the 12 on 4th. Other than that...I think 33 yards was shortest touchdown. I THINK.... don't hold me to it... it was a pretty hot day lol

Yeah I know which play your talking about on the fumbled snap, watched it on film today.

so Nederland wasn’t really moving the ball either besides big plays?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, L-Train11 said:

Yeah I know which play your talking about on the fumbled snap, watched it on film today.

so Nederland wasn’t really moving the ball either besides big plays?

I don't feel comfy talking to you about Vidor's capabilities until after this week is over. LOL

Edited by TenaciousK
typo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, TenaciousK said:

I don't feel comfy talking to you about Vidor's capabilities until after this week is over. LOL

I'm glad you didn't tell him about Vidor switching to the shotgun for this game.  I think Coach Matthews hopes to surprise the Raiders with it. :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, chorizo said:

Better hope Raider24 doesn't bribe his son again this week,if he does it's gonna be a long night for that pirate defense....lol

Sometimes you can't just rely on intrinsic motivation! External motivation is an aid! Plus, I was gonna do it anyway, might as well have fun with it! If anyone understands that, I know you do! Where can I get a good tint job done at a reasonable price?? lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Raider24 said:

Sometimes you can't just rely on intrinsic motivation! External motivation is an aid! Plus, I was gonna do it anyway, might as well have fun with it! If anyone understands that, I know you do! Where can I get a good tint job done at a reasonable price?? lol

Gulfway in PA,,I was there Monday..motivation goes a long way..lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined



  • Posts

    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...