Jump to content

Nederland - UIL


Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, chorizo said:

From what I know,the ad didn’t sign off and they have already had a district meeting which he was denied to play varsity sports,which was no big deal to the family,because it never was a move for sports.

Well, it must be a big deal to the school, because the appealed the decision to the UIL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m not gonna get into that on a public forum,but If it is about the kid that I think,it has nothing to do with playing varsity,it’s all about What’s wrong and what is right.When someone sales a home and buys a new home in a differant city for various reasons a kid shouldn’t be held accountable for a family decision..especially when it is beneficial to the well being of kid!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, chorizo said:

I’m not gonna get into that on a public forum,but If it is about the kid that I think,it has nothing to do with playing varsity,it’s all about What’s wrong and what is right.When someone sales a home and buys a new home in a differant city for various reasons a kid shouldn’t be held accountable for a family decision..especially when it is beneficial to the well being of kid!!

No trying to start a storm of any kind, just curious to see that notice on the UIL agenda. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, chorizo said:

Like I said,not even sure this is about that,but I know of a very nice family that was dealing with a situation,so it could be them!!

Well, regardless if it is about them or not, I hate that coaches have so much power. It is one thing if a kid is still living in your district and just going to a school outside where they live for athletic purposes. But, if a parent decides they need to move their child for whatever reason, and picks up and moves the entire family, then a coach should sign off on the PAPF. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, chorizo said:

Well if it’s him it is strictly about what’s right,because even being cleared he could possibly still be a JV player..

There are two basketball players that have transferred in that have to play JV. One transferred in from out of state, one from a local school district. Not sure which one of these transfers is being appealed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, DannyShapiroBE said:

It's about the player who transferred from Hamshire-Fannett: 

This is the hidden content, please

I was told a kid from another state - not Colorado

Lived here before parents have 2 homes 1 here and 1 there

I don't know if the UIL looks at it like the IRS in that you have to choose a primary residence  (Homestead deductions, etc...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined


  • Posts

    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an easy and obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
    • @CIS_org National Security Senior Fellow @BensmanTodd tells Steve Bannon how the U.S. State Department and USAID have been sending American taxpayer funds to religious nonprofits to facilitate mass immigration to our southern border. Bensman says 248 nonprofits are participating in the United Nations’ 2024 agenda to distribute $1.6 billion in cash, transportation, food, and shelter to U.S.-bound immigrants across Mexico and Latin America.
    • 👍 Oh. I was thinking most thought Wrong Place Wrong Time. Lol. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...