Fun Tool to predict scores

[songone]

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[NDNation]

PNG 42 TC 27

I like.

[NDNation]

Ned 12 Manvel 45

[wo-s#1]

Pretty cool....I plugged in every team I could think of that WOS could face the rest of the way,and we win them all...we'll see

[blackflag]

26 minutes ago, wo-s#1 said:

Pretty cool....I plugged in every team I could think of that WOS could face the rest of the way,and we win them all...we'll see

I noticed that.  It could be.  I don't think the road will be as easy this go round, though.  The semis and finals will tell the story.

[PAT]

Pam 35 Ball 14

[GUNHO]

58 minutes ago, wo-s#1 said:

Pretty cool....I plugged in every team I could think of that WOS could face the rest of the way,and we win them all...we'll see

57 minutes ago, wo-s#1 said:

Pretty cool....I plugged in every team I could think of that WOS could face the rest of the way,and we win them all...we'll see

57 minutes ago, wo-s#1 said:

 

 

[TexazBall]

Pretty cool. Seems like is pretty much stat based cus I did some random schools that I know wouldn't come close to beating the teams I plugged in 

Ex. 2016 Desoto 42 vs 2017 Bishop Lynch (Tapps) 35

That matchup wouldn't be close imo 

[STiger85]

Silsbee 41

Bay City 35

yeah, it alright

[Amphibious Rodent]

Fun to play. It has Newton winning every game as well. I believe this thing may be pretty accurate. But unpredictable things happen in games. Any given Friday Night. Has Newton over Gunter 32-28

[tennisbc]

WOS 27 Newton 20

[Amphibious Rodent]

Glad we don't have to play WOS in playoffs. They are a powerhouse in 4A and we are a powerhouse in 3A. Our good neighbors. Hope they win it all again

[NDNation]

2 hours ago, PAT said:

Pam 35 Ball 14

What did you put in to get PAM to come up? I looked all thru the PORTs and nothing.

[Brubaker]

Last week it had Nederland losing to Porter

[NDNation]

6 minutes ago, Brubaker said:

Last week it had Nederland losing to Porter

It has us beating Nederland 42-28.

[Brubaker]

Maybe they read this board and have a 2-3 TD negative bias factored into their program

[PAT]

1 hour ago, NDNation said:

What did you put in to get PAM to come up? I looked all thru the PORTs and nothing.

Pt Arthur  I had trouble and then figured it out. 

[EAGLEFOREVER]

A little reality about the score predictor 2014 WOS vs Newton, score predictor WOS 28 Newton 14 outcome of actual game WOS 7 Newton 19 so much for it being right. Just to many intangibles in games for it to be trustworthy 

[NDNation]

36 minutes ago, PAT said:

Pt Arthur  I had trouble and then figured it out. 

They can spell out Port Neches Groves, but can't do Port Arthur. SMH.

[NDNation]

PN-G 36 PAM 34

 

[studd88]

3 hours ago, EAGLEFOREVER said:

A little reality about the score predictor 2014 WOS vs Newton, score predictor WOS 28 Newton 14 outcome of actual game WOS 7 Newton 19 so much for it being right. Just to many intangibles in games for it to be trustworthy 

That would be the game you looked up...smh

[EAGLEFOREVER]

1 hour ago, studd88 said:

That would be the game you looked up...smh

Only one that was played and had an actual outcome.

[GATA!]

1 hour ago, studd88 said:

That would be the game you looked up...smh

lol, if it makes you feel better i did WOS/Newton 2017   27-20 wos, ........ill take my crow pickled with a dab of tony's 

[AshlyHasBeen]

I’ve posted the USA Today predictions for the past three years on twitter. Keep in mind the teams are adjusted with every game played. Some of the scores predicted are downright spooky after you look back at the real finals.

[wo-s#1]

You can put same team with different years also,see how this year compares to previous.