AggiesAreWe Posted October 31, 2017 Report Posted October 31, 2017 48 minutes ago, TradenupBH said: Ozen numbers are 4A, hopefully BISD is smart and go 4A this go around and not opt to play up. Ozen did not have 4A numbers last realignment. They had 5A numbers which is why they are 5A now. BISD did not opt them up. BMTSoulja1 1 Quote
AggiesAreWe Posted October 31, 2017 Report Posted October 31, 2017 5A started at 1100. Ozen turned in 1121 last realignment. BMTSoulja1 1 Quote
Alpha Wolf Posted October 31, 2017 Report Posted October 31, 2017 On 10/29/2017 at 8:24 AM, REBgp said: I always visualize this at (not all but some) schools that are on the border, say cutoff is 400. Secretary to Admin, I've got 397 as of now unless I overlooked some. No. Stop. Send that number in. No doubt it's correct. Or, I've got 402 as of now. Should I submit it? No. Stop. Check every name. Good gosh, there have to be 3 or 4 that moved. Work all the overtime you need. We must be thorough. Don't come back until you've eliminated 3 off that list. And I bet that scenario plays out at a few. Creative math at its best lol. Quote
L-Train11 Posted October 31, 2017 Report Posted October 31, 2017 2 hours ago, AggiesAreWe said: Ozen did not have 4A numbers last realignment. They had 5A numbers which is why they are 5A now. BISD did not opt them up. Eventually people will realize this and quit saying that they chose to be in 5A texaslonghorn14, BlackShirts5, Alpha Wolf and 1 other 4 Quote
Clueless Posted October 31, 2017 Report Posted October 31, 2017 3 hours ago, AggiesAreWe said: Ozen did not have 4A numbers last realignment. They had 5A numbers which is why they are 5A now. BISD did not opt them up. If I remember correctly there was a thread about Ozen opting up two years ago, I must've missed the correction. Either way, for their sake, they need to be 4a. Quote
AggiesAreWe Posted October 31, 2017 Report Posted October 31, 2017 9 minutes ago, TradenupBH said: If I remember correctly there was a thread about Ozen opting up two years ago, I must've missed the correction. Either way, for their sake, they need to be 4a. The original number that Ozen reported two years ago had them below the 5A cutoff. But that number was incorrect. The correct number of 1121 was turned into UIL. There was no opting up. AthleticSupporter - Jock and BMTSoulja1 2 Quote
Clueless Posted October 31, 2017 Report Posted October 31, 2017 4 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said: The original number that Ozen reported two years ago had them below the 5A cutoff. But that number was incorrect. The correct number of 1121 was turned into UIL. There was no opting up. Gotcha, that Beaumont math gets me sometimes. Thanks L-Train11 1 Quote
MillerTime? Posted October 31, 2017 Report Posted October 31, 2017 Cleveland and Splendora will be 5a d2 GIJonesy 1 Quote
BMTSoulja1 Posted October 31, 2017 Report Posted October 31, 2017 4 hours ago, L-Train11 said: Eventually people will realize this and quit saying that they chose to be in 5A And let the chuuuuch say, Amen! L-Train11 1 Quote
Sportsfan1999 Posted November 1, 2017 Report Posted November 1, 2017 Carl Padilla new prediction: 6A 2180+ 252 teams 5A 1135-2179 257 teams D-I 1791-2179 128 teams D-II 1135-1790 129 teams #txhsfb @glere53 @ProfessorDiggs @SHSBulldog00 My 6A Re-Alignment highlights. 15 up from 5A, 4 new schools, 2 opting up. 252 schools in 6A! #txhsfb @glere53 @ProfessorDiggs @PigskinPrep Quote
GIJonesy Posted November 1, 2017 Report Posted November 1, 2017 Looking at Carl Padilla's numbers I think there is a good shot at both Montgomery schools being 5A DII. Possible district: Huntsville - 1789 Montgomery - 1751* A&M Consolidated - 1716 Bryan Rudder - 1663 Cleveland - 1400-1700 Brenham - 1479 Lake Creek - 1288* Splendora - 1156 * Estimated numbers from MISD website Quote
BlackShirts5 Posted November 1, 2017 Report Posted November 1, 2017 Baytown Sun posted GCM at 2166. Quote
Kegger Posted November 1, 2017 Report Posted November 1, 2017 1 hour ago, GIJonesy said: Looking at Carl Padilla's numbers I think there is a good shot at both Montgomery schools being 5A DII. Possible district: Huntsville - 1789 Montgomery - 1751* A&M Consolidated - 1716 Bryan Rudder - 1663 Cleveland - 1400-1700 Brenham - 1479 Lake Creek - 1288* Splendora - 1156 * Estimated numbers from MISD website Any way you slice it, Cleveland is going to have a rough time adjusting going up to 5A. Hell, they haven't really adjusted to being 4A Div I. However, I feel that this might be a better district for them than the possibility of going to play PNG, Vidor, Nederland, Dayton, Central, BH, and possibly Crosby. Quote
NHSBulldogFan Posted November 1, 2017 Report Posted November 1, 2017 Cleveland turned in a 1446 solidly 5a Quote
Kegger Posted November 1, 2017 Report Posted November 1, 2017 7 minutes ago, NHSBulldogFan said: Cleveland turned in a 1446 solidly 5a The kids that are moving into Cleveland are not bumping up their athletics dept. Or at least not their primary sports. But yes, Cleveland is definitely 5A. The last bond was to add to the HS not build a second HS. The projected growth has Cleveland going up to well over 2000 kids in the next 5 years. NHSBulldogFan 1 Quote
Sportsfan1999 Posted November 1, 2017 Report Posted November 1, 2017 Matt Stepp new projection MATT STEPP’S ESTIMATED CUTOFFSClass 6A: 2,170 and aboveClass 5A Division I: 1,770 to 2,169Class 5A Division II: 1,160 to 1,769Class 4A Division I: 785 to 1,159Class 4A Division II: 485 to 784Class 3A Division I: 330 to 484Class 3A Division II: 230 to 329Class 2A Division I: 165 to 229Class 2A Division II: 104.5 to 164Class 1A Division I: 63 to 104.4Class 1A Division II: 62 and below AthleticSupporter - Jock and Raiders94 2 Quote
Bigdog Posted November 1, 2017 Report Posted November 1, 2017 On 10/31/2017 at 11:16 AM, AggiesAreWe said: Ozen did not have 4A numbers last realignment. They had 5A numbers which is why they are 5A now. BISD did not opt them up. I was going by the projected cutoffs for this year. Unless they gained 50 or so students, they would be 4A next year. I know BISD didn't opt them up last time, but I don't know if they would do that this year to keep both Ozen and Central in the same class. Quote
Alpha Wolf Posted November 1, 2017 Report Posted November 1, 2017 4 minutes ago, bigdog said: I was going by the projected cutoffs for this year. Unless they gained 50 or so students, they would be 4A next year. I know BISD didn't opt them up last time, but I don't know if they would do that this year to keep both Ozen and Central in the same class. West Brook, Central and Ozen will all be in different classifications for the next 2 football season. I just hope the new AD stops forcing the 3 schools to play football games against each other. It doesn't really benefit West Brook in playing the 2 especially Ozen. West Brook needs to be playing schools around their size to benefit them more for district and the playoffs. When Ozen drops, they will have a plethora of 5A and 4A schools to choose from to complete their schedule. AthleticSupporter - Jock 1 Quote
NHSBulldogFan Posted November 1, 2017 Report Posted November 1, 2017 I think Cleveland will be grouped with Dayton, Barbers Hill, Nederland, PNG, Vidor, and Central. It looks like Crosby will go 5A division 1 at this point, If the UIL plans on 8 16 team districts for 5A Division 1 and 2 the question is will Livingston stay 5A or drop to 4A? If Livingston stays 5A and the UIL plans for 8 team districts then Livingston will probably be the 8th team. Quote
Kegger Posted November 1, 2017 Report Posted November 1, 2017 4 minutes ago, NHSBulldogFan said: I think Cleveland will be grouped with Dayton, Barbers Hill, Nederland, PNG, Vidor, and Central. It looks like Crosby will go 5A division 1 at this point, If the UIL plans on 8 16 team districts for 5A Division 1 and 2 the question is will Livingston stay 5A or drop to 4A? If that is the district then I would say this might be a case where it may be in Cleveland's best interest to request a move up into Kpark, Caney Creek, Porter, New Caney district. Who knows what the UIL will do. Quote
STiger85 Posted November 1, 2017 Report Posted November 1, 2017 So this areas 4A DI could look like this; Silsbee Lumberton Ozen Huffman Navasota LCM Bridge City Quote
Sportsfan1999 Posted November 1, 2017 Report Posted November 1, 2017 well if matt stepp is right then silsbee will be 4a Div 11 because they turned in 784!!! Quote
WOSgrad Posted November 1, 2017 Report Posted November 1, 2017 9 minutes ago, STiger85 said: So this areas 4A DI could look like this; Silsbee Lumberton Ozen Huffman Navasota LCM Bridge City If Matt's newest prediction hold, Silsbee won't be in that district. Quote
Sportsfan1999 Posted November 1, 2017 Report Posted November 1, 2017 9 minutes ago, STiger85 said: So this areas 4A DI could look like this; Silsbee Lumberton Ozen Huffman Navasota LCM Bridge City livingston would replace navasota, also if Stepp right is right splendora could be in the district...a lot uncertainties. Quote
coachbronk Posted November 1, 2017 Report Posted November 1, 2017 Any word on what Burkeville will decide to do? I would love to have another SETX six-man school. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.