NHSBulldogFan Posted October 30, 2017 Report Posted October 30, 2017 13 hours ago, Matthew328 said: Ozen was 1121....I think that drops them to 4A......I haven't gotten a confirmed # on Central yet.....I dont have the HC's cell # LOL Any chance Beaumont ISD makes them stay in 5a Quote
WOSgrad Posted October 30, 2017 Author Report Posted October 30, 2017 4 minutes ago, NHSBulldogFan said: Maybe Livingston is trying to get to right number this go around Their problems for this past realignment stem from the fact that they turned in the wrong number to the UIL, not that they revealed that number to the public. NHSBulldogFan 1 Quote
NHSBulldogFan Posted October 30, 2017 Report Posted October 30, 2017 3 minutes ago, WOSgrad said: Their problems for this past realignment stem from the fact that they turned in the wrong number to the UIL, not that they revealed that number to the public. I’m sure they got it right this year...any other schools making you jump through hoops to get snapshot numbers Quote
CCRed Posted October 30, 2017 Report Posted October 30, 2017 I haven't seen Crosby's yet. Anybody know ? texbuzz 1 Quote
WOSgrad Posted October 30, 2017 Author Report Posted October 30, 2017 42 minutes ago, NHSBulldogFan said: I’m sure they got it right this year...any other schools making you jump through hoops to get snapshot numbers No, there are some that didn't respond to the request, but there was only one demand for a FOI request. According, to Matt Stepp, that is not unheard of. However, this is the 3rd time (at least) that I have requested shapshot numbers and that was a first for me Quote
WOSgrad Posted October 30, 2017 Author Report Posted October 30, 2017 1 hour ago, CCRed said: I haven't seen Crosby's yet. Anybody know ? Not yet. I figure that the lack of response, which is unusual for Coach Riordan and others, can be chalked up to the fact that snapshot day was on a Friday when coaches were concentrating on far more pressing matters. Quote
texbuzz Posted October 30, 2017 Report Posted October 30, 2017 1 hour ago, WOSgrad said: Not yet. I figure that the lack of response, which is unusual for Coach Riordan and others, can be chalked up to the fact that snapshot day was on a Friday when coaches were concentrating on far more pressing matters. I spoke to somebody that should know. There was some questions that needed to be cleared up about some kids. "Need to make sure the number we provide is accurate." The person was not interested in explaining any further. AthleticSupporter - Jock and NHSBulldogFan 2 Quote
Matthew328 Posted October 30, 2017 Report Posted October 30, 2017 I got Crosby's # today its 1780 Quote
Clueless Posted October 31, 2017 Report Posted October 31, 2017 Crosby might go D1 with those numbers Quote
Hagar Posted October 31, 2017 Report Posted October 31, 2017 21 hours ago, WOSgrad said: Burkeville - 75 They need to seriously considering going to 6 man. Does the UIL have a minimum number before you can play 11 man? Look, their closest game this year was Evadale beating them 47-0, and best Evadale RB only ran once for an 80 yd TD, and Rebs tried 49 yd FG on first down. Only scored 8 points all year. Not only is it humiliating for the kids, it's dangerous, as they face bigger opponents. SMDH. Quote
WOSgrad Posted October 31, 2017 Author Report Posted October 31, 2017 8 minutes ago, REBgp said: They need to seriously considering going to 6 man. Does the UIL have a minimum number before you can play 11 man? Look, their closest game this year was Evadale beating them 47-0, and best Evadale RB only ran once for an 80 yd TD, and Rebs tried 49 yd FG on first down. Only scored 8 points all year. Not only is it humiliating for the kids, it's dangerous, as they face bigger opponents. SMDH. Any team that is below the Class 2A, DII minimum can opt for 6 man football. Matt Stepp's prediction is that figure will be 105. Coach Thomas did not indicate whether or not Burkeville would petition for 6 man football. Hagar 1 Quote
Hagar Posted October 31, 2017 Report Posted October 31, 2017 4 minutes ago, WOSgrad said: Any team that is below the Class 2A, DII minimum can opt for 6 man football. Matt Stepp's prediction is that figure will be 105. Coach Thomas did not indicate whether or not Burkeville would petition for 6 man football. Thanks grad. Surely they will go 6 man. They had a couple of real good athletes that would've been stars in six man. Quote
texbuzz Posted October 31, 2017 Report Posted October 31, 2017 On 10/27/2017 at 10:24 AM, AggiesAreWe said: East Chambers 435 texasfootball.com data says 434. I scraped their data and I am adding the numbers noted in this thread. I will highlight the thread numbers. When there is a discrepancy, I will refer to the TF website (I think those are official). I should have a google sheet shortly. Quote
AggiesAreWe Posted October 31, 2017 Report Posted October 31, 2017 6 minutes ago, texbuzz said: texasfootball.com data says 434. I scraped their data and I am adding the numbers noted in this thread. I will highlight the thread numbers. When there is a discrepancy, I will refer to the TF website (I think those are official). I should have a google sheet shortly. My number came straight from an EC coach. Quote
texbuzz Posted October 31, 2017 Report Posted October 31, 2017 3 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said: My number came straight from an EC coach. Ok. I will update and highlight. Quote
texbuzz Posted October 31, 2017 Report Posted October 31, 2017 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up I used the projection divisional breakdowns for this. I probably spent stupid time doing this but if you want access to modify, just let me know. I didn't create sheets for the divisions. BigMike0726 1 Quote
texbuzz Posted October 31, 2017 Report Posted October 31, 2017 32 minutes ago, texbuzz said: This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up I used the projection divisional breakdowns for this. I probably spent stupid time doing this but if you want access to modify, just let me know. I didn't create sheets for the divisions. I like you guys. don't get me wrong. It would be kinda cool if somebody would double check and make sure my email and name isn't visible from that link. Just curious. I don't need any more emails for "lengthening pills". I'm stocked up. Quote
NHSBulldogFan Posted October 31, 2017 Report Posted October 31, 2017 Highland Park turned in a 2180 meaning the 5a 6a cut off line will be somewhere above 2181 The Icon and KF89 2 Quote
AggiesAreWe Posted October 31, 2017 Report Posted October 31, 2017 2 hours ago, texbuzz said: Ok. I will update and highlight. Got confirmation. East Chambers official number is 434 Quote
BigMike0726 Posted October 31, 2017 Report Posted October 31, 2017 32 minutes ago, texbuzz said: I like you guys. don't get me wrong. It would be kinda cool if somebody would double check and make sure my email and name isn't visible from that link. Just curious. I don't need any more emails for "lengthening pills". I'm stocked up. I don't see your name or email on it. Quote
WOSgrad Posted October 31, 2017 Author Report Posted October 31, 2017 It doesn't change anything, but the official number for WO-S is 581. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.