Jump to content

The Enemy Amongst Us - OFA


Hagar

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, BS Wildcats said:

Obama, a true pos.  Maybe we are about to witness his change you can believe in rhetoric.  Wonder how much Soros and the Muslim Brotherhood are paying him for this service?  This is your man tobie and big girl.  Again, a true POS he is!!

Well, it appears the Clinton's made their fortune selling us out to the Russians, so Obama will make his selling us out to Soros.  There's no such thing as Honor in politics.  That's something our Founding Fathers could not comprehend.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, REBgp said:

This is the hidden content, please

Profound and Scary.

From the article: " It goes against our Constitution, our laws..."  Imagine that!  obama being involved in something that works against the Constitution!  Now you know why he put those sorry, anti-Constitution Judges in place.  Read the article and find out what I'm talking about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Reagan said:

From the article: " It goes against our Constitution, our laws..."  Imagine that!  obama being involved in something that works against the Constitution!  Now you know why he put those sorry, anti-Constitution Judges in place.  Read the article and find out what I'm talking about.

As I understand it, once a Fed judge is appointed by the president, it takes an act of Congress, literally, to remove him or her.  The HoR has to impeach, and the Senate has to have a trial.  They have more job security than virtually anyone.  No matter how many bad decisions  they make, no matter how incompetent, they are there for life.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Reagan said:

From the article: " It goes against our Constitution, our laws..."  Imagine that!  obama being involved in something that works against the Constitution!  Now you know why he put those sorry, anti-Constitution Judges in place.  Read the article and find out what I'm talking about.

Makes sense...this is a man that called the Constitution a "charter of negative liberties".

This is the hidden content, please

From the article:

Obama in his interview disparages the Constitution as merely "a charter of negative liberties. It says what the states can't do to you. Says what the federal government can't do to you but doesn't say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf." He believes—and he's right—that changing this is the way to bring about "redistributive change."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, new tobie said:

From folks that stood for the amthem, then went out and hung black folk from trees after raping their wives and daughters. Sent black men to fight for a country where they weren't free in. Rioted and protested four little girls going to school.

I guess we should take down the statues of these men. Can you show me where one is located?

And do you really wonder why nobody takes you serious? I'm sure your reasoning is mired in racism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, new tobie said:

From folks that stood for the amthem, then went out and hung black folk from trees after raping their wives and daughters. Sent black men to fight for a country where they weren't free in. Rioted and protested four little girls going to school.

You left out grab um.  Did these things you mentioned happen recently, or has times changed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Reagan said:

This is the hidden content, please

Great link.  It ties together the whole DNC, OFA, FGPS, scam.  What these people are doing challenges me in my use of the english language.  Words like scam, and despicable, in my mind, don't seem strong enough to convey how incredulous I find all this.  I'm not sure there are words.  Perhaps William F. Buckley could have described it, but I'm like a carpenter that only has pliers and a screwdriver, but needs a hammer.  To my simple self, the only thing that comes to mind is, "Off the charts".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level.  We'll be at McnNeese this Friday night at 6pm.
    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an easy and obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
    • @CIS_org National Security Senior Fellow @BensmanTodd tells Steve Bannon how the U.S. State Department and USAID have been sending American taxpayer funds to religious nonprofits to facilitate mass immigration to our southern border. Bensman says 248 nonprofits are participating in the United Nations’ 2024 agenda to distribute $1.6 billion in cash, transportation, food, and shelter to U.S.-bound immigrants across Mexico and Latin America.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...