Jump to content

Religion Of Peace Update:

Reagan

By Reagan
in Political Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

Kountzer

Kountzer

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Englebert said:

And Obama was born in Hawaii. Aliens built the pyramids. The moon landing was fake. The FDA has the cure for cancer, but will not release it. Goodyear has created a car tire that will last the lifetime of the car, but will also not make it available to the public.The Holocaust never happened. Bush blew up the levees in New Orleans. Bigfoot is alive and well and living outside Seattle. This is fun. Your turn. (I hope this paragraph wasn't too long for a short attention span.)

I'm glad you don't believe me.  Thousands of books have been written on this topic by well educated witnesses.  Thousands of books have disappeared or been obscured.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hagar

Hagar

Posted
Posted
17 hours ago, Kountzer said:

Another 'religion of peace", a so called christian institution, plotted and sank the titanic.  Assassinated several us presidents including JFK and Lincoln.  Killed 50 million people they considered heretics.  Set up Hitler.  Hitler would of never come to power without this group.  Assisted in the killing of 6 million jews.  And on and on.   As stated before, apostate christianity is just as deadly as islam, if not more so.

No doubt many Christians supported Hitler, but they had no idea what he planned to do.  Now we have "Christians" who vote for killing unborn babies in abortion clinics.  Bad business, that.

BTW, I wouldn't be telling a lot of people that a Christian Institution sank the Titanic.  You lose all credibility with that story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Englebert

Englebert

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Kountzer said:

...didn 't just support Hitler.   They put him into office, hand picked.

Who told you that? Did the people that put him in power do so based solely on religious beliefs? What are some of the other mitigating factors that held weight on his hand-picked support? Do these factors outweigh the religious aspects? Please show your expertise on this subject so we can laugh then shred your arguments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BLUEDOVE3

BLUEDOVE3

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, REBgp said:

No doubt many Christians supported Hitler, but they had no idea what he planned to do.  Now we have "Christians" who vote for killing unborn babies in abortion clinics.  Bad business, that.

BTW, I wouldn't be telling a lot of people that a Christian Institution sank the Titanic.  You lose all credibility with that story.

And there are so-called Christians supporting a guy like Trump. Wow! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hagar

Hagar

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, BLUEDOVE3 said:

And there are so-called Christians supporting a guy like Trump. Wow! 

And there are so called Christians, and so called civilized people who support killing unborn or just born babies, so they can sell the body parts.  

And I use to wonder where the Nazis found people to murder all those Jews.  Now I see folks doing the same thing in Americah.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kountzer

Kountzer

Posted
Posted

Christians by definition follow Christ.   If a group or an individual calls themselves christian but they are not following Christ something is wrong.  If Christ says zig and you consistently zag are you really & truly a follower of Christ?

Abortion is more like a political football.  People cry about it, but once the baby is born they snatch formula out of the babies mouth, to build a wall or something.  Or deport their working parents and leave the babies and children to fend for themselves.  All you have to do is follow the money and you can tell exactly how much somebody really cares.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LumRaiderFan

LumRaiderFan

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Kountzer said:

Christians by definition follow Christ.   If a group or an individual calls themselves christian but they are not following Christ something is wrong.  If Christ says zig and you consistently zag are you really & truly a follower of Christ?

Abortion is more like a political football.  People cry about it, but once the baby is born they snatch formula out of the babies mouth, to build a wall or something.  Or deport their working parents and leave the babies and children to fend for themselves.  All you have to do is follow the money and you can tell exactly how much somebody really cares.

Abortion = a dead child, period.  You want to argue about responsibilities after the child is born, fine.  There are plenty of volunteer organizations and churches that provide support.  Go join up with one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Kountzer said:

Christians by definition follow Christ.   If a group or an individual calls themselves christian but they are not following Christ something is wrong.  If Christ says zig and you consistently zag are you really & truly a follower of Christ?

Abortion is more like a political football.  People cry about it, but once the baby is born they snatch formula out of the babies mouth, to build a wall or something.  Or deport their working parents and leave the babies and children to fend for themselves.  All you have to do is follow the money and you can tell exactly how much somebody really cares.

Your entire second paragraph is nothing more than the result of things that people brought upon themselves, then blame someone else for their plight. Shameful

Don't have unprotected sex if you can't afford to feed the baby. Don't enter countries illegally and you can't be deported. Takes a certain mind set to see it any other way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LumRaiderFan

LumRaiderFan

Posted
Posted
38 minutes ago, baddog said:

Your entire second paragraph is nothing more than the result of things that people brought upon themselves, then blame someone else for their plight. Shameful

Don't have unprotected sex if you can't afford to feed the baby. Don't enter countries illegally and you can't be deported. Takes a certain mind set to see it any other way.

Same old story...Republicans want to push Grandma off the cliff, take food out of kid's mouths, blah, blah, blah.

We are becoming a nation that EXPECTS the gov to provide all our needs.  Dems have figured out how to cater to this dependency by promising to provide just enough crumbs to get their vote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stevenash

stevenash

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Abortion = a dead child, period.  You want to argue about responsibilities after the child is born, fine.  There are plenty of volunteer organizations and churches that provide support.  Go join up with one.

He may be referring to the large number of single parent families

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ty Cobb

Ty Cobb

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Kountzer said:

Abortion is more like a political football.  People cry about it, but once the baby is born they snatch formula out of the babies mouth, to build a wall or something.  Or deport their working parents and leave the babies and children to fend for themselves.  All you have to do is follow the money and you can tell exactly how much somebody really cares.

When has President Trump, or any form of government ever taken food away from a child?  I have never heard of a person walking into a home and taking a child's food.  If you are referring to welfare, which is one of the 3 worst laws ever made remember that parents, not the government, are responsible for taking care of and supporting a child.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kountzer

Kountzer

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, stevenash said:

Of course no food has ever been taken away.  However, they have said it so often for so long that they believe it.

Food stamps and other provisions have never bankrupted this country, but republicans site it so often they believe it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stevenash

stevenash

Posted
Posted
44 minutes ago, Kountzer said:

Food stamps and other provisions have never bankrupted this country, but republicans site it so often they believe it.

No, they believe that if we do not get a handle on it,  ( the growth in the programs and the addition of more programs) it could lead to serious financial issues.  But, from your perspective, who cares, right?  As long as you can get more money from other people via confiscatory taxes, that is a lot easier than promoting self sufficiency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    46,207
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Separation Scientist
      Barbers Hill (28) vs La Porte (55) - FINAL

      By Separation Scientist · Posted

      That should tell everyone something pretty clearly. Does anyone really think BH is recruiting elementary kids, to get them to transfer in Jr. high? Seriously? Here is the "dirty little secret" about BH: Most people move to the district for a quality living environment to raise their young family, and benefit from the outstanding acedemics at BH. Even If all athlectics suddenly disappeared from BH, people would still want their kids in the district. If thats not enough to convince anyone, and BH really was determined to recruit, first step would be to have open enrollemnt. It is closed.        Yes, I get it, no one ever wants to give BH the benefit of the doubt on anything. Some of the accusations are beyond ridiculous though. This paranoia the BH critics are afflicted with is not just sad, its flat out laughable.     
    • setxathlete14
      Livingston Open

      By setxathlete14 · Posted

      Opting is always an option. Are they considering any BC assistants? Highly qualified after that season they put up. 
    • SmashMouth
      Waco La Vega (42) vs West Orange-Stark (20) - FINAL

      By SmashMouth · Posted

      Be that as it may, only time will tell. Hide and watch. Don’t be surprised if the next HC hire uses his own recipe. That happens more than not historically. I am not arguing the point that Hooks & CT had a winning combination that could’ve been carried over. I’m saying that finding someone to do that is not going to be as easy as one might think. Tell me again why Saban’s replacement, who even has Saban’s assistance if he wants it, just lost another game to an unranked team and has taken the Tide out of playoff contention? Why wouldn’t he just follow the success of possibly the greatest college football coach ever lived? 
    • WOSdrummer99
      Waco La Vega (42) vs West Orange-Stark (20) - FINAL

      By WOSdrummer99 · Posted

      We've acknowledged having 2 HOF coaches hasn't been like most other schools. So why everyone jumps to the conclusion it wouldn't work here is beyond my comprehension. I see it carry over with these other hires. Gilmer, Aledo, North Shore, Austin Westlake. Next man up that continues the system in place has instant success. Matter fact there was 2 rookie HC that won the state championship the same year we handed over the keys. Same book. Same recipe. Better ingredients.
    • Reagan
      Trump Wins

      By Reagan · Posted

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...