Jump to content

Global Warming Update!

Reagan

By Reagan
in Political Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

TxHoops

TxHoops

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Tigers2010 said:

Okay how about this:

Global Warming is a natural process that has occurred over the course of Earth's history. 

The advancement of Man has sped up the process to some degree, but that, in itself, is also a natural part of life.

Stop bringing logic into this discussion! ;) 

  • Replies 583
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

NetCat
NetCat

Their stain on the RR tracks 😂 What morons

Ty Cobb
Ty Cobb

Just finished watching Shawshank. Been going back and forth between it and Yellowstone.

Hagar
Hagar

I give credence to scientists , when they are paid to research, not paid to validate someone's preconceived agenda.  And I don't appreciate your derogatory comment about my tin foil hat.  Durn thing w

Posted Images

Englebert

Englebert

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, Tigers2010 said:

Okay how about this:

Global Warming is a natural process that has occurred over the course of Earth's history. 

The advancement of Man has sped up the process to some degree, but that, in itself, is also a natural part of life.

Should we spend trillions of dollars trying to reverse or even change a natural part of life? If so, would these trillions spent make one iota of a difference? Should we study the cause and effect of such efforts before throwing money at a theorized solution to a problem that is not even defined? Oh wait, I can't ask these questions. The science is settled and I should just hand over my wallet and go live with the Amish.

LumRaiderFan

LumRaiderFan

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Englebert said:

Should we spend trillions of dollars trying to reverse or even change a natural part of life? If so, would these trillions spent make one iota of a difference? Should we study the cause and effect of such efforts before throwing money at a theorized solution to a problem that is not even defined? Oh wait, I can't ask these questions. The science is settled and I should just hand over my wallet and go live with the Amish.

There it is...that's all us deniers have be saying for years.

That, my MMGW supporters, would be science.

Tigers2010

Tigers2010

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Englebert said:

Should we spend trillions of dollars trying to reverse or even change a natural part of life? If so, would these trillions spent make one iota of a difference? Should we study the cause and effect of such efforts before throwing money at a theorized solution to a problem that is not even defined? Oh wait, I can't ask these questions. The science is settled and I should just hand over my wallet and go live with the Amish.

For me, no. I would let some nerdy guy in a white short sleeved button up sit in a room and figure it out. I would give him a chinese food take out voucher per day and let him dig in. Maybe once a year fly him to the North Pole and check on things. But no, I would not be for dropping a Trilly on this thing.

Englebert

Englebert

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, Tigers2010 said:

For me, no. I would let some nerdy guy in a white short sleeved button up sit in a room and figure it out. I would give him a chinese food take out voucher per day and let him dig in. Maybe once a year fly him to the North Pole and check on things. But no, I would not be for dropping a Trilly on this thing.

I think that is what most of us "deniers" are saying. Let's figure this thing out before committing a whole lot of money that might or might not be useful. The problem is when we say things like this, we get labeled with all kinds of cute little words that are in no way flattering. In fact, some are trying to make us into criminals just for asking obvious questions. I have read many stories of people losing their job for having the audacity to simply question the MMGW theory. Skepticism is the driving force of science, but the MMGW nazis want to stifle any modicum of perceived dissent, and simple little questions definitely qualify in their minds.

Tigers2010

Tigers2010

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Englebert said:

I think that is what most of us "deniers" are saying. Let's figure this thing out before committing a whole lot of money that might or might not be useful. The problem is when we say things like this, we get labeled with all kinds of cute little words that are in no way flattering. In fact, some are trying to make us into criminals just for asking obvious questions. I have read many stories of people losing their job for having the audacity to simply question the MMGW theory. Skepticism is the driving force of science, but the MMGW nazis want to stifle any modicum of perceived dissent, and simple little questions definitely qualify in their minds.

Part of it is our communication with each other. We gotta stop letting it get contentious and even personal. We gotta find common ground and go from there. Not just on this topic, but on almost all of the ones on this board. BigGirl and that group do the same, but we gotta do better at communicating as well, or nothing gets done. 

TxHoops

TxHoops

Posted
Posted
58 minutes ago, Tigers2010 said:

I have tried, oh have I tried. You two are like my two boys (Aggie vs Longhorn) at freaking Thanksgiving. (when they still played).

 

55 minutes ago, Englebert said:

Who is the Aggie? Don't you dare put that moniker on me. :)

Agreed.  I may disagree with Eng on some issues, such as this one, but he doesn’t deserve that!

 

TxHoops

TxHoops

Posted
Posted

Smh.  Poor Reagan/Smitty.  Thanks again for unintentionally posting data that means the exact opposite of what you think it does.  

Don’t feel bad though.  Ms. Prestigiacomo apparently has a job writing and she has no clue either.  This is the stuff of FB and social media that gives me a good laugh every time the temperature drops.  

Englebert

Englebert

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, TxHoops said:

Here you go pal.  Some light reading so you won’t fall for the dumbarsery they publish on daily wire.  

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

 

The Man-Made Global Warming nazis have managed to convince people you can have your cake and eat it too.

It's too hot outside - Man-Made Global Warming

It's too cold outside - Man-Made Global Warming

It's a very mild winter - Man-Made Global Warming

It's a very harsh winter - Man-Made Global Warming

The hurricane season was almost as bad as the 1930s - Man-Made Global Warming

Hillary lost the election - Man-Made Global Warming

Does that about sum it up?

Englebert

Englebert

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, TxHoops said:

Smh.  Poor Reagan/Smitty.  Thanks again for unintentionally posting data that means the exact opposite of what you think it does.  

Don’t feel bad though.  Ms. Prestigiacomo apparently has a job writing and she has no clue either.  This is the stuff of FB and social media that gives me a good laugh every time the temperature drops.  

Do you get the same gut-wrenching chuckles every time you read some Man-Made Global Warming nazi writing about Polar bears starving due to MMGW? What about the nutcases that attribute every weather pattern to MMGW? What about every photo of Earth's ever changing scenery attributed to MMGW? There are many more instances of these, which should keep you in stitches for the rest of your life.

Hagar

Hagar

Posted
Posted

I recently saw a documentary (on NGO I think) about Antarctica.  On one side of the continent they showed massive chunks of ice falling into the ocean.  But they also said on another side, the ice was building up at about the same rate.  If we could get the scientists off the OWGovt. Teat attempting to prove a preconceived OWG conviction, maybe they could try to ascertain if perhaps the earth has wobbled off its axis, which, I'm guessing, would affect the weather.  It would also explain why my G'son is not making 100% of his threes :) 

Englebert

Englebert

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, TxHoops said:

My bad Eng.  I’m in a bad mood this morning lol

I'm in a pretty good mood after last night's game. It would have been a lot sweeter if the opponent would have been one of the other former Big12 teams (and I'm not referring to Nebraska or Colorado).  Too bad the SEC is too scared to even dare allow that matchup. If you don't feel like "debating" right now, this post should get PhatMack on the warpath. Oh wait, this is the political forum...he and I are on the same side. I'm not venturing to the College section. Y'all are brutal over there.

TxHoops

TxHoops

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Englebert said:

I'm in a pretty good mood after last night's game. It would have been a lot sweeter if the opponent would have been one of the other former Big12 teams (and I'm not referring to Nebraska or Colorado).  Too bad the SEC is too scared to even dare allow that matchup. If you don't feel like "debating" right now, this post should get PhatMack on the warpath. Oh wait, this is the political forum...he and I are on the same side. I'm not venturing to the College section. Y'all are brutal over there.

I was elated as well pal.   I like you on both boards but for some reason a smidge more over there.  And I’m much more passionate about college athletics than politics.  Yes, I’m part of the problem :D 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    46,282
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Unknown472929300
    Newest Member
    Unknown472929300
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...