Wb Tex Posted October 25, 2017 Report Posted October 25, 2017 Ya they the lowest and we're next.But like i said we not crying over here.A loss is a loss Quote
WOSgrad Posted October 25, 2017 Report Posted October 25, 2017 Newton, with a bustling enrollment of 289 has played (and beaten by more than 20 points): Silsbee (enrollment: 813), Diboll (enrollment: 513), Bridge City (enrollment: 763) and East Chambers (enrollment: 416). Quote
Wb Tex Posted October 25, 2017 Report Posted October 25, 2017 2 hours ago, WOSgrad said: Yeah, three state championships worth of difference. Name me one kid that was on all three of them championship teams thats playing this year Quote
WOSgrad Posted October 25, 2017 Report Posted October 25, 2017 4 minutes ago, Wb Tex said: Name me one kid that was on all three of them championship teams thats playing this year The same number of players that were on the 1982 championship team that are playing for the Brook. Quote
DannyShapiroBE Posted October 25, 2017 Author Report Posted October 25, 2017 5 minutes ago, WOSgrad said: Newton, with a bustling enrollment of 289 has played (and beaten by more than 20 points): Silsbee (enrollment: 813), Diboll (enrollment: 513), Bridge City (enrollment: 763) and East Chambers (enrollment: 416). Newton, WO-S and PN-G have all had impressive seasons. Ranking them 1 to 3 has been difficult, honestly. Wouldn't lose sleep over making any of those teams No. 1. Quote
Wb Tex Posted October 25, 2017 Report Posted October 25, 2017 4 minutes ago, WOSgrad said: The same number of players that were on the 1982 championship team that are playing for the Brook. Thank you your smart.You got the right answer.My point Quote
WOSgrad Posted October 25, 2017 Report Posted October 25, 2017 5 minutes ago, DannyShapiroBE said: Newton, WO-S and PN-G have all had impressive seasons. Ranking them 1 to 3 has been difficult, honestly. Wouldn't lose sleep over making any of those teams No. 1. A reasonable argument could be made for all 3. eagleswoodville#1 1 Quote
WOSgrad Posted October 25, 2017 Report Posted October 25, 2017 20 minutes ago, Wb Tex said: Thank you your smart.You got the right answer.My point No, I know that I am smart. I know how to spell words and use correct grammar. The Eagles don't need any players from those past teams to have the season that they are currently having...beating teams by a average score of 54-13. Perhaps the Bruins could have used the likes of Jerry Ball, though, over the last couple of weeks. I really don't like doing this. I like the Bruins. I think they are a good team that had a couple of bad weeks. I like Eric Peevey and thought he was a good choice (even though I can pull up the posts that showed many of you didn't). In fact, you may want to hit him up on the quality of football in the smaller ranks, seeing as he IS an Orangefield graduate and he himself from first-hand experience can tell you about the quality of the Newton program. Fast Turtle 1 Quote
AggiesAreWe Posted October 26, 2017 Report Posted October 26, 2017 Newton having much better season than West Brook. That's why they should be ranked higher. eagleswoodville#1 1 Quote
Wb Tex Posted October 26, 2017 Report Posted October 26, 2017 Your right about that .But people on here acting like they would run 6a Quote
WOSgrad Posted October 26, 2017 Report Posted October 26, 2017 12 minutes ago, Wb Tex said: Your right about that .But people on here acting like they would run 6a I haven't seen anybody say that. I have seen a lot of you discounting the success that others have simply because they aren't 6A. DatBoyLenny 1 Quote
Wb Tex Posted October 26, 2017 Report Posted October 26, 2017 Well you've seen them act like they can beat wb Quote
WOSgrad Posted October 26, 2017 Report Posted October 26, 2017 12 minutes ago, Wb Tex said: Well you've seen them act like they can beat wb Actually, I have seen the opposite. In fact, all who have commented on that facet here have acknowledged that a matchup involving West Brook and their team would result in a Bruin victory. I'll quote them if you like. I have seen a lot of "if you're team ain't in 6A, you shouldn't speak on this." I can quote you those, too. L-Train11 1 Quote
WOSgrad Posted October 26, 2017 Report Posted October 26, 2017 Let's see. There is this. On 10/24/2017 at 2:19 PM, Tigers2010 said: I'm with you. I think they would mop up 8 teams on this list, maybe get challenged in the 1st half by 2. But then I have to think about it differently for it to make sense. IF Bama were to lose back to back weeks, even to a Clemson and Penn State, would they fall out of the top 10? Probably. But as far as who would beat who, WB would be too much for anybody on this list. Quote
WOSgrad Posted October 26, 2017 Report Posted October 26, 2017 And then there is this: On 10/24/2017 at 2:43 PM, CCRed said: I'm just wondering if those teams are considered to be the top 10 in the area ? I just don't think any of those teams could beat Westbrook. Are all of those teams listed considered to be better than Westbrook ? Quote
WOSgrad Posted October 26, 2017 Report Posted October 26, 2017 Oh, I forgot about this one. On 10/24/2017 at 2:50 PM, ROSCHONSBIGBRO said: If you do it by who beats who of course wb would be 1, they 6a but that's stupid because they have two L's. This litst is put together by wins and losses. It's fairly obvious and to me it makes sense. What's confusing to me is everyone else's confusion. Even as you scroll through the images, you see teams with increasing losses. By the other logic wb could lose 5 games and be #1 because they would probably still beat everyone else around Quote
WOSgrad Posted October 26, 2017 Report Posted October 26, 2017 And this one: On 10/24/2017 at 3:21 PM, aTmfan06 said: This isn’t going off teams beating each other on this poll correct? Kinda more of a pound for pound kinda deal I think. So West Brook has lost 2 games in a row. The last one which they got taken to the woodshed. Maybe not completely out of the top 10 but definitely 7-10. Quote
WOSgrad Posted October 26, 2017 Report Posted October 26, 2017 On 10/24/2017 at 3:28 PM, AggiesAreWe said: An 0-9 West Brook team would beat a 9-0 Evadale. So Evadale should not be allowed to be in an area top 10 poll? Just cannot do a ranking of multiple classifications based on that theory. Oops, I forgot about this one Quote
WOSgrad Posted October 26, 2017 Report Posted October 26, 2017 6 hours ago, eagleswoodville#1 said: As for Woodville....yall would beat us, of course. Probably by a pretty large amount. But I promise you'd think a little differently than you do now. Your defense would remember playing little ole Woodville. Oh, there was also this one. Quote
WOSgrad Posted October 26, 2017 Report Posted October 26, 2017 On 10/24/2017 at 4:35 PM, Wb Tex said: We play big boy ball at the brook This was the start of yours. Quote
WOSgrad Posted October 26, 2017 Report Posted October 26, 2017 On 10/24/2017 at 6:46 PM, NewtonNation said: Lufkin plays big boy ball at the brook. Oops, sorry. I know that wasn't yours. But that was damned funny! BTW, NewtonNation, you owe me a new computer screen cause I spewed soft drink all over my screen about the same time GATA fell out of his lawn chair. BMTSoulja1, L-Train11, studd88 and 1 other 4 Quote
WOSgrad Posted October 26, 2017 Report Posted October 26, 2017 On 10/24/2017 at 6:51 PM, Wb Tex said: They beat us we beat them.Get your enrollment up.Then and only then you should open your mouth There was this one of yours. Quote
WOSgrad Posted October 26, 2017 Report Posted October 26, 2017 12 hours ago, Wb Tex said: If a kid but up some good numbers at legacy everyone going to be saying look at what he's playing.So to me it's the same way in any classification if your not play what that teams is playing .You shouldn't speak on it. There was this beauty from you. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.