Jump to content

ARTHUR LOUIS NAMED NEW HEAD COACH AT BEAUMONT UNITED!


DannyShapiroBE

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, 5GallonBucket said:

Not to change sports, when are they picking the bball coach and are they gonna go about it the same way

I would think so...Our only saving grace for that is, both schools at least have decent candidates, and if they choose to go old school like Louis it would be Boutte

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Alpha Wolf said:

At least you have some time to see how things unfold and if they smooth out.  I don't have that luxury.

More power to you brother, idk how you aint called up there yet to give them a piece of your mind on how this process was handled lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TexazBall said:

More power to you brother, idk how you aint called up there yet to give them a piece of your mind on how this process was handled lol

Oh, they know me real well.  Between visits, phone calls and e-mails, they know me.  And for at least the next 4 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ARTHUR LOUIS
4 years; 24-20-0; 4-1-0
1998  Beaumont Ozen           3-8-0 T
1999  Beaumont Ozen           6-5-0 R
2000  Beaumont Ozen           9-3-0*
2001  Beaumont Ozen           6-4-0 T

* All of those years were in the old 19-4a, (Lumberton, Jasper, Silsbee, Dayton and Livingston ) were in that district.  Lost to Nederland in Bi-district in 1998, 1999 and 2001.   Also lost to Nederland and PNG in non-district in 1998 and 1999.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Matthew328 said:

Just some info on Coach Stowers he's not in coaching right now....but he's got a son who will be QB at Denton Guyer and he's a stud....already has a Baylor offer.....will be a sophomore next year.....talked to several at Guyer and they say Eli Stowers has a chance to be real special

 

This is the hidden content, please

If you were around when Stowers was at Central, this may be a shocker lol, he was always crying but I guess Stowers toughened him up real quick . Wish him nothing but success

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have to think, how much did all of the parents beating the table about tradition and history have to do with the hire of Louis? If the BISD parents would have been a bit more optimistic about the opening of a new school and all the opportunities it would bring, then maybe BISD would've been more open to going outside of the usual norms and hiring an outsider. I am sure they wanted to make those "tradition and history" parents believe they were invested in keeping the "tradition and history". Due to that, you guys got Arthur Louis rather than Todd Peterman.......simple as that IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 2wedge said:

You have to think, how much did all of the parents beating the table about tradition and history have to do with the hire of Louis? If the BISD parents would have been a bit more optimistic about the opening of a new school and all the opportunities it would bring, then maybe BISD would've been more open to going outside of the usual norms and hiring an outsider. I am sure they wanted to make those "tradition and history" parents believe they were invested in keeping the "tradition and history". Due to that, you guys got Arthur Louis rather than Todd Peterman.......simple as that IMO.

Tbh, me as a future United parent and ones ive been around and talked to all wanted an outside hire, i really think this was all the Boards doing...I feel they wanted the buddy-buddy thing, not us as football parents, cus we knew better and knew if we wanted our kids to be the most successful and play at the highest level and be competitive we needed someone outside of the usual norm..

I was personally a fan of Botkin as well as Lydell but Peterman would have been just as good if not better then both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined



  • Posts

    • naw, maaaaybe 7, definitely not 8 deep.  today im avoiding sitting by #10s parents, had to move away yesterday.   "put my son back in jub, put my son back in"  and then crying on every little touch of someone.    lets ball out today ktz!    
    • Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level.  We'll be at McNeese this Friday night at 6pm.
    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...