NFL/NBC are Liars

[baddog]

Good read. Tobie, get a load of this!

What if NBC and the NFL had the guts to be honest about anthem protests at the Super Bowl?

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[Ty Cobb]

I assure you the nfl has no guts!

[Kountzer]

The NFL puts up with a team being named the Washington Redskins. So, what goes around comes back around.

[baddog]

26 minutes ago, Kountzer said:

The NFL puts up with a team being named the Washington Redskins. So, what goes around comes back around.

Really, the way they played this year, they should be called the Squaws.

Is that all you got?

[Englebert]

30 minutes ago, Kountzer said:

The NFL puts up with a team being named the Washington Redskins. So, what goes around comes back around.

Why would the NFL ban a name that doesn't seem to offend the very people it is named after:

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

I could see them banning the name if ratings start dropping because of it, but that hasn't been the case.

[Kountzer]

1 hour ago, baddog said:

Really, the way they played this year, they should be called the Squaws.

Is that all you got?

No that is not all I got.  Everything around here is a comeback outback.  That is how I feel about it though.  You can categorize it anyway you want.

[baddog]

21 minutes ago, Kountzer said:

No that is not all I got.  Everything around here is a comeback outback.  That is how I feel about it though.  You can categorize it anyway you want.

Your response had absolutely nothing to do with why NBC is lying about showing the kneeling players due to it be a live event. 

Btw, what is offensive about calling an Indian a Redskin when I am referred to as a white guy? Should I get my panties wadded?

[BS Wildcats]

16 minutes ago, baddog said:

Your response had absolutely nothing to do with why NBC is lying about showing the kneeling players due to it be a live event. 

Btw, what is offensive about calling an Indian a Redskin when I am referred to as a white guy? Should I get my panties wadded?

Honkey

[Kountzer]

That's okay.  The USA won't be here always.  Enjoy your hegemony while it lasts.

[Ty Cobb]

I wish there was a team called the “Whiteskins or Peachskins” so the claims of racism would stop. The Washington Whiteskins or the Portland Peachskins sounds good. Actually, that wouldn’t work either. Then idiots would claim that as racist because it’s named after white people.

[Kountzer]

There will be no NFL in heaven, no white supremacy either.   All that stuff you're clinging to is temporary.

[Englebert]

51 minutes ago, Kountzer said:

There will be no NFL in heaven, no white supremacy either.   All that stuff you're clinging to is temporary.

Do you actually believe that Ty Cobb's post above is advocating for White supremacy like you seem to claim?

[Hagar]

Since a sports teams name is usually something ferocious and brave, I'd bet you if you took a vote of every Native American the majority would say they're okay, actually proud, with the team named the Washington Redskins.  The fact that the Seminole Indians have given Florida State permission to use their name should be proof enough.  And I'd ask the question, why should it be offensive in this context?  I'm proud of the Houston Texans, because I'm a Texan (although they had so many injuries this year, ferocious is a little far fetched lol).  If I thought the majority of Native Americans were offended by it, yes change the name.  But they know their ancestors were ferocious and brave, ergo the pride.  I see it as a typical leftist power play, for nothing more than to disrupt a popular facet of American life, just as the kneeling is.  And the players involved don't realize they're Pawns in this, nor do they realize they're killing the Golden Goose.  What sad morons.

[Kountzer]

14 minutes ago, REBgp said:

Since a sports teams name is usually something ferocious and brave, I'd bet you if you took a vote of every Native American the majority would say they're okay, actually proud, with the team named the Washington Redskins.  The fact that the Seminole Indians have given Florida State permission to use their name should be proof enough.  And I'd ask the question, why should it be offensive in this context?  I'm proud of the Houston Texans, because I'm a Texan (although they had so many injuries this year, ferocious is a little far fetched lol).  If I thought the majority of Native Americans were offended by it, yes change the name.  But they know their ancestors were ferocious and brave, ergo the pride.  I see it as a typical leftist power play, for nothing more than to disrupt a popular facet of American life, just as the kneeling is.  And the players involved don't realize they're Pawns in this, nor do they realize they're killing the Golden Goose.  What sad morons.

A few don't care for the name redskins.  Most of them don't.  Being called a Texan & being called a 'redskin' are two different things.

[Kountzer]

6 hours ago, Englebert said:

Do you actually believe that Ty Cobb's post above is advocating for White supremacy like you seem to claim?

Being indifferent to the name redskin is, most definitely.  

[Hagar]

10 minutes ago, Kountzer said:

A few don't care for the name redskins.  Most of them don't.  Being called a Texan & being called a 'redskin' are two different things.

But in my post, I made a point to say, imo, the majority of Native Americans would approve of it in that context.  If they voted on it and didn't, fine, change the name.  Point is, let the majority of NA decide, not a few activists who want their 15 minutes.

[Kountzer]

Even if they voted against the name the nfl would keep the name.  Why?  White supremacy.

[Ty Cobb]

Are you an Indian? Does the redskin/seminole/brave/black hawk name affend you? If so, why?

[baddog]

11 hours ago, BS Wildcats said:

Honkey

Hey, I resemble that remark.

[baddog]

1 hour ago, Kountzer said:

Even if they voted against the name the nfl would keep the name.  Why?  White supremacy.

In a democratic society where the majority race is white, you will have white supremacy.....no getting around it. Don't act like the minority voice hasn't been heard. If you don't like it here, try Africa, the only continent where you will experience your beloved black supremacy. Let me know the name of any of their professional football teams. That could get interesting.

[baddog]

Kountzer, what we have here is a liberal TV network that this year has the rights to broadcast the most watched single sporting event in the history of the world. They are saying that they will show the oppressed kneelers because it is a live event and is what is happening at that moment. Since the Superbowl is one of the most choreographed shows, this is a lie. Liberal media is dead set on bringing down this country and are showing the rest of the world just how bad it is for our black population here so that so that we appear evil and our blacks are somehow enslaved. What should happen is that when the kneelers are on camera, a box should appear above their individual heads showing the house they live in. I bet NBC wouldn't care to show that because it doesn't fit their narrative. That's what this thread is about, not the Redskins. 

Funny, I know a black man who is a Redskins fan. Doesn't bother him in the least. Seems like that should be a conflict of interest, but he doesn't wear panties.

[Kountzer]

29 minutes ago, baddog said:

In a democratic society where the majority race is white, you will have white supremacy.....no getting around it. Don't act like the minority voice hasn't been heard. If you don't like it here, try Africa, the only continent where you will experience your beloved black supremacy. Let me know the name of any of their professional football teams. That could get interesting.

I was born here.  I'm not going anywhere.   If it weren't for blacks there would be no pro football.  That's why the one's that kneel get away with it.  It is stupid though.  Smash your brains in to entertain people who don't like you.

[baddog]

8 minutes ago, Kountzer said:

I was born here.  I'm not going anywhere.   If it weren't for blacks there would be no pro football.  That's why the one's that kneel get away with it.  It is stupid though.  Smash your brains in to entertain people who don't like you.

What a racist statement. Another in a long line of two-faced liberals. There was pro football before blacks played. Those were real men.

Don't care where you were born. If you are not satisfied with the best country in the world, try a third world country and let me know how oppressed you feel. Talk about stupid!!!!

[Kountzer]

Who said anything about black supremacy?  You did.  Who said anything about not being satisfied with this country?  You did.  Quit sliming me with old stereotypes.  Come up with something new.

[baddog]

4 minutes ago, Kountzer said:

Who said anything about black supremacy?  You did.  Who said anything about not being satisfied with this country?  You did.  Quit sliming me with old stereotypes.  Come up with something new.

Not so. You mentioned white supremacy. I said if that is what you are dissatisfied with try a black supreme African country......where else? Your football statement was loaded with black supremacy being that blacks are the only reason it exists. Not true. You are stereotyping yourself. I just simply counter.