Jump to content

The 22-5a what if scenarios


pakronos

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, REBgp said:

No argument from me.  Heaven knows Central has the the team to do it.  And as you and I both said, this Friday will go a long way to finishing the puzzle.  One of those rare instances when all six potential playoff teams are playing each other.  Going to be an exciting Friday!

 

Yep, a weekend of meaningful games...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jag Insider said:

I know the games still have to be played but if we all can agree, our 3 bottom teams are Livingston, Baytown Lee and Beaumont Ozen.  So looking at the schedules, any of the other 6 teams that still have to play one of those 3, I adjusted their district records to show wins over them and I put the other remaining opponents out to the side.

Done alphabetically...

Beaumont Central...3-2...Nederland, Lumberton and Port Neches-Groves

Lumberton...3-2...Vidor, Beaumont Central and Nederland

Nederland...4-1...Beaumont Central, Lumberton and Port Neches-Groves

Port Arthur Memorial...6-0...Port Neches-Groves and Vidor

Port Neches-Groves...4-0...Port Arthur Memorial, Vidor, Beaumont Central and Nederland

Vidor...4-1...Lumberton, Port Neches-Groves and Port Arthur Memorial

 

Normally 5-3 would get you in but we could have a log jam at 5-3 so the for sure magic number is 6 .  In my opinion, PN-G has the toughest schedule remaining but I still see them getting in.  PA-M has the easiest, and regardless of what happens in the PN-G and Vidor games, just need wins in the Livingston and Lee games for them to lock up a playoff spot. 

We will know a little bit more after this Friday...

That was my point as far as having one more week of games to flesh out the scenarios, this week will straighten some of that out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, bigdog said:

That was my point as far as having one more week of games to flesh out the scenarios, this week will straighten some of that out.

Honestly the way I see it is the spots will be determined this week. I'm sorry central but I don't think y'all have it this year. I got pam, ned, and png on top and the 4th spot being decided by the vidor lumberton game this week. But that's just me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Vpirate02 said:

Honestly the way I see it is the spots will be determined this week. I'm sorry central but I don't think y'all have it this year. I got pam, ned, and png on top and the 4th spot being decided by the vidor lumberton game this week. But that's just me.

Nah your on the right trail. 4th spot goes to Vidor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Vpirate02 said:

Honestly the way I see it is the spots will be determined this week. I'm sorry central but I don't think y'all have it this year. I got pam, ned, and png on top and the 4th spot being decided by the vidor lumberton game this week. But that's just me.

That’s what I’m thinking too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Vpirate02 said:

Honestly the way I see it is the spots will be determined this week. I'm sorry central but I don't think y'all have it this year. I got pam, ned, and png on top and the 4th spot being decided by the vidor lumberton game this week. But that's just me.

That's how I see it as well, but you never know.  This district almost always seems to have some kind of crazy ending to the season as far as seasons go.  Coin flips anyone?  Lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, bigdog said:

That's how I see it as well, but you never know.  This district almost always seems to have some kind of crazy ending to the season as far as seasons go.  Coin flips anyone?  Lol.

No coin flips this year, each team will play all of the district opponents, so it will be on established tie-breakers if needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Vpirate02 said:

Honestly the way I see it is the spots will be determined this week. I'm sorry central but I don't think y'all have it this year. I got pam, ned, and png on top and the 4th spot being decided by the vidor lumberton game this week. But that's just me.

We've got 31 Seniors that would disagree.  I wonder what our record would look like if we opened the season playing Livingston, Lee or Ozen and not Memorial and a pretty good Vidor team.  Our boys have 5 games left to determine if they get to play an additional week...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Like I said, even if it’s only 10% of the 100 kids BHISD takes from GCCISD each year, that’s 10 athletes per year and that’s being generous.  You’re right about the jobs with BHISD, BTW.  There’s more than 1 athlete from Baytown originally who got transferred to BHISD after a job opened up for Mama.
    • Here’s a link to another story about it This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...