Jump to content

Hitchcock 60 Hardin 0/FINAL

WOSgrad

By WOSgrad
in High School Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

BIG A

BIG A

Posted
Posted

Yes I am being sarcastic but when your offense line can’t block and the defense knows what play your running before you snap the ball. I would say out coached and out played for the last 3 weeks. The kids are starting to shut down and not wanting to play the game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AggiesAreWe

AggiesAreWe

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, Who Cares said:

Yes I am being sarcastic but when your offense line can’t block and the defense knows what play your running before you snap the ball. I would say out coached and out played for the last 3 weeks. The kids are starting to shut down and not wanting to play the game. 

Not under the great Haynes regime?? No way!

Who stated it's not what you do in non-district but what you do in district? Didn't several predict zero district wins for Hardin and several Hardin fans dispute that prediction?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
oldschool2

oldschool2

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, Who Cares said:

Yes I am being sarcastic but when your offense line can’t block and the defense knows what play your running before you snap the ball. I would say out coached and out played for the last 3 weeks. The kids are starting to shut down and not wanting to play the game. 

Lol.  Look...the issue is and has always been the fact that Hardin is just out gunned.  I think Haynes is definitely a good football coach.  And the best thing he did was gutting the preseason schedule.  But adding a new QB and different game plan will only get you so far.  I’m not sure what everyone expected but you still have a bunch of kids on that team that went 0-10 last year.  So again...it’s the kids.  Want long term success? It starts with consistency.  Leave the coaches alone and consistency will lead to better things.

or...jump back on the “time for a new coach” carrousel and continue with your “1 out of 10-15 years good” routine.  Either way I don’t care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BIG A

BIG A

Posted
Posted

Gutting the preseason schedule was the good, but they should have played better teams that would have helped them instead of playing a team that couldn’t spell football and a JV team. I know your going to say a 5A school, but still a JV.   You would be crazy to change the QB, he’s one of the best players on the team. They have the speed and players to compete but need something different. Especially when next year will be an offensive building year. I have watched these boys play since they were little and the potential is there to be a competive team and not 0-3 in district. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
camsdad

camsdad

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, Who Cares said:

Gutting the preseason schedule was the good, but they should have played better teams that would have helped them instead of playing a team that couldn’t spell football and a JV team. I know your going to say a 5A school, but still a JV.   You would be crazy to change the QB, he’s one of the best players on the team. They have the speed and players to compete but need something different. Especially when next year will be an offensive building year. I have watched these boys play since they were little and the potential is there to be a competive team and not 0-3 in district. 

 

This Hardin team is improved, but the talent level IS NOT where it needs to be to be competitive in every game. Look back at the 2007-2009 teams. The talent is not even close to where it was then yet they made a second round exit in 2007 and were one and done in 2008. The community has got to stop complaining about the coaches and truly get behind  the entire staff and show their support. Maybe, just maybe, the offensive line was outmatched. Is that possible?  Maybe they didn’t do as well because they had 7 kids out last night with injuries. Is that possible?  Probably not. I’m sure Coach Haynes and staff plotted throughout the week how they could go to Hitchcock and get beat 60-0. After all, assistant coaches love getting beat badly because it really helps them to advance their career. I’m sure Haynes came out of retirement for this exact reason-he loves getting beat. Come on Hardin fans, support the staff, give them time, and good things may very well happen in a few years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
oldschool2

oldschool2

Posted
Posted
28 minutes ago, Who Cares said:

Gutting the preseason schedule was the good, but they should have played better teams that would have helped them instead of playing a team that couldn’t spell football and a JV team. I know your going to say a 5A school, but still a JV.   You would be crazy to change the QB, he’s one of the best players on the team. They have the speed and players to compete but need something different. Especially when next year will be an offensive building year. I have watched these boys play since they were little and the potential is there to be a competive team and not 0-3 in district. 

 

I think scheduling teams you can beat is absolutely important.  You have to build confidence.  A coach has to be able to say “my stuff works” and then prove it thru winning.  Nobody cares who you beat.  Their schedule last year was better for preparation for district.  How’d that work out?

And just to be clear.  You saw them play growing up?.. Just WHO exactly did you see them play?  I haven’t the slightest idea but I’m willing to bet these boys didn’t play a single team in Hardin’s district right now in youth sports.  Youth sports is normally for neighboring towns if there aren’t enough kids to keep it “in city”.  Which means you have no basis for comparison with the teams they’re playing now.  Not to mention the fact that quite a bit changes between “growing up” and by the time they’re in high school.  Ridiculous statement.

By the way I said “new” qb because their qb didn’t play a single game last yr.  And he is “one of the best players on the team”... as you put it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
camsdad

camsdad

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, oldschool2 said:

I think scheduling teams you can beat is absolutely important.  You have to build confidence.  A coach has to be able to say “my stuff works” and then prove it thru winning.  Nobody cares who you beat.  Their schedule last year was better for preparation for district.  How’d that work out?

And just to be clear.  You saw them play growing up?.. Just WHO exactly did you see them play?  I haven’t the slightest idea but I’m willing to bet these boys didn’t play a single team in Hardin’s district right now in youth sports.  Youth sports is normally for neighboring towns if there aren’t enough kids to keep it “in city”.  Which means you have no basis for comparison with the teams they’re playing now.  Not to mention the fact that quite a bit changes between “growing up” and by the time they’re in high school.  Ridiculous statement.

By the way I said “new” qb because their qb didn’t play a single game last yr.  And he is “one of the best players on the team”... as you put it.

Amen. I’m out of likes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
About a week ago

About a week ago

Posted
Posted

Hitchcock is probably the best team in the district. I hope my Bucs prove me wrong, but this loss is not unexpected. La Marque beat themselves and still won the game. EC was not 100% and still was in control the entire game. Hitchcock was a bad matchup for Hardin, they are a solid football team. As far as improving from last year, it's a different ball team. EC loss three fumbles inside the Hardin 15yrd online last year, still won 56-6. Also Snell is probably the best passing QB in the district. He might be Hardin's only 1st team player. If they run Haynes off, they will suffer for longer. But I don't care what you say, Belichek couldn't win the Super Bowl coaching the Browns. Talent is short in Hardin. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Cu Chulainn
      Orangefield 65 Livingston 83/FINAL

      By Cu Chulainn · Posted

      Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level.  We'll be at McnNeese this Friday night at 6pm.
    • TxHoops
      Susan Smith

      By TxHoops · Posted

      I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an easy and obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • setxathlete14
      2024 WOS Mustangs

      By setxathlete14 · Posted

      1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
    • Reagan
      Trump Wins

      By Reagan · Posted

      AMEN!
    • Reagan
      JoeBama Administration Gives NGOs Millions To Facilitate Immigration Invasion!

      By Reagan · Posted

      @CIS_org National Security Senior Fellow @BensmanTodd tells Steve Bannon how the U.S. State Department and USAID have been sending American taxpayer funds to religious nonprofits to facilitate mass immigration to our southern border. Bensman says 248 nonprofits are participating in the United Nations’ 2024 agenda to distribute $1.6 billion in cash, transportation, food, and shelter to U.S.-bound immigrants across Mexico and Latin America.

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...