Jump to content

Global Warming Update!


Reagan

Recommended Posts

36 minutes ago, TxHoops said:

These are my favorites - people posting about harsh winters as evidence of lack of global warming.  As effective as an “I don’t understand science” post...  The best part is they’re unwittingly posting evidence arguably in direct opposition of their position.  Gotta love this board :D 

The posts that agree with the Global Warming Nazis scream "I do not follow science. I don't need no stinking evidence to convict Man of killing Earth." Those are the hilarious ones.

Tell me again about the evidence pointing to man as the main contributor to changes in Earth's weather. Oh yeah, there is none.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have already posted a veritable treatise on the subject on this forum, addressing several questions posed.  Said post got no rebuttal (shocker).  Don’t intend on doing it again.  But the ”nuh uh” posts by th tin foil hat-wearing naysayers appears to be equally effective on this board.  So nicely done in that respect.  Interestingly, the “Global Warming Nazis” who sceam “I do not follow science” are known to the scientific community as “scientists”.  Again, perfectly acceptable logic to some who obviously struggle with logic itself...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TxHoops said:

I have already posted a veritable treatise on the subject on this forum, addressing several questions posed.  Said post got no rebuttal (shocker).  Don’t intend on doing it again.  But the ”nuh uh” posts by th tin foil hat-wearing naysayers appears to be equally effective on this board.  So nicely done in that respect.  Interestingly, the “Global Warming Nazis” who sceam “I do not follow science” are known to the scientific community as “scientists”.  Again, perfectly acceptable logic to some who obviously struggle with logic itself...

Your earlier post contained zero evidence of man's involvement in changing temperatures. You posted a lot of links claiming that Earth's temperatures are changing, then basically said you have to be a moron not to believe Man was the cause. The post was so trite and full of untruths, half-truths, and far-out  "assumptions" that I actually forgot about it. Again, it showed zero evidence of man's contribution, which is exactly what I referenced as the main point of focus. Your post also showed zero empirical evidence of the effects of Earth's ever changing temperatures...just of lot of conjecture from ones with zero credibility on the subject. In fact, nowhere in your post did anything address what is probably the main cause of Earth's temperatures...solar involvement, moon's variations in gravitational tug, variations in Earth's orbit, and/or Earth's uneven wobbles along its axis. No person with any sense of dignity would conclude that Man is the source of ever changing climate without including/discounting these factors in their research. And no one worth their salt should fall victim to those who discount these factors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Englebert said:

Your earlier post contained zero evidence of man's involvement in changing temperatures. You posted a lot of links claiming that Earth's temperatures are changing, then basically said you have to be a moron not to believe Man was the cause. The post was so trite and full of untruths, half-truths, and far-out  "assumptions" that I actually forgot about it. Again, it showed zero evidence of man's contribution, which is exactly what I referenced as the main point of focus. Your post also showed zero empirical evidence of the effects of Earth's ever changing temperatures...just of lot of conjecture from ones with zero credibility on the subject. In fact, nowhere in your post did anything address what is probably the main cause of Earth's temperatures...solar involvement, moon's variations in gravitational tug, variations in Earth's orbit, and/or Earth's uneven wobbles along its axis. No person with any sense of dignity would conclude that Man is the source of ever changing climate without including/discounting these factors in their research. And no one worth their salt should fall victim to those who discount these factors.

Translation:  nuh uh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On December 10, 2017 at 5:58 PM, TxHoops said:

I have already posted a veritable treatise on the subject on this forum, addressing several questions posed.  Said post got no rebuttal (shocker).  Don’t intend on doing it again.  But the ”nuh uh” posts by th tin foil hat-wearing naysayers appears to be equally effective on this board.  So nicely done in that respect.  Interestingly, the “Global Warming Nazis” who sceam “I do not follow science” are known to the scientific community as “scientists”.  Again, perfectly acceptable logic to some who obviously struggle with logic itself...

I give credence to scientists , when they are paid to research, not paid to validate someone's preconceived agenda.  And I don't appreciate your derogatory comment about my tin foil hat.  Durn thing works.  Aliens haven't contacted me since I put it on. :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Kountzer said:

I believe there is global warming.  I also believe the issue is being exploited to set up a new world order.  

The main question is not whether there is warming (or changing) weather...the main question is who is causing it, and is it detrimental to Earth's ability to sustain life. The topic of whether the Earth's climate is currently in a drastic change can be debated until the cows come home, but one thing is undeniable, we have no clue as to the magnitude or culprit or effect of this supposed change.

And I somewhat agree with your last statement. I have zero doubt that the government is using the topic in an effort to control the people. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Englebert said:

The main question is not whether there is warming (or changing) weather...the main question is who is causing it, and is it detrimental to Earth's ability to sustain life. The topic of whether the Earth's climate is currently in a drastic change can be debated until the cows come home, but one thing is undeniable, we have no clue as to the magnitude or culprit or effect of this supposed change.

And I somewhat agree with your last statement. I have zero doubt that the government is using the topic in an effort to control the people. 

I don't think it's a coincidence that the folks that believe in :"man made" global warming are the same folks that are considered socialist ( AlGore, Clinton, obama, Moonbeam Brown, ect) that wants to control your behavior in just about everything.  I always thought it's interesting that these same socialist think they know what's better for me than I do!  Capitalism:  I control me.  Socialism:  Somebody else controls me.  Which is more evil?    Again --  the bottom line:  It gets hotter when the Sun is more active.  It gets cooler when the Sun is less active.   Not rocket science!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

French President Charon (and CBS News) worried about Global Warming.  Please tell me Mr. Charon, how many people have died of Global Warming in France between 1/2015 & 6/2016?  I can't say, but I'll take a wild guess - None - Nada.  

This is the hidden content, please

In that same period, over 230 have been killed by terrorists.  So perhaps that's Europe's new answer to solving MMGW.  Let these third or fourth world immigrants take over your continent and once you're all living in mud houses or grass huts, you won't need no stinking electricity or cars.  And you'll be free to attend the Mosque of your choice, or die.  My quandary is whether to laugh or cry at Europe's stupidity.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this link perfectly illustrates the mentality of the Man-Made Global Warming Nazis:

This is the hidden content, please

Here's a picture of a starving bear. Conclusion: Man's fault.

One example I've used (and maybe overused) when describing the thought processes of these nazis matches this fairly congruently. Global Warming nazis will see a pile of deer bones in the woods, and automatically (and positively) state: A man must have shot him.

Anyone with more than two functioning brain cells should be able to realize that one picture of a starving bear does not show evidence of a shrinking habitat. There are plenty of other reasons, some very more logical than Man-Made Global Warming, for seeing a starving bear. Think Occam's razor. And even if Global Warming is the cause, how does this point to Man instead of the Sun (or plenty of other hypotheses)? I've pretty much come to the conclusion that Man-Made Global Warming Nazi logic is simply illogical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On December 12, 2017 at 3:22 AM, Kountzer said:

I believe there is global warming.  I also believe the issue is being exploited to set up a new world order.  

I remember many years ago hearing about the New World Order, and at that time, was very skeptical.  I'm now convinced.  I'm also convinced that some (many?) Repubs politicians are in on it, and all the Democratic Polticians.  To be fair, some of both parties may not believe in it, but are actually helping under the guise of following party lines.  I suspect that the Bildeberg group is involved, and 99.99% sure Soros is one of their proponents.  He may be a pawn of theirs, because this isn't so much about money as it is power.  The Rothschild's have both.  I have neither.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/14/2017 at 1:25 PM, REBgp said:

I remember many years ago hearing about the New World Order, and at that time, was very skeptical.  I'm now convinced.  I'm also convinced that some (many?) Repubs politicians are in on it, and all the Democratic Polticians.  To be fair, some of both parties may not believe in it, but are actually helping under the guise of following party lines.  I suspect that the Bildeberg group is involved, and 99.99% sure Soros is one of their proponents.  He may be a pawn of theirs, because this isn't so much about money as it is power.  The Rothschild's have both.  I have neither.

ok

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,207
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined



  • Posts

    • That should tell everyone something pretty clearly. Does anyone really think BH is recruiting elementary kids, to get them to transfer in Jr. high? Seriously? Here is the "dirty little secret" about BH: Most people move to the district for a quality living environment to raise their young family, and benefit from the outstanding acedemics at BH. Even If all athlectics suddenly disappeared from BH, people would still want their kids in the district. If thats not enough to convince anyone, and BH really was determined to recruit, first step would be to have open enrollemnt. It is closed.        Yes, I get it, no one ever wants to give BH the benefit of the doubt on anything. Some of the accusations are beyond ridiculous though. This paranoia the BH critics are afflicted with is not just sad, its flat out laughable.     
    • Opting is always an option. Are they considering any BC assistants? Highly qualified after that season they put up. 
    • Be that as it may, only time will tell. Hide and watch. Don’t be surprised if the next HC hire uses his own recipe. That happens more than not historically. I am not arguing the point that Hooks & CT had a winning combination that could’ve been carried over. I’m saying that finding someone to do that is not going to be as easy as one might think. Tell me again why Saban’s replacement, who even has Saban’s assistance if he wants it, just lost another game to an unranked team and has taken the Tide out of playoff contention? Why wouldn’t he just follow the success of possibly the greatest college football coach ever lived? 
    • We've acknowledged having 2 HOF coaches hasn't been like most other schools. So why everyone jumps to the conclusion it wouldn't work here is beyond my comprehension. I see it carry over with these other hires. Gilmer, Aledo, North Shore, Austin Westlake. Next man up that continues the system in place has instant success. Matter fact there was 2 rookie HC that won the state championship the same year we handed over the keys. Same book. Same recipe. Better ingredients.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...