Jump to content

Lumberton @ Ozen


Cottonmouth

Recommended Posts

On ‎10‎/‎21‎/‎2017 at 2:38 PM, L-Train11 said:

I predict that we will be getting a lot of young players playing time after we pull ahead in this game

If Lumberton don't do something with that offence it could be a long night. Lumberton has the talent on offence but the play calling is not to good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎10‎/‎21‎/‎2017 at 2:38 PM, L-Train11 said:

I predict that we will be getting a lot of young players playing time after we pull ahead in this game

I don't know about that.  If Coach Taylor and staff load the box for the run, put their biggest DB on #11 and their quickest on #10, I could see this going in the favor of the Panthers.  #24 left the game with a sprained ankle.  I doubt he will be 100%. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Cottonmouth said:

If Lumberton don't do something with that offence it could be a long night. Lumberton has the talent on offence but the play calling is not to good.

Ok, so with the talent level that we have, what would you do different? We have a good qb but don’t have the speed to run the spread. Have the leading rb in the district so of course we are gonna utilize him. And if you watch film you will see that blown assignments are usually what stops a play from being a positive play. I don’t think it’s play calling being the issue, I believe Babin is doing the best with what he’s got.

We were in the red zone about 5 times against central and because of silly mistakes and penalties we almost came up empty in that game. At some point the players need to be blamed for stuff like that. We actually outgained Central, so I don’t think it all can be blamed on play calling...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Jag Insider said:

I don't know about that.  If Coach Taylor and staff load the box for the run, put their biggest DB on #11 and their quickest on #10, I could see this going in the favor of the Panthers.  #24 left the game with a sprained ankle.  I doubt he will be 100%. 

You’ve got a point, and he probably won’t be 100% but I know he’ll give it his all with only two games left in his HS career. Conway is a good rb too and I just don’t see ozen pulling a win out in this one  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, L-Train11 said:

Ok, so with the talent level that we have, what would you do different? We have a good qb but don’t have the speed to run the spread. Have the leading rb in the district so of course we are gonna utilize him. And if you watch film you will see that blown assignments are usually what stops a play from being a positive play. I don’t think it’s play calling being the issue, I believe Babin is doing the best with what he’s got.

We were in the red zone about 5 times against central and because of silly mistakes and penalties we almost came up empty in that game. At some point the players need to be blamed for stuff like that. We actually outgained Central, so I don’t think it all can be blamed on play calling...

The only thing I'm saying is that if you watch what is called, its first play up the middle, second play up the middle, third play run outside. That's 90% of the play calling. That is why everyone stacks the box against Lumberton. I know that the coach is working with what he has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Cottonmouth said:

The only thing I'm saying is that if you watch what is called, its first play up the middle, second play up the middle, third play run outside. That's 90% of the play calling. That is why everyone stacks the box against Lumberton. I know that the coach is working with what he has.

Even if two plays are run up the middle it doesn’t necessarily mean they are the same play. And a lot of times those plays have reads that gives the qb an option.

Back in 2007 when we made our run we basically ran sweep, iso, power, and stretch. Only difference is back then the players believed that we could run it down people’s throats. We KNEW we were gonna win the battle up front. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, L-Train11 said:

Even if two plays are run up the middle it doesn’t necessarily mean they are the same play. And a lot of times those plays have reads that gives the qb an option.

Back in 2007 when we made our run we basically ran sweep, iso, power, and stretch. Only difference is back then the players believed that we could run it down people’s throats. We KNEW we were gonna win the battle up front. 

Was the head coach there when they made their run?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, L-Train11 said:

You’ve got a point, and he probably won’t be 100% but I know he’ll give it his all with only two games left in his HS career. Conway is a good rb too and I just don’t see ozen pulling a win out in this one  

If I had to pick a winner, I'd pick Lumberton...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Jag Insider said:

I say give him time.  Don't run him off to quick...

I agree Jag! He’s a great coach, and is very passionate about the kids. In the past every game would have looked like the PNG game this year, we would have been getting blown out. Now, for the most part, teams can’t overlook us. That’s a big step in the right direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cottonmouth said:

The only thing I'm saying is that if you watch what is called, its first play up the middle, second play up the middle, third play run outside. That's 90% of the play calling. That is why everyone stacks the box against Lumberton. I know that the coach is working with what he has.

Everyone stacks the box against Lumberton because 10 players are usually near the ball. Plus, you're right about their frequency with which they run the ball. Other than Ward, that offense is atrocious. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, jake94 said:

After seeing both teams play at Bulldog Stadium, I have no idea how Ozen beat Baytown Lee. I will take Lumberton by 21 or more.

From what I heard, Lee was trailing 21-16 but was on the verge of scoring the go ahead TD late in the game but they fumbled and Ozen returned the fumble for a TD.  So instead of Lee winning 23-21, they lost 28-16.  Lee is improving...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, L-Train11 said:

Ok, so with the talent level that we have, what would you do different? We have a good qb but don’t have the speed to run the spread. Have the leading rb in the district so of course we are gonna utilize him. And if you watch film you will see that blown assignments are usually what stops a play from being a positive play. I don’t think it’s play calling being the issue, I believe Babin is doing the best with what he’s got.

We were in the red zone about 5 times against central and because of silly mistakes and penalties we almost came up empty in that game. At some point the players need to be blamed for stuff like that. We actually outgained Central, so I don’t think it all can be blamed on play calling...

I disagree with you here buddy.  Just imagine if you had 4 WR's lined out wide and #24 in the backfield.  Running lanes would be there.  The QB seemed like an ok passer and runner.  You alls offensive line seemed decent.  You had 2 decent WR's.  There are other schools across the state that are comparable in size and demographics that make the spread work. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Jag Insider said:

I disagree with you here buddy.  Just imagine if you had 4 WR's lined out wide and #24 in the backfield.  Running lanes would be there.  The QB seemed like an ok passer and runner.  You alls offensive line seemed decent.  You had 2 decent WR's.  There are other schools across the state that are comparable in size and demographics that make the spread work. 

^^^ This

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jag Insider said:

I disagree with you here buddy.  Just imagine if you had 4 WR's lined out wide and #24 in the backfield.  Running lanes would be there.  The QB seemed like an ok passer and runner.  You alls offensive line seemed decent.  You had 2 decent WR's.  There are other schools across the state that are comparable in size and demographics that make the spread work. 

That would work to an extent. I still think opposing defenses would play man on the outside and stack the box until we start beating them with the passing game, which we wouldn’t do to most of the teams in our district. But that would open things up a little more for the rb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, L-Train11 said:

That would work to an extent. I still think opposing defenses would play man on the outside and stack the box until we start beating them with the passing game, which we wouldn’t do to most of the teams in our district. But that would open things up a little more for the rb.

The qb is good, just need to work on throwing more and teach the wr's how to run routes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Raiders94 said:

The qb is good, just need to work on throwing more and teach the wr's how to run routes

Qb is good and can scramble, and usually we have one or two decent receivers each year. Just not good enough to be a huge threat passing against teams like Pam, central, or even PNG/Nederland imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, L-Train11 said:

Qb is good and can scramble, and usually we have one or two decent receivers each year. Just not good enough to be a huge threat passing against teams like Pam, central, or even PNG/Nederland imo.

If you work at it, it can be good enough. I thing sense the coach was there when they made their run, he is trying to make work what worked 10 years ago. JMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined


  • Posts

    • It’s been awhile, but I seem to remember 5 D starters out & 2 O starters out (OL). A big difference is that Simon wasn’t involved yet. He’s totally changed LP’s rushing attack from last year as a bruising, explosive addition to Barnes, Sandolph & Bright. Last year—and early this season—LP was missing that element. Now, Coach Berneathy is not making talented players wait like many other coaches & even his predecessors at LP. If the kid can produce at the varsity level, they’re moved up. And man, has Simon produced! Over 1200 yards & 20 TD’s in less than a full season so far! It’s allowed LP to alternate RB’s where Barnes doesn’t take all the pounding. Barnes and Sandolph are also able to split out as receivers as desired to add threats that weren’t really an option last year. The PNG/LP game was a full-on tilt & good for both squads. I remember Gary Joseph in the end zone giving his son pointers as an extra set of eyes since he’d had experience with LP in past PO matchups. That was a good game. The score wasn’t really indicative of the game. Not sure anyone felt it was over until the final whistle! Good luck to y’all in Cajun Country. Bring back a win for SE Texas. (Yes. La Porte is still SETX. Ha!)
    • SEC fan bases before Texas got there: “The horns aren’t ready for this. Every week is a battle.” SEC fan bases after Texas arrived: “Texas has the easiest SEC schedule ever!” SEC fan bases after every one of their teams has lost to one or more SEC teams from the bottom half of the standings, many of whom Texas beat comfortably: 🤐
    • With a big win against the rival to close out the year… look to see Lamar make the playoffs next year 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...