Jump to content

Will America really become great again, or is this just the last hurrah?


jv_coach

Recommended Posts

Will America really become great again ,or is this just the last hurrah because it will soon come crashing down?
Today children in America are no longer brought up by parents in the way they should go. Half the children in America are now brought up without a father figure to instruct them or to be an example to emulate. When these misguided children then do not fit the norms set by the “schools”, they are put on mind altering drugs.
Individualism and critical thinking has been replaced with collectivism and group think.
homosexuality and divorce have replaced the traditional family.
Truth is relative and not seen as absolute.
Churches promote the social gospel over the true gospel.
The national debt doubled from $10 trillion to $20 trillion under the Obama administration so believing that it will double again over the next ten years is probably what will happen. President Trump cut taxes and plans to expand spending will at the least make inflation rise, and as Milton Friedman warned "cutting taxes and increased spending leads to inflation" and that we can not run from.
Inflation or a depression will end any irrational exuberance within a few years. When the economy crashes who do you think will be blamed? Then who will be elected in 2021 or 2025? Seeing that Marxists already control the Democratic Party and seeing trends toward socialism in our nation. I would bet on a hard-core Marxist being elected President.
Electing another Marxist to run America (Obama was a Marxist) and if that happens history has shown that a country either go into a civil war or "re-education" happens on a mass scale.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish I could find fault with your post Coach, but other than a smidgen of doubt (hope?) at one or two things, I can't.  I'll say this for the democrats, when they made a big left turn many years ago, they stayed the course, allowing Republican Presidents to be elected, knowing that they'd get their chance.  Now, with Feinstein and Pelosi being labeled moderate by most in the Party (I guess moderate now is just an ultra liberal, which is what they are), by any definition what you have left is Marxist.  And your last two paragraphs are prophetic.

All of us can see what Obama has done to the judiciary.  Imo, about the only thing holding our country together is the SCOTUS, and only by a hair.  Imagine what would happen if we had seven Ginsburgs on it.  Give the Marxist enough time, that's what will happen, then it's pretty much all over.  Funny, old Khrushchev was right,  Again, jmo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, REBgp said:

I wish I could find fault with your post Coach, but other than a smidgen of doubt (hope?) at one or two things, I can't.  I'll say this for the democrats, when they made a big left turn many years ago, they stayed the course, allowing Republican Presidents to be elected, knowing that they'd get their chance.  Now, with Feinstein and Pelosi being labeled moderate by most in the Party (I guess moderate now is just an ultra liberal, which is what they are), by any definition what you have left is Marxist.  And your last two paragraphs are prophetic.

All of us can see what Obama has done to the judiciary.  Imo, about the only thing holding our country together is the SCOTUS, and only by a hair.  Imagine what would happen if we had seven Ginsburgs on it.  Give the Marxist enough time, that's what will happen, then it's pretty much all over.  Funny, old Khrushchev was right,  Again, jmo

Marxist are always redefining word's in order to advance their beliefs. If they told the truth people would see their evil, but if they hide their agenda and redefine "moderate" to be an ultra-liberal, then over time (like you said) what is perverted becomes accepted. Look at the redefining of marriage. We are not even fighting homo-sexuaity anymore, we have boys claiming to be girls and beating the dog mess out of girls in wrestling. In 1970's if you would have said that Title IX would be used by the government to mandate that boys and girls share the locker room, it would have never passed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, jv_coach said:

Marxist are always redefining word's in order to advance their beliefs. If they told the truth people would see their evil, but if they hide their agenda and redefine "moderate" to be an ultra-liberal, then over time (like you said) what is perverted becomes accepted. Look at the redefining of marriage. We are not even fighting homo-sexuaity anymore, we have boys claiming to be girls and beating the dog mess out of girls in wrestling. In 1970's if you would have said that Title IX would be used by the government to mandate that boys and girls share the locker room, it would have never passed.

What happened to (to quote a Star Trek movie), "the needs of the many outweighs the needs of the few"?  And what I can't figure out, what has taken common sense out of the human equation?  Was it our educational system?  Was it the TV shows they watched as kids?  Or just to much TV?  As bad as Trump may be in his personal life, how could anyone support, or even defend Hillary is beyond my understanding.  I've never heard a democrat admit anything bad about her, except Hoops.  And, imo, the gun control, homosexuals, gays & TG are merely means to an end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, REBgp said:

What happened to (to quote a Star Trek movie), "the needs of the many outweighs the needs of the few"?  And what I can't figure out, what has taken common sense out of the human equation?  Was it our educational system?  Was it the TV shows they watched as kids?  Or just to much TV?  As bad as Trump may be in his personal life, how could anyone support, or even defend Hillary is beyond my understanding.  I've never heard a democrat admit anything bad about her, except Hoops.  And, imo, the gun control, homosexuals, gays & TG are merely means to an end.

It is the advance of humanistic secular reasoning in which morals are based on what man says ( moral relativism) rather  then what God has revealed through scripture and nature (moral absolutes).

This is the hidden content, please

this podcast talks about it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,177
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Sharpie98
    Newest Member
    Sharpie98
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...