BS Wildcats Posted December 31, 2017 Report Share Posted December 31, 2017 1 hour ago, PhatMack19 said: When Gore ran for President in 2000 his Net Worth was between $700k-$1.6mil. Just 17 short years later Al Gore is worth an estimated $300 million. Global warming has been very good to that man. Big girl, new tobie, and the associates should be in a furor over him amassing that much wealth, since in a socialist society they want, no one should be that rich. 77 and Reagan 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted December 31, 2017 Author Report Share Posted December 31, 2017 Cold records smashed! This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhatMack19 Posted December 31, 2017 Report Share Posted December 31, 2017 2 hours ago, BS Wildcats said: Big girl, new tobie, and the associates should be in a furor over him amassing that much wealth, since in a socialist society they want, no one should be that rich. I will admit that my Net Worth has also increased by 300x during that same time, but I was in college in 2000 and was worth around 27 bucks and some change. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kountzer Posted January 1, 2018 Report Share Posted January 1, 2018 I wish I could be there when you all figure out what it is really all about. Meanwhile have to settle for watching your stumble around in the dark. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted January 1, 2018 Author Report Share Posted January 1, 2018 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted January 2, 2018 Author Report Share Posted January 2, 2018 Again -- good thing there's Global warming. Because it would REALLY be cold! This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LumRaiderFan Posted January 2, 2018 Report Share Posted January 2, 2018 On 1/1/2018 at 8:59 PM, Kountzer said: I wish I could be there when you all figure out what it is really all about. Meanwhile have to settle for watching your stumble around in the dark. Please take us out of the darkness...what is it really all about? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kountzer Posted January 2, 2018 Report Share Posted January 2, 2018 I've been saying all along. No need to repeat it. You didn't care to pay attention then, I doubt if you will now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS Wildcats Posted January 2, 2018 Report Share Posted January 2, 2018 1 hour ago, LumRaiderFan said: Please take us out of the darkness...what is it really all about? I'm pretty sure he is talking about a new world order, or one world government. This will happen, maybe not in our lifetime, but it is coming. And, the UN will be firmly behind it. Hagar 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LumRaiderFan Posted January 2, 2018 Report Share Posted January 2, 2018 7 minutes ago, BS Wildcats said: I'm pretty sure he is talking about a new world order, or one world government. This will happen, maybe not in our lifetime, but it is coming. And, the UN will be firmly behind it. I get it...I'm just pushing buttons. I just get a kick out of Kountzer thinking no one has the answers but him. By the way, I don't think anyone has any idea how global politics will play out in the future or how soon it will take place. TxHoops 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted January 2, 2018 Report Share Posted January 2, 2018 45 minutes ago, Kountzer said: I've been saying all along. No need to repeat it. You didn't care to pay attention then, I doubt if you will now. Why is it that only you have the answers? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TxHoops Posted January 3, 2018 Report Share Posted January 3, 2018 9 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said: I get it...I'm just pushing buttons. I just get a kick out of Kountzer thinking no one has the answers but him. By the way, I don't think anyone has any idea how global politics will play out in the future or how soon it will take place. My guy has been to bible study (By the way, i think it’s hilariously ironic that we can agree that one thing we do know, is that we don’t know!) LumRaiderFan and Hagar 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Englebert Posted January 3, 2018 Report Share Posted January 3, 2018 1 hour ago, TxHoops said: My guy has been to bible study (By the way, i think it’s hilariously ironic that we can agree that one thing we do know, is that we don’t know!) It sure is ironic. This is the whole philosophy of the so-called and hilariously labeled "deniers". Too bad this philosophy is taken to heart instead of the worshipping at the feet of those who proclaim "the debate is over". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhatMack19 Posted January 3, 2018 Report Share Posted January 3, 2018 What the hell is a Bomb Cyclone? Al Gore is full of crap. We have frozen hurricanes about to hit to the east coast and I’m not talking about the drink. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hagar Posted January 3, 2018 Report Share Posted January 3, 2018 2 hours ago, PhatMack19 said: What the hell is a Bomb Cyclone? Al Gore is full of crap. We have frozen hurricanes about to hit to the east coast and I’m not talking about the drink. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Al Gore is the most prominent Flim-Flam man in history (except L. Ron Hubbard). What a lick. I love the way Greg Bostwick rolls his eyes when they start talking Polar Vortex. Imo, The Weather Channel could hire Greg and fire all their prognosticators. Been watching him since he was a pup. Best in the business for my money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted January 3, 2018 Report Share Posted January 3, 2018 I notice that, quite often, the word "science" is used as a suggestion that there is no question about the global warming debate. That same "science", for years, had alleged that vitamin supplements were beneficial. I know many people for whom Vitamin D was prescribed by a physician ( based upon "scientific evidence")to help address the bone loss issue as a result of advancing age. If anyone has noticed, in the last few days, "science" has stated that there is no benefit in taking these supplements Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted January 3, 2018 Author Report Share Posted January 3, 2018 We are in a La Nina. Mother nature controls this NOT humans! This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted January 3, 2018 Author Report Share Posted January 3, 2018 1 hour ago, stevenash said: I notice that, quite often, the word "science" is used as a suggestion that there is no question about the global warming debate. That same "science", for years, had alleged that vitamin supplements were beneficial. I know many people for whom Vitamin D was prescribed by a physician ( based upon "scientific evidence")to help address the bone loss issue as a result of advancing age. If anyone has noticed, in the last few days, "science" has stated that there is no benefit in taking these supplements This "science" is usually funded by drug companies. So... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted January 3, 2018 Report Share Posted January 3, 2018 My point was the FACT that science sometimes discovers that its "evidence" is incorrect. Therefore, attaching the word scientific ( favorite of global warming purveyors)to an explanation does not necessarily confirm indisputable accuracy. Reagan 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted January 3, 2018 Author Report Share Posted January 3, 2018 26 minutes ago, stevenash said: My point was the FACT that science sometimes discovers that its "evidence" is incorrect. Therefore, attaching the word scientific ( favorite of global warming purveyors)to an explanation does not necessarily confirm indisputable accuracy. True! And my fact would also be "follow the money!" AlGore made a lot of money on this global warming scam. 77 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
77 Posted January 3, 2018 Report Share Posted January 3, 2018 why else would all the liberal politicians want to keep giving our tax dollars to that global warming scam, just another money laundering scheme! baddog 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baddog Posted January 4, 2018 Report Share Posted January 4, 2018 17 hours ago, PhatMack19 said: What the hell is a Bomb Cyclone? Al Gore is full of crap. We have frozen hurricanes about to hit to the east coast and I’m not talking about the drink. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Best I can do.... This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kountzer Posted January 4, 2018 Report Share Posted January 4, 2018 22 hours ago, TxHoops said: My guy has been to bible study (By the way, i think it’s hilariously ironic that we can agree that one thing we do know, is that we don’t know!) rev 13 16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: 17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TxHoops Posted January 4, 2018 Report Share Posted January 4, 2018 21 minutes ago, Kountzer said: rev 13 16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: 17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. We were talking Matthew 24:36 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kountzer Posted January 4, 2018 Report Share Posted January 4, 2018 58 minutes ago, TxHoops said: We were talking Matthew 24:36 Matt 16: 2, 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.