Reagan Posted November 30, 2017 Report Share Posted November 30, 2017 The yearbook inscription In Roy Moore's case is a forgery! This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted November 30, 2017 Report Share Posted November 30, 2017 Moore's accusers have ties to drug dealers and the Washington Post. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted December 1, 2017 Report Share Posted December 1, 2017 One of Moore's accusers admits to making unsupported claims against him! This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up 77 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted December 2, 2017 Report Share Posted December 2, 2017 LumRaiderFan 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted December 3, 2017 Report Share Posted December 3, 2017 71% think the allegations against Roy Moore are false. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted December 7, 2017 Report Share Posted December 7, 2017 Ann Coulter unravels the false accusations against Roy Moore. From the article: "Are we allowed to mention that Moore denies the charges? It’s hard to disprove accusations from 40 years ago — that’s why we have statutes of limitations — but, despite that, there are a surprising number of problems with the allegations against Moore. One accuser has been called a liar by her own stepson, who says he’s voting for Moore. Another neglected to mention that Moore sent her brother to prison. In defense of one of Moore’s accusers, Gloria Allred produced a yearbook allegedly signed by Moore, apparently in two different inks and giving his title as “D.A.” He was not the district attorney and didn’t sign his name that way. Allred refuses to produce the yearbook for handwriting analysis or to deny that it’s a forgery. Contrary to what you have heard one million times a day on TV, there aren’t “multiple accusers.” There are two, and that’s including the one with the fishy yearbook inscription whose stepson says she’s lying." This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TxHoops Posted December 7, 2017 Report Share Posted December 7, 2017 I say vote the pedophile in. There will be less chance for harassment claims since the ones working on the Hill are likely too old for this sicko’s taste. Plus, it will be fun watching the cannabalism among the Pubies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted December 7, 2017 Report Share Posted December 7, 2017 4 hours ago, TxHoops said: I say vote the pedophile in. There will be less chance for harassment claims since the ones working on the Hill are likely too old for this sicko’s taste. Plus, it will be fun watching the cannabalism among the Pubies. Your presumptions are overwhelming! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Englebert Posted December 7, 2017 Report Share Posted December 7, 2017 8 hours ago, TxHoops said: I say vote the pedophile in. There will be less chance for harassment claims since the ones working on the Hill are likely too old for this sicko’s taste. Plus, it will be fun watching the cannabalism among the Pubies. If you were a juror, would you convict Moore based on the evidence before you? I find it very, very, very difficult to believe that someone in your line of work would fall victim to such blatant manipulation that is readily refuted by even the novice of novices. Let me ask the question another way, if Moore was your client, do you think he would be convicted? Could you muster a convincing defense against such scant and problematic evidence? I think even I could defend someone in his position (with absolutely no formal training). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TxHoops Posted December 7, 2017 Report Share Posted December 7, 2017 21 minutes ago, Englebert said: If you were a juror, would you convict Moore based on the evidence before you? I find it very, very, very difficult to believe that someone in your line of work would fall victim to such blatant manipulation that is readily refuted by even the novice of novices. Let me ask the question another way, if Moore was your client, do you think he would be convicted? Could you muster a convincing defense against such scant and problematic evidence? I think even I could defend someone in his position (with absolutely no formal training). C’mon Bert. You’re better than that - sometimes my BS is better disguised than that. Sometimes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Englebert Posted December 7, 2017 Report Share Posted December 7, 2017 24 minutes ago, TxHoops said: C’mon Bert. You’re better than that - sometimes my BS is better disguised than that. Sometimes What do you mean I'm better than that...exposing BS is what I do. That's like dragging a $100 bill through a trailer park and expecting no one to move a muscle. (I think I recently heard a similar analogy. I think it was dealing with Wild Bill Clinton. Listening to Liberals talk about Roy Moore always leads me to think about ol' Bill.) Am I to assume that your stance on Man-Made Global Warming is just the same BS? After all, both issues have the same amount of supporting evidence that is easily put into question from any novice that actually looks at said evidence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TxHoops Posted December 7, 2017 Report Share Posted December 7, 2017 48 minutes ago, Englebert said: NoWhat do you mean I'm better than that...exposing BS is what I do. That's like dragging a $100 bill through a trailer park and expecting no one to move a muscle. (I think I recently heard a similar analogy. I think it was dealing with Wild Bill Clinton. Listening to Liberals talk about Roy Moore always leads me to think about ol' Bill.) Am I to assume that your stance on Man-Made Global Warming is just the same BS? After all, both issues have the same amount of supporting evidence that is easily put into question from any novice that actually looks at said evidence. Now you’re full of it lmao Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kountzer Posted December 7, 2017 Report Share Posted December 7, 2017 When I was enlisted in the coast guard, we, the cutter (ship) I was on was in the gulf on patrol. We pulled in to Mobile, Al. Stayed there two days. That's the only time I've been in that state. I'm thankful. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Englebert Posted December 7, 2017 Report Share Posted December 7, 2017 43 minutes ago, TxHoops said: Now you’re full of it lmao Yeah, but I was able to get in a shot at Bill and Global Warming Nazis in a discussion about a Republican without getting off topic, and without the cute little word thrown at me. TxHoops 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted December 9, 2017 Report Share Posted December 9, 2017 Handwriting expert touted by the Washington Compost turns on the evil Gloria Allred. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LumRaiderFan Posted December 10, 2017 Report Share Posted December 10, 2017 On 12/7/2017 at 10:06 AM, Kountzer said: When I was enlisted in the coast guard, we, the cutter (ship) I was on was in the gulf on patrol. We pulled in to Mobile, Al. Stayed there two days. That's the only time I've been in that state. I'm thankful. Why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kountzer Posted December 10, 2017 Report Share Posted December 10, 2017 Because i want to be doe doe. Don't worry about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LumRaiderFan Posted December 10, 2017 Report Share Posted December 10, 2017 lol...I’m not. BS Wildcats 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TxHoops Posted December 10, 2017 Report Share Posted December 10, 2017 Which is the more time-honored tradition in Alabama? a. Incest b. Pedophilia c. A combination of both Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TxHoops Posted December 10, 2017 Report Share Posted December 10, 2017 When Roy Moore was 34, was it impolite of him not to bring his 17 yo girlfriend to the prom? This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baddog Posted December 10, 2017 Report Share Posted December 10, 2017 26 minutes ago, TxHoops said: When Roy Moore was 34, was it impolite of him not to bring his 17 yo girlfriend to the prom? This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up TxHoops 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Englebert Posted December 10, 2017 Report Share Posted December 10, 2017 33 minutes ago, TxHoops said: Which is the more time-honored tradition in Alabama? a. Incest b. Pedophilia c. A combination of both Is it back to okay to throw out negative stereotypes...or is it just reserved for minorities? If we open it back up to all people to freely throw out disparaging and baseless stereotypes, this board might get real interesting real fast. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TxHoops Posted December 11, 2017 Report Share Posted December 11, 2017 12 minutes ago, baddog said: This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Interesting. I didn’t know it was 16 there. Although 17 (age of the gf) would meet the age of consent in most states, including our own. Creepy at 34, but not illegal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baddog Posted December 11, 2017 Report Share Posted December 11, 2017 8 minutes ago, TxHoops said: Interesting. I didn’t know it was 16 there. Although 17 (age of the gf) would meet the age of consent in most states, including our own. Creepy at 34, but not illegal. Hollywood is full of couples with huge age differences. It's not even frowned upon. Let a republican get him some young stuff, it's time for the gallows. What a double standard considering how liberal Hollywood is. Sins of the flesh are the most difficult to deny. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TxHoops Posted December 11, 2017 Report Share Posted December 11, 2017 6 minutes ago, baddog said: Hollywood is full of couples with huge age differences. It's not even frowned upon. Let a republican get him some young stuff, it's time for the gallows. What a double standard considering how liberal Hollywood is. Sins of the flesh are the most difficult to deny. I don’t have a problem with big age differences, but let em get out of school please. I wouldn’t care if a 54 yo was dating a 37 yo or even a 27 yo. But the 17 is a bit creepy if true, no? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.