Good, Important Questions!

[Reagan]

From the article:  "... first big question is just where was Mr. Mueller when Paul Manafort was supposedly breaking the law all those years ago?  Levin first noted that the charges against Manafort don’t rise to the level of a special counsel and appear to be just the routine stuff a local state’s attorney should be handling.   But, when did most of this occur?  It occurred 2006 through 2014. Robert Mueller was the FBI Director from 2001 to 2013. So, much of what Mr. Mueller is charging today occurred while Mr. Mueller was the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.  Which leads to the obvious question, to me. If, in fact, these horrific criminal conspiracies and the rest were taking place from 2006 to 2014 and Mr. Mueller was the FBI director from 2001 to 2013, where was Mr. Mueller when he was the FBI director (while these crimes were being committed)?   Levin then noted, “Most of this occurred under Barack Obama’s watch.”   That is a seriously important point. If all these crimes Mueller is all worked up about today occurred while he was the director of the top police agency in the country… well, why didn’t he prosecute them then?    Levin also asked, “Where was the United States Attorney from the District of Columbia?  These are not special counsel investigative activities.  These are routine, white collar crime or criminal activities… where was the law enforcement apparatus under Barack Obama while this was taking place?   Levin points out that the FBI has been looking at all this since 2014 James Comey was in the FBI and yet, none of these criminal activities were being committed."   Very interesting indeed!  I'm wondering if the MSM will also ask these questions? 

 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[Hagar]

19 hours ago, Reagan said:

From the article:  "... first big question is just where was Mr. Mueller when Paul Manafort was supposedly breaking the law all those years ago?  Levin first noted that the charges against Manafort don’t rise to the level of a special counsel and appear to be just the routine stuff a local state’s attorney should be handling.   But, when did most of this occur?  It occurred 2006 through 2014. Robert Mueller was the FBI Director from 2001 to 2013. So, much of what Mr. Mueller is charging today occurred while Mr. Mueller was the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.  Which leads to the obvious question, to me. If, in fact, these horrific criminal conspiracies and the rest were taking place from 2006 to 2014 and Mr. Mueller was the FBI director from 2001 to 2013, where was Mr. Mueller when he was the FBI director (while these crimes were being committed)?   Levin then noted, “Most of this occurred under Barack Obama’s watch.”   That is a seriously important point. If all these crimes Mueller is all worked up about today occurred while he was the director of the top police agency in the country… well, why didn’t he prosecute them then?    Levin also asked, “Where was the United States Attorney from the District of Columbia?  These are not special counsel investigative activities.  These are routine, white collar crime or criminal activities… where was the law enforcement apparatus under Barack Obama while this was taking place?   Levin points out that the FBI has been looking at all this since 2014 James Comey was in the FBI and yet, none of these criminal activities were being committed."   Very interesting indeed!  I'm wondering if the MSM will also ask these questions? 

 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

You & I both know the MSM aren't going to question Mueller.  And here's the deal with Manafort.  Mueller is going to put Manafort's testicles in a vice to get him to rat on others.  That's the reason (maybe the only reason) Manafort has been indicted.  Just bait to catch bigger fish.  But the fact that the Russians bribery to Hillary for Uranium 1took place under Muellers watch, makes a lot of people question his impartiality.  

I will say this, I'd love for Hillary and her entourage to come under this type of scrutiny.  

[77]

They didnt care because they thought clinton was a sure thing!