Jump to content

Realignment


DannyShapiroBE

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, TradenupBH said:

22-5a will be weaker then what it is now. You lose PAM, possibly Central and Ozen, Livingston. You keep PNG, Ned, Vidor, Baytown Lee, and probably add Dayton, Barbers Hill, and Cleveland. Crosby will most likely be 5a D1. Who knows though how the UIL will do things.

Oh boy Cleveland that 105 Drive is terrible  at night... but I agree with you on it being weaker. 

If Cleveland is in the district I wonder where the number will fall for Splendora? They are a border team kinda like lumberton on 5a div 2 or 4a div 1 right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Matt Stepp projection is correct, Lumberton will be the smallest 5a D2 school in Texas.

His projection for 5a D2 is 1125-1759

Lumberton 1125

Splendora 1145

Cleveland 1446 (growing big time)

New 22-5a could be

Barbers Hill 1560

Nederland 1546

Dayton 1511

PNG 1493

Cleveland 1446

Vidor 1333

Splendora 1145

Lumberton 1125

Baytown Lee ?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TradenupBH said:

If Matt Stepp projection is correct, Lumberton will be the smallest 5a D2 school in Texas.

His projection for 5a D2 is 1125-1759

Lumberton 1125

Splendora 1145

Cleveland 1446 (growing big time)

New 22-5a could be

Barbers Hill 1560

Nederland 1546

Dayton 1511

PNG 1493

Cleveland 1446

Vidor 1333

Splendora 1145

Lumberton 1125

Baytown Lee ?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Well last week I was sure that Central and Ozen would merge.  This week, not so sure.  If they don't 

Baytown Lee 

Barbers Hill 1560

Nederland 1546

Dayton 1511

PN-G 1493

Vidor 1333

Central 1191

Lumberton 1125

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jag Insider said:

Well last week I was sure that Central and Ozen would merge.  This week, not so sure.  If they don't 

Baytown Lee 

Barbers Hill 1560

Nederland 1546

Dayton 1511

PN-G 1493

Vidor 1333

Central 1191

Lumberton 1125

It's going to difficult if Ozen and Central don't combine. The reason being is with Splendora and Cleveland. The UIL has mention that they are pushing for 8 to 9 team districts due to scheduling issues. The north Houston area schools are exploding, so there's not many 5a D2 schools to make a full district. Which means somebody is going to be in a jacked up district. Cleveland, Splendora, BH, Dayton, or Lee might be victims of the split.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TradenupBH said:

It's going to difficult if Ozen and Central don't combine. The reason being is with Splendora and Cleveland. The UIL has mention that they are pushing for 8 to 9 team districts due to scheduling issues. The north Houston area schools are exploding, so there's not many 5a D2 schools to make a full district. Which means somebody is going to be in a jacked up district. Cleveland, Splendora, BH, Dayton, or Lee might be victims of the split.

The new Montgomery school will be 5A D2 and Montgomery will be close to the cutoff. That may be where Splendora/Cleveland may shift towards. Not sure where the rest of the teams will come from though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

This numbers for Central are wrong...

A post from WOSGrad on another thread...

Just got off of the phone with Ronald Jackson, AD of BISD who gave me the following numbers:

West Brook - 2520

Central - 1309

Ozen - 1151

 

That would keep both schools 5A-D2 and remember 21-5A and 22-5A were both 9 team districts this past year..

 

Barbers Hill 1560

Nederland 1546

Dayton 1511

PN-G 1493

Baytown Lee 1414

Vidor 1333

Central 1309

Ozen 1151

Lumberton 1125

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Jag Insider said:

A post from WOSGrad on another thread...

Just got off of the phone with Ronald Jackson, AD of BISD who gave me the following numbers:

West Brook - 2520

Central - 1309

Ozen - 1151

 

That would keep both schools 5A-D2 and remember 21-5A and 22-5A were both 9 team districts this past year..

 

Barbers Hill 1560

Nederland 1546

Dayton 1511

PN-G 1493

Baytown Lee 1414

Vidor 1333

Central 1309

Ozen 1151

Lumberton 1125

But we won't know the cutoff for the classifications  until tomorrow, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, TradenupBH said:

If Matt Stepp projection is correct, Lumberton will be the smallest 5a D2 school in Texas.

His projection for 5a D2 is 1125-1759

Lumberton 1125

Splendora 1145

Cleveland 1446 (growing big time)

New 22-5a could be

Barbers Hill 1560

Nederland 1546

Dayton 1511

PNG 1493

Cleveland 1446

Vidor 1333

Splendora 1145

Lumberton 1125

Baytown Lee ?

 

Class 5A Division I: 1,770 to 2,169

Class 5A Division II: 1,160 to 1,769

Class 4A Division I: 785 to 1,159

Class 4A Division II: 485 to 784

Class 3A Division I: 330 to 484

Class 3A Division II: 230 to 329

Class 2A Division I: 165 to 229

Class 2A Division II: 104.5 to 164

Class 1A Division I: 63 to 104.4

 

these are his numbers you posted the wrong numbers

13 hours ago, TradenupBH said:

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

here are stepp numbers

 

Class 5A Division I: 1,770 to 2,169

Class 5A Division II: 1,160 to 1,769

Class 4A Division I: 785 to 1,159

Class 4A Division II: 485 to 784

Class 3A Division I: 330 to 484

Class 3A Division II: 230 to 329

Class 2A Division I: 165 to 229

Class 2A Division II: 104.5 to 164

Class 1A Division I: 63 to 104.4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, sportsfan2017 said:

here are stepp numbers

 

Class 5A Division I: 1,770 to 2,169

 

Class 5A Division II: 1,160 to 1,769

 

Class 4A Division I: 785 to 1,159

 

Class 4A Division II: 485 to 784

 

Class 3A Division I: 330 to 484

 

Class 3A Division II: 230 to 329

 

Class 2A Division I: 165 to 229

 

Class 2A Division II: 104.5 to 164

 

Class 1A Division I: 63 to 104.4

 

Lumberton and Ozen fans would love the drop to 4A D1.  I could see Lumberton making a good playoff run if that happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jag Insider said:

Lumberton and Ozen fans would love the drop to 4A D1.  I could see Lumberton making a good playoff run if that happened.

No offense...but what exactly are you basing that on?  There's a lot of 4A D1 teams around here that Lumberton couldn't beat.  Haven't been able to recently anyway.  Aren't they normally in a battle with HF every year?  HF couldn't even make the playoffs in D2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, oldschool2 said:

No offense...but what exactly are you basing that on?  There's a lot of 4A D1 teams around here that Lumberton couldn't beat.  Haven't been able to recently anyway.  Aren't they normally in a battle with HF every year?  HF couldn't even make the playoffs in D2.

Exactly 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, oldschool2 said:

No offense...but what exactly are you basing that on?  There's a lot of 4A D1 teams around here that Lumberton couldn't beat.  Haven't been able to recently anyway.  Aren't they normally in a battle with HF every year?  HF couldn't even make the playoffs in D2.

Lumberton had a young team this year, only loosing 7 or 8 starters all together. They should have a few 3 year starters and quite of few 2 year starters next year. With that and hard work they should do well in 4a-D1. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Raiders94 said:

Lumberton had a young team this year, only loosing 7 or 8 starters all together. They should have a few 3 year starters and quite of few 2 year starters next year. With that and hard work they should do well in 4a-D1. 

I'm not saying they wouldn't do better.  That's a given...smaller classification are "worse" and thus easier to compete in compared to classifications above them...that goes without saying.

I'm just saying that the idea of Lumberton making deep runs in the playoffs as a result of dropping in class simply isn't true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Raiders94 said:

Lumberton had a young team this year, only loosing 7 or 8 starters all together. They should have a few 3 year starters and quite of few 2 year starters next year. With that and hard work they should do well in 4a-D1. 

 

2 hours ago, Jag Insider said:

Lumberton and Ozen fans would love the drop to 4A D1.  I could see Lumberton making a good playoff run if that happened.

I would say Lumberton, Ozen and Livingston would all be more competitive in 4A-Division 1, but in no way would it guarantee a playoff spot for any of the 3. The one good thing is they would feel better about scheduling 4A-Division 2 or even 3A-Division 1 schools in Non-District. Might help the appearance of that overall record. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined



  • Posts

    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an easy and obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
    • @CIS_org National Security Senior Fellow @BensmanTodd tells Steve Bannon how the U.S. State Department and USAID have been sending American taxpayer funds to religious nonprofits to facilitate mass immigration to our southern border. Bensman says 248 nonprofits are participating in the United Nations’ 2024 agenda to distribute $1.6 billion in cash, transportation, food, and shelter to U.S.-bound immigrants across Mexico and Latin America.
    • 👍 Oh. I was thinking most thought Wrong Place Wrong Time. Lol. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...