Jump to content

Global Warming Update!

Reagan

By Reagan
in Political Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 583
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

NetCat
NetCat

Their stain on the RR tracks 😂 What morons

Ty Cobb
Ty Cobb

Just finished watching Shawshank. Been going back and forth between it and Yellowstone.

Hagar
Hagar

I give credence to scientists , when they are paid to research, not paid to validate someone's preconceived agenda.  And I don't appreciate your derogatory comment about my tin foil hat.  Durn thing w

Posted Images

Hagar

Hagar

Posted
Posted

This is the hidden content, please

Talking about a "no lose scenario".  The global warning whacko's (and this is whacko doublespeak) have got all the bases covered.  This is a win-win.  A fine a display of liberal logic as you'll ever find.  Once again the English language is inadequate to describe how asinine this assertion is.  And if you don't see that as a conundrum, try to explain how these same whacko's want to denigrate global warming deniers.  Best analogy I can think of is a extremely mentally ill man in a straitjacket, in a padded cell telling me how insane I am.  Smdh

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 3 months later...
  • 3 months later...
Hagar

Hagar

Posted
Posted
On 10/8/2018 at 0:16 PM, LumRaiderFan said:

This is the hidden content, please

YIKES!

:)

This is a big deal.  Big news story on the MSM.  I only have one question.  Twelve years from now, when there has been no change, will there be a big retraction?  Will they report how wrong they were?  Remember, according to Al Gore, the waves from the Atlantic Ocean should be crashing at the foot of the Appalachian Mountain Range, and all of us in SETX should be homeless on the streets of Oklahoma City.  Yes, I’m exaggerating somewhat, but in jest.  These GWF (Global Warming Fanatics) are serious.  They do an injustice to any serious research, or actual threat of Global warming.  They are the equivalent of the boy who cried wolf.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
Reagan

Reagan

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I just heard that the Sun spot activity is low and that's the reason for the extra cold weather.  Well, kind of what I've been saying -- it's ALL about the Sun!  It's amazing how some people think they are smart enough to be able to control the weather.  Also, though, notice what side of the isle they are on:  The Liberal/Socialist side!  These are the same ones that wants to control just about everything you do.  Because, you know, they are smarter than the average Bear!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UT alum

UT alum

Posted
Posted
On 3/22/2018 at 10:01 AM, Hagar said:

I can't verify this story, but if it's true, Science doesn't get any worse than this.

This is the hidden content, please

Can you people quote anything other than Fox News or Breitbart?

I know it’s deep state, but I trust NOAA for scientific evidence. You think man has no impact on atmosphere hence climate?

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

Deny at our descendants’ peril.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Englebert

Englebert

Posted
Posted
32 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Can you people quote anything other than Fox News or Breitbart?

I know it’s deep state, but I trust NOAA for scientific evidence. You think man has no impact on atmosphere hence climate?

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

Deny at our descendants’ peril.

NOAA has be caught multiple times altering data. Even the most blind should not trust them at all.

According to NOAA, in a 1972 Time magazine published article, they claimed the Earth's temperature had fallen 2.7 degrees in the past 3 decades. Then mysteriously, using altered data, they now claim the Earth's temperature has risen (calculations based on the same data from the same time period). And you trust them why?

If you want a Man-made global warming discussion, answer two questions, or even one of them. The theory is that the Earth is warming, this warming's major contributor is Man, and this warming is detrimental to Earth's health. Show evidence of Man's contribution to the theorized warming, and/or show evidence that this theorized warming is detrimental to Earth's health . (This will be a very short discussion.) I'm particularly interested how other possible contributors are discounted, especially solar and lunar influences.

We can discuss the assumptions of the rationale behind the Man-made Global warming theory, but let's just identify the problem first.

Blindly follow at the peril of your own freedom...and wallet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LumRaiderFan

LumRaiderFan

Posted
Posted
31 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Can you people quote anything other than Fox News or Breitbart?

I know it’s deep state, but I trust NOAA for scientific evidence. You think man has no impact on atmosphere hence climate?

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

Deny at our descendants’ peril.

Al Gore loves folks like you...you’ve made him rich beyond his wildest dreams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UT alum

UT alum

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, Englebert said:

NOAA has be caught multiple times altering data. Even the most blind should not trust them at all.

According to NOAA, in a 1972 Time magazine published article, they claimed the Earth's temperature had fallen 2.7 degrees in the past 3 decades. Then mysteriously, using altered data, they now claim the Earth's temperature has risen (calculations based on the same data from the same time period). And you trust them why?

If you want a Man-made global warming discussion, answer two questions, or even one of them. The theory is that the Earth is warming, this warming's major contributor is Man, and this warming is detrimental to Earth's health. Show evidence of Man's contribution to the theorized warming, and/or show evidence that this theorized warming is detrimental to Earth's health . (This will be a very short discussion.) I'm particularly interested how other possible contributors are discounted, especially solar and lunar influences.

We can discuss the assumptions of the rationale behind the Man-made Global warming theory, but let's just identify the problem first.

Blindly follow at the peril of your own freedom...and wallet.

I’m not a scientist, but I side with the 95% of professionally trained who believe it.

You’re doing just what Russia wants - distrusting our government and other institutions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    46,202
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    CHSFalcon
    Newest Member
    CHSFalcon
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...