jv_coach Posted February 5, 2018 Report Share Posted February 5, 2018 UPDATE: Please note that when Andrew McCabe confirmed, earlier today, that without the Steele dossier there would have been no FISA request, he was confirming the only part of the memo that really mattered. Using that discredited dossier as the basis for the FISA request was illegal. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up baddog 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jv_coach Posted February 5, 2018 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2018 The DNC was broke in 2016, and on the verge of bankruptcy. The Hillary Clinton campaign kept it funded with the catch that the DNC understood that she owned it, and working with the DNC, Hillary Clinton beat a Bernie Sanders that would likely have won in a free and open primary. CNN and the rest of the mainstream media were in on it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jv_coach Posted February 5, 2018 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2018 What is not as well known (but was brought to light by WikiLeaks) is that Fox News was taking marching orders from Hillary Clinton’s campaign too, and Hillary Clinton wanted to run against either Ted Cruz, or, better yet, Donald Trump. Rand Paul in particular scared the hell out of her, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jv_coach Posted February 5, 2018 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2018 The real story, however, is that the Obama Administration worked with the Hillary Clinton campaign, and the DNC, with help from the media, to rig the general election. Hillary Clinton’s campaign, along with the DNC (which was funded by the Clinton Campaign), funded the Steele dossier. To add insult to injury, Christopher Steele was also a paid informant of the FBI. The Steele dossier was not credible enough for Hillary Clinton’s campaign to use directly, but it was leaked to the press (the leaks then being used to supposedly corroborate the dossier in one of the worst cases of circular reasoning I’ve ever seen), and a copy was given to the FBI, where it was used as the primary basis to get a FISA court, granting the Obama Administration the power to spy on the Trump campaign, all on behalf of one Hillary Rodham Clinton. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jv_coach Posted February 5, 2018 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2018 The level of bias in the Obama White House was astounding. We have text messages from the very people who investigated Hillary Clinton, and later started the Trump investigation, actively calling for the election to be throttled, and even going so far as to call for ‘backup plans’ and ‘insurance policies’. Christopher Steele, whose worthless dossier was the backbone of the anti-Trump conspiracy, himself actively called on taking action to defeat Trump. The media, which had been helping Trump during the Republican primary, went into full attack mode against Trump (where it remains to this day), while Barrack Obama’s administration began to use the full power of the FBI, the DOJ, and the intelligence services to try and throttle the election. Trump won anyway, but the Steele dossier was then used as the basis for a special investigator to open an investigation into Russian collusion within the Trump campaign. The fact that the Steele dossier was complete garbage did not matter in the Obama White House; Trump had very different ideas on where the country should be headed, and the Obama Administration did everything it could to discredit his Presidency, with the media playing along like hapless little puppies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jv_coach Posted February 5, 2018 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2018 Loretta Lynch meeting with former President Bill Clinton, in secret, just a few days before Loretta Lynch was supposed to decide whether or not to indict his wife (who was running for the Presidency) only adds icing to the cake, as does the knowledge that James Comey, who supposedly made the decision not to indict Hillary Clinton (I say ‘supposedly’ because the head of the FBI lacks that authority), was working on his speech exonerating Hillary Clinton, while the investigation was still ongoing, and before Loretta Lynch was caught meeting with Bill Clinton to supposedly discuss golf and grand children. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jv_coach Posted February 5, 2018 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2018 What is it again that Mueller is investigating Trump for?!? Oh yeah – exactly what we can prove Hillary Clinton and Barrack Obama did… Think about the audacity it takes to do something, fail, and then to discredit the person who won on the grounds of the winner doing what you yourself did. Obama and Clinton think we are dumb enough to go along, and thus far many of us have been, but at some point common sense has to prevail, and the truth has to come out. 77 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westend1 Posted February 6, 2018 Report Share Posted February 6, 2018 5 hours ago, jv_coach said: UPDATE: Please note that when Andrew McCabe confirmed, earlier today, that without the Steele dossier there would have been no FISA request, he was confirming the only part of the memo that really mattered. Using that discredited dossier as the basis for the FISA request was illegal. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Where does McCabe say that there would be no investigation without the doosier? I can't find anything from McCabe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jv_coach Posted February 6, 2018 Author Report Share Posted February 6, 2018 14 hours ago, westend1 said: Where does McCabe say that there would be no investigation without the doosier? I can't find anything from McCabe it seems that some people back tracked their statements, so what about all the other damning statements? “When one considers that Christopher Steele was a British spy, and that Clinton/DNC money was used to pay Russian officials to give stories about Trump, with no consideration for whether or not those stories were true (the more salacious the better), we have a case of Hillary Clinton and Barrack Obama colluding with at least two foreign powers (England and Russia) to throw an election, along with the White House using all of the power it had at its disposal to do the same.” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Englebert Posted February 6, 2018 Report Share Posted February 6, 2018 15 hours ago, westend1 said: Where does McCabe say that there would be no investigation without the doosier? I can't find anything from McCabe The Republican memo states that McCabe said, in a still classified interview, that the FISA warrant could not have been obtained without the Trump dossier. The Democrat memo is refuting that claim. I have no idea, but should be easily verifiable with the declassification of the interview. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up jv_coach 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hagar Posted February 6, 2018 Report Share Posted February 6, 2018 I stand by my thought that the charge on several people should include Treason. The overall scheme conspired with Russia to "fix an election" and place who they want as president. All the while, depriving the American voter of a free, honest election. Not sure if it meets the full legal requirements, but it fits the intention of the law. As I posted before, give'em a blindfold and a last cigarette. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baddog Posted February 6, 2018 Report Share Posted February 6, 2018 1 hour ago, REBgp said: I stand by my thought that the charge on several people should include Treason. The overall scheme conspired with Russia to "fix an election" and place who they want as president. All the while, depriving the American voter of a free, honest election. Not sure if it meets the full legal requirements, but it fits the intention of the law. As I posted before, give'em a blindfold and a last cigarette. Waste of a good bullet. How about the Iron Maiden. Hagar 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted February 7, 2018 Report Share Posted February 7, 2018 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.