Jump to content

Tentative Non-District Schedules


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

Hmmmmmm....  *crickets*

 

17 hours ago, Bulldogs92 said:

Agreed. I usually can get behind most of what Jasper ISD decides to do, but this issue with us not scheduling Silsbee or WOS really is disturbing. Jasper needs to step up and work this out. 

Bulldog 92 come to the Booster meeting and get informed on what is going on,West Orange is on the schedule this year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, WOSgrad said:

West Hardin:

Wk1: Acadiana

Wk2: Hull-Daisetta

Wk3 - Warren

Wk4 - Mount Enterprise

 

Nederland (per IC Murrell at PA News):

Wk 1 - WO-S

Wk 2 - Central/Ozen

Wk 3 - Silsbee

 

Barbers Hill:

Magnolia

Montgomery

Kingwood Park

 

Port Neches-Groves:

Silsbee

Huntsville

Tomball

 

Hardin-Jefferson

Wk 1: Coldspring-Oakhurst

Wk 2: East Chambers

Wk 3: Woodville

Wk 4: Huffman Hargrave

Wk 5: Little Cypress-Maurieville

 

Lumberton:

Wk 1: Jasper

Wk 2: Kirbyville

Wk 3: Houston Furr

Wk 4: Tomball Concordia Lutheran

Wk 5: Silsbee 

 

Buna:

Wk 1: Cleveland

Wk 2: Hemphill

Wk 3: Coldspring

 

Newton:

Wk 1:

Wk 2: Silsbee

Wk 3:

Wk 4:

Wk 5:

 

Hardin:

Wk 1: Beaumont Legacy Christian

Wk 2: New Waverly

Wk 3: Houston KIPP

Sounds like a pretty good non-district schedule for Nederland.   I like it, it should have them ready for district.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/1/2018 at 11:29 AM, WOSgrad said:

Woodville:

Wk1 - Little Cypress-Mauriceville

Wk2 - Madisonville

Wk3 - Hardin-Jefferson

Woodville had agreed to a Week 4 game with Newton, but had to drop that game due to 12-3A-I having 8 teams in the district which meant that Woodville had only 3 non-district games available.

I hate that we had to cancel. We needed a game like that against a powerhouse before district and the playoffs. Nonetheless, I'm still pleased with our non-district schedule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, eagleswoodville#1 said:

I hate that we had to cancel. We needed a game like that against a powerhouse before district and the playoffs. Nonetheless, I'm still pleased with our non-district schedule.

Coach Robinson took the game thinking that he would be in a 6 team district.  The UIL wrecked that one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, WOSgrad said:

Coach Robinson took the game thinking that he would be in a 6 team district.  The UIL wrecked that one.

It impressed me that he scheduled the game, considering most teams seem to be casually avoiding a matchup with Newton this year. It shows me that his eyes are set much higher than a district championship. How was HJ last year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level.  We'll be at McnNeese this Friday night at 6pm.
    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an easy and obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
    • @CIS_org National Security Senior Fellow @BensmanTodd tells Steve Bannon how the U.S. State Department and USAID have been sending American taxpayer funds to religious nonprofits to facilitate mass immigration to our southern border. Bensman says 248 nonprofits are participating in the United Nations’ 2024 agenda to distribute $1.6 billion in cash, transportation, food, and shelter to U.S.-bound immigrants across Mexico and Latin America.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...